展品99.3

在能源轉型中茁壯成長氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告

氣候和2023年過渡進展行動報告 承認國家伍德賽德的計劃承認土著和託雷斯海峽島民為澳大利亞？S原住民。我們承認它們與土地、水和環境的聯繫，並向祖先和長輩致敬，無論是過去的還是現在的。我們對世界各地的原住民人民和社區給予這種承認和尊重。關於本報告本《氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告》概述了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期間的伍德賽德？S氣候相關計劃、活動、進展和氣候相關數據。它旨在提供符合氣候相關財務披露特別工作組(TCFD)建議的披露之間的平衡，同時避免向讀者提供大量信息。伍德賽德認為，本報告包含符合TCFD的披露？S提出了4項建議和11項建議披露，並注意到其對所有部門的指導和對非金融集團的指導。1，2伍德賽德指出，在完成其2023年狀況報告後，TCFD已完成其職權範圍並解散。國際清算銀行金融安全委員會已要求國際財務報告準則(IFRS)基金會接管對公司進展的監督？與氣候有關的披露。本報告的編制也參考了可持續會計準則委員會(SASB)石油和天然氣勘探與生產標準中選定的相關指標。3索引將本報告中的內容與這些建議交叉引用。鑑於本氣候過渡行動計劃的重點，它必須面向未來事件， 包含有關伍德賽德與氣候變化相關的計劃、戰略、目標、指標、抱負等的前瞻性信息。無論是我們幫助我們實現戰略目標的計劃，還是本報告更一般的內容，都不是對未來事件將會或可能發生的聲明、保證或預測。關於本報告範圍的進一步詳情，包括免責聲明、風險、排放數據和其他重要信息，載於第81-82頁。除非另有説明，所有美元均以美國貨幣伍德賽德股票表示。除非另有説明，排放是指温室氣體排放。伍德賽德能源集團有限公司(ABN 55 004 898 962)是伍德賽德集團公司的最終控股公司。在本報告中，除非另有説明，否則指的是伍德賽德、我們的、我們的。或者？我們？請參考伍德賽德能源集團有限公司及其控制的實體。2023年年報我們的2023年年報提供了截至2023年12月31日的12個月期間伍德賽德？S的運營和活動以及伍德賽德？S截至2023年12月31日的財務狀況的摘要。它還提供了截至2023年12月31日的12個月期間伍德賽德？S的可持續發展方法、健康和安全績效以及其他 信息的摘要。2023年年度報告和本氣候轉型行動計劃以及2023年進展報告共同為伍德賽德？S的業務提供了補充回顧。這些報告可在我們的 網站伍德賽德網站上找到。報告反饋我們歡迎對本《氣候過渡行動計劃》和《2023年進度報告》的反饋，請發送至pananyinfo@wood side.com。GHD Pty Ltd已對選定的温室氣體排放數據進行了有限保證。有關保證範圍的更多信息，請參閲第83頁。封面以日本東京的天際線為特色。1金融穩定委員會，2017年。？與氣候有關的財務披露問題工作隊的建議。最終報告。？圖4，第14頁。TCFD的一些要素？S的四項建議和11項建議公開以不同的順序列出，以增強可讀性。第80頁提供了TCFD和本報告之間的交叉引用。2金融穩定委員會，2021年。？執行氣候相關財務披露工作隊的建議。3 SASB，2018。？石油和天然氣？勘探和生產。可持續性 會計準則。版本2018-10。？表1，第6頁，伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司2

內容1.摘要4 1.1傾聽和迴應4 1.2如何閲讀本報告8 2.治理10 2.1董事會監督11 3.脱碳戰略13 3.1氣候戰略14 3.2 2023淨股本範圍1和2排放績效16 3.3淨股本範圍1和2：淨零行動計劃18 3.4碳 信用額度28 3.5範圍3排放32 3.6範圍3目標34 3.7支持我們的價值鏈41 4.資本分配42 4.1資本調整43 4.2全球石油和天然氣需求天然氣44 4.3天然氣的角色演變46 4.4通過多元化管理不確定性 48 4.5評估轉型彈性的投資決策50 4.6伍德賽德？S投資組合的情景分析52 4.7客户關係54 5.風險管理56 5.1風險管理框架57 5.2與氣候有關的關鍵風險和機會59 5.3管理實物風險62 6.參與度64 6.1政策參與度65 6.2行業倡議67 6.3 A剛剛過渡68 6.4內部氣候參與度70 7.附錄71 7.1與氣候有關的數據72 7.2關於2023年範圍1和範圍2排放報廢的碳信用來源74 7.3範圍3方法75 7.4詞彙表77 7.5索引80 7.6免責聲明，風險、排放數據和其他重要信息81 7.7 GHD保證聲明83伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司III

傾聽和迴應伍德賽德？S對氣候變化的迴應 融入了我們公司的戰略，以在能源轉型中蓬勃發展。在2023年期間，我仔細聽取了我們的投資者的意見，他們告訴我，他們想要關於我們的氣候行動計劃的更詳細的信息。因此，這份氣候轉型行動計劃是我們之前披露的內容的演變。更新還記錄了我們減少淨資產範圍1和2排放的計劃的進展和結果，並投資於能源過渡的產品和服務。對我們產品的需求 投資者的一個關鍵要求是解釋更多關於過渡期間對我們產品的未來需求，以及為什麼我們相信伍德賽德？S項目將具有競爭力。這是成功且有利可圖地將全球能源需求轉化為我們產品實現銷售的關鍵。因此，我們在本報告中包含了更多信息，包括：分析全球能源市場可能如何發展，包括可能將升温限制在1.5攝氏度以下的情況；天然氣在能源轉型中的潛在作用；我們如何評估我們的投資對能源轉型關鍵方面的彈性；我們如何與客户合作加強我們的貿易關係；以及 瞭解我們關鍵市場的政策。將斯卡伯勒合資公司10%的股份出售給LNG日本公司，並將15.1%的股份出售給JERA，這是雙方需求一致的一個例子。1這些戰略關係還包括潛在的LNG承購和在新能源機會上的合作。範圍1和範圍2排放我們還提供了我們在範圍1和範圍2減排方面的最新進展，以及我們未來的計劃。2023年，我們實現了淨權益範圍1和範圍2排放量在起始基數下減少12.5%。與2022.2年度的11%相比，由於我們設施的潛在排放表現，我們使用的碳信用作為補償比去年減少了13%。我們在我們合併的運營資產組合中完成了脱碳計劃 ，確定了多個技術選項，以減少我們當前投資組合的範圍1和範圍2的總排放量。這些計劃中的技術也可用於設計我們增長機會的排放 。我們繼續發展我們的碳信用投資組合。我們還包括了有關其規模和組成的更多信息，以及我們用來評估其完整性的盡職調查程序。與本頁相關的所有腳註均顯示在下一頁上。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司4

範圍3排放我們的範圍3方法包括 在我們的產品組合中引入新產品和服務，如氫和碳捕獲利用和儲存(CCUS)。這些產品和服務可以幫助我們的客户避免或減少其範圍1或2的排放，從而降低我們產品組合的生命週期(範圍1、2和3)的排放強度。2023年，我們繼續審查我們對範圍3目標的方法，以迴應投資者的反饋，並決定用新的補充性減排目標來補充我們現有的投資目標。這一目標是到2030年在新能源產品和低碳服務方面做出國家投資決策，總減排能力達到5 Mtpa CO-E.3 2投資目標跟蹤我們開發這些項目並將其推向市場的工作。減排目標將跟蹤它們對客户排放的影響。2023年在碳捕獲和儲存(CCS)和氫氣機會方面的支出超過2.35億美元，與2022年相比增長了135% ，朝着我們到2030.3年前在新能源產品和低碳服務上投資50億美元的目標不斷邁進。4我們在本報告中是否包含了關於我們的CCS和氫氣項目進展的更多信息，以及實現我們的目標的風險？例如確保有利可圖的客户流失？以及我們正在做些什麼來應對這些風險。治理由我們的主席Richard Goyder領導的董事會監督我們的氣候工作，以便我們對氣候變化的治理反映它對我們公司的戰略重要性。作為我們對董事會技能和組成的持續審查的一部分，我們在2023年進行了改革，以加強我們的董事會和委員會，目的是使它們處於最佳地位，以支持我們的全球業務， 以及我們在能源轉型期間的戰略增長機會。董事會還決定修訂我們的高管薪酬框架，以使範圍1和2排放總量以及新能源項目進展的目標 將影響高管領導團隊績效薪酬的結果。除了披露我們的政策宣傳活動外，我們還審查了我們的行業協會成員資格，包括評估行業協會活動是否支持《巴黎協定》的目標。我們已經在我們的網站上公佈了審查結果。本氣候轉型行動計劃將於2024年4月在我們的年度股東大會(AGM)上進行顧問股東投票。我相信它值得我們股東的堅定支持？這是對我們的計劃、我們的進展和我們的挑戰的徹底審查。但這並不是最後的決定。我們的戰略和業績已經並將在未來幾年繼續發展。我們將繼續積極尋求股東的反饋意見。未來幾年將發佈進度報告，並對三年後計劃的更新計劃進行進一步投票？時間，或在特殊情況需要時更早 。梅格·奧尼爾擔任董事首席執行官兼董事總經理2024年2月1請訪問Woodside網站，查看題為？伍德賽德將向日本液化天然氣公司出售10%斯卡伯勒權益？(2023年8月8日)和？伍德賽德將向傑拉出售15.1%斯卡伯勒權益？(2024年2月23日)的公告。温室氣體排放數據，包括本氣候過渡行動計劃中對未來減排計劃的圖表和估計，沒有更新以反映由於向JERA出售15.1%的權益而導致的伍德賽德？S在斯卡伯勒合資企業的股權份額的變化。2目標和期望是淨權益範圍1和2的温室氣體排放量，相對於6.32公噸CO-e的起始基數，代表2016-2020年權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放的年均總量，可根據生產或受制裁資產的潛在權益變化進行調整(上調或下調)，但在2021年前作出最終投資決定。淨權益排放量包括利用碳信用作為補償。3範圍3的目標取決於商業安排、商業可行性、監管和合資企業的批准以及第三方活動(可能進行也可能不進行)。個人投資 以伍德賽德？S的投資目標為準。而不是指導。可能既包括有機投資，也包括無機投資。4包括RFSU之前在新能源產品和低碳服務上的支出，這些服務可以通過使用這些產品和服務來幫助我們的客户實現脱碳。這筆資金不用於為減少伍德賽德？S淨股本範圍1和2的排放提供資金，這兩個範圍通過資產脱碳計劃單獨管理。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展 報告沃德賽德能源集團能源集團有限公司5

重點介紹減少淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放2023業績範圍1和2權益範圍1和2總權益温室氣體排放量(Mt CO？-e)温室氣體排放強度3 8 35 6估計的避免生產排放量1 30抵消排放量Boe 4/Woodside淨值-CO2 25必和必拓2資產排放津貼kg(合併前)合併實體0起點基數2 20 2022 2023全球平均伍德賽德森林2023估計2022 2023 2050淨零預期潛在途徑淨零(權益範圍1和2年平均Mtpa CO-e)4 2在投資組合中生產資產和批准項目8 6 4正在進行中的機會2抵消4 2016-2020年開始淨排放量2 2023 2024-2030 2031-2040 2041-2050淨排放量比開始基數低12.5%，從20222年度的11%上升？由於我們設施的潛在排放表現，用作補償的碳信用比去年減少了13%。？正在實現淨資產範圍1和2的減排目標：到2025年減少15%，到2030年減少30%。？總排放強度低於(好於)可比能源組合的基準？並在2023.3作了進一步改進，1避免排放的量化本質上是不確定的。然而，可以通過與液化天然氣、常規大陸架和深水資產組合的基準進行比較來提供估計，這些資產組合的產量為187.2 Mboe(2023年伍德賽德權益產量)，產品組合與伍德賽德類似。有許多潛在基準可提供對2023年全球石油和天然氣作業平均排放強度的估計。基於Wood Mackenzie？S排放基準工具，估計避免排放量約為391kt CO-e，而根據國際能源署S？石油和天然氣行業淨零過渡2(2023年11月)表3.1中報告的行業平均排放量，估計避免排放量約為1,705kt CO-e。此圖表中顯示的估計避免排放量 表示2兩個估計值之間的範圍。伍德賽德沒有獨立核實這些估計背後的數據。2目標和期望是淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放量相對於6.32公噸CO-e的起始基數 ，這2代表2016-2020年權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放的年平均總量，可能會進行調整(在合併的運營資產組合中完成資產脱碳計劃4？多個避免或減少排放的選項正在進行中：斯卡伯勒的設計中納入了節省的約16公噸CO-e(累積到2050年)，2個冥王星列車2和Trion項目約12公噸CO-e(累積到2050年)，在現有資產的進一步削減 舉措中，目標是在2030~35公噸CO-e(累積到2050年)之前實施2更多機會(大規模但追溯成本昂貴)2計劃成熟技術和降低成本作為未來的選擇選項。？ 碳信用組合：管理下的20公噸CO-E，以2

INVESTING IN PRODUCTS AND SERVICES FOR THE ENERGY TRANSITION RESILIENCE OF NATURAL GAS Potential global use of gas in pathways that limit warming1 range 300 use gas range 250 use Globalgas 200 (C1): Global C3): Historical Gas Production (IEA) EJ/Year 150 C2, scenarios (C1, Natural 100 in exis gas supply ting and with appr inves range oved projectmen ts t overshoot) (IEA) 2C 50 Natural gas supply (noto no further with investmen t (IEA) 5C 5C 1 . 1 . 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 SCOPE 3 TARGETS INVESTMENT EMISSIONS 2023 PROGRESS TARGET2 ABATEMENT TARGET2 UPDATE Investment in new Take FID on new energy Cumulative total spend energy products and products and lower carbon on new energy products lower carbon services services by 2030, with total and lower carbon by 2030. abatement capacity of services.3 $ $ 5billion3 5Mtpa CO?-e4 335million Natural gas expected to have a sustained role in energy transition ? Anticipated uses include: Supporting renewables in power grids, In hard to abate sectors such as for high process temperature heat, As a chemical feedstock. ? Chart shows range of global gas use in 1.5C and also 1.5C-2C pathways from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report, compared to gas supply estimates from the International Energy Agency in the absence of investment in new ?elds. ? Converting global demand into realised sales for Woodside requires: careful analysis of climate- and energy-related scenarios, disciplined capital allocation, assessment of project resilience to the energy transition, and strong customer relationships. New Scope 3 Emissions Abatement Target established to complement the existing Scope 3 Investment Target ? New energy products (e.g. hydrogen) and lower carbon services (e.g. CCS) can help our customers avoid or reduce their Scope 1 or 2 emissions ? and therefore reduce the life cycle (Scope 1, 2 and 3) emissions intensity of our portfolio. ? The investment target tracks our work to develop these projects and bring them to market. The emissions abatement target will track their impact on customer emissions. 1 IPCC and IEA data sources along with other important notes included on page 45. 2 Scope 3 targets are subject to commercial arrangements, commercial feasibility, regulatory and Joint Venture approvals, and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). Individual investment decisions are subject to Woodside?s investment targets. Not guidance. Potentially includes both organic and inorganic investment. 3 Includes pre-RFSU spend on new energy products and lower carbon services that can help our customers decarbonise by using these products and services. It is not used to fund reductions of Woodside?s net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions which are managed separately through asset decarbonisation plans. 4 Includes binding and non-binding opportunities in the portfolio, subject to commercial arrangements, commercial feasibility, regulatory and Joint Venture approvals, and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). Individual investment decisions are subject to Woodside?s investment targets. Not guidance. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 7

How to read this report GOVERNANCE This section explains how Woodside manages and oversees its response to the challenge of climate change. It includes information about: Board oversight Board skills and composition Executive remuneration Management structure. DECARBONISATION STRATEGY This section explains how Woodside manages emissions associated with its current portfolio. It includes information about: Net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions performance Net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction plans Focus topics: Asset decarbonisation in practice Methane emissions management Large scale abatement: vision for Pluto net zero Decarbonisation technology development Our utilisation of carbon credits Our approach to Scope 3 emissions Our progress in developing new energy products and lower carbon services. CAPITAL ALLOCATION This section explains how Woodside integrates consideration of climate change into its investment decisions about new projects. It includes information about: Our capital alignment approach How global energy markets might evolve, including in scenarios that could limit warming to 1.5C How we assess our investments for their resilience to key aspects of the energy transition Scenario analysis of Woodside?s portfolio, including with a 1.5C scenario How we collaborate with customers to strengthen our trading relationships. RISK MANAGEMENT This section explains how Woodside identi?es and manages climate-related risks and opportunities. It includes information about: Our approach to risk management Our identi?ed climate-related risks and opportunities Physical risks. ENGAGEMENT This section explains how Woodside engages with society on climate-related issues. It includes information about: Our advocacy and how we consider the Paris Agreement goals Our lobbying with governments Our memberships of industry associations Our approach to a just transition. Future of reporting This report contains disclosures consistent with TCFD?s four recommendations and eleven recommended disclosures, noting its Guidance for all Sectors and Guidance for Non-Financial Groups. A table cross-referencing the content in this document to the TCFD recommendations is provided on page 80. Woodside supports the harmonisation of climate and sustainability reporting standards intended by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), and encourages other standard-setting and benchmarking organisations to also align. The Australian Government has con?rmed that it intends to mandate climate reporting standards from 1 July 2024. Woodside and industry associations such as the Business Council of Australia are engaging with the government and the Australian Accounting Standards Board about detailed design issues. We intend to undertake analysis of any changes required in our reporting during the course of 2024, and note the high level alignment of the proposed standards with the recommendations of the TCFD. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 8

燃氣可用於住宅和商業烹飪 。對投資者反饋的迴應相對於2022年伍德賽德氣候報告的最新內容包括：頁面目標和伍德賽德？s的計劃實現目標6—7、16—17的進展 在合併後的投資組合中延長資產脱碳計劃15、18 2030年至2050年期間的減排19—21脱碳項目管道15、18—21，24—5範圍3減排目標32—34新能源和低碳服務項目 管道36—40利用碳信用額作為抵消伍德賽德？利用抵消的方法28—31碳信用額度退役的報告74未退役的碳信用額度組合的報告31對伍德賽德產品的需求的彈性範圍3排放源32—33，72—73能源轉型中的客户需求44—47，54—55資本分配的方法43，48—53治理委員會的技能和組成11管理結構12高管薪酬中與氣候有關的目標12政策參與伍德賽德倡導活動65—69審查行業協會活動65，67伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 9

政府天然氣用於 發電，為我們的家庭供電。

Board oversight The Board of Woodside is responsible for the approval and oversight of our climate change strategy. Climate change is a standing agenda item at each regular meeting of the Sustainability Committee, or the Board when the Sustainability Committee does not meet, with information presented by management, external advisers or third party specialists where appropriate. The Board oversees our climate strategy and receives regular performance updates from management. During 2023, the Board and its Committees were informed about and considered climate-related issues on multiple occasions, including when reviewing and guiding strategy, risk management, annual budgets and business plans, and overseeing major capital expenditure, as well as when setting the Group?s performance objectives and monitoring implementation and performance. The Board continuously reviews progress towards our climate-related targets and our 2050 aspiration by receiving regular updates from the Executive Leadership Team and reports from other management involved in implementing the Group?s climate strategy. The Chair undertakes an annual Governance Roadshow with key institutional investors and investor organisations, including members of Climate Action 100+, to discuss Woodside?s approach to climate change and also listen to any concerns raised by investors. In 2023 the Chair held 43 such meetings. This engagement is supported by our Investor Relations function which had 70 meetings specifically on climate change. BOARD SKILLS AND COMPOSITION The non-executive directors contribute diverse operational and international experience, an understanding of the industry in which Woodside operates, knowledge of ?nancial markets and an understanding of the health, safety, environmental, community and other sustainability matters that are important to Woodside. The Board supplements its climate change awareness by seeking the input of executives and external advisers and specialists to further inform its decisions. The competencies and skills of the directors are set out in the skills matrix described in the Annual Report 2023, in section 4.1. In 2021, the Board skills matrix was updated to include energy transition and climate-related components to reflect the increasing importance of these issues to Woodside?s operations. The Board uses this skills matrix to assess the skills and experience of each director and the combined capabilities of the Board, to identify potential areas of focus for director recruitment and to identify any professional development opportunities that may bene?t directors. In 2023 and early 2024, Woodside announced changes to the membership of its Board of Directors, as part of its continuous review of Board skills and composition. These changes were intended to enhance Woodside?s Board and Committees so that they are best placed to support Woodside?s global operations and strategic growth opportunities through the energy transition. Further information on Board skills and composition is included in the Corporate Governance Statement in section 4.1 of the Annual Report 2023. BOARD COMMITTEES The Board has four standing committees to assist in the discharge of its responsibilities, including on climate change risk. The Sustainability Committee?s responsibilities include reviewing, and making recommendations to the Board on, the Company?s policy and performance in relation to sustainability-related matters, including climate change. The Audit & Risk Committee assists the Board to meet its oversight responsibilities in relation to the company?s financial reporting, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, internal control structure, risk management and insurance procedures and the internal and external audit functions. Given the importance of climate change as a strategic risk to Woodside, and potential implications relating to financial reporting, it is one of the key risks considered by the Audit & Risk Committee during the review of the company?s risk management framework. The Committee also considers the inclusion of climate-related risks within Woodside?s internal audit program and the appropriateness of disclosures on climate-related risk within the consolidated financial statements. The Nominations & Governance Committee assists the Board with reviewing Board composition, performance and succession planning. This includes identifying, evaluating and recommending candidates for the Board, taking into account the factors set out in the Board skills matrix in section 4.1 of the Annual Report 2023, including energy transition and climate change. The Human Resources & Compensation Committee assists the Board with establishing human resources and compensation policies and practices. Performance based remuneration for the CEO, senior leadership team and all other permanent employees include metrics related to achieving our climate change strategy. Further details are provided in the 2023 Remuneration Report in section 4.3 of the Annual Report 2023. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 11

關於2023年CEO和高管薪酬，董事會 決定從2024年起，氣候指標將成為影響可變年度薪酬的高管薪酬的一個獨特組成部分。氣候指標將佔總記分卡的15%，其中70%基於總範圍1和2排放績效 ，30%基於新能源項目進度。1、2個單獨的關鍵績效指標(KPI)也可以根據其角色和職責添加到高管績效協議中。管理層首席執行官兼董事董事總經理(首席執行官)負責戰略的實施，包括氣候變化戰略，並直接向董事會報告。首席執行官由行政領導團隊提供支持。執行副總裁總裁 戰略與氣候直接向首席執行官彙報，是執行領導團隊的成員。高級領導人通過向執行領導團隊作報告和文件等渠道，以及分發董事會文件和其他有關氣候相關議題的定期更新，向執行領導團隊通報氣候相關問題的進展情況並監測進展情況。執行戰略的責任嵌入到適當的業務組中。由於氣候變化的戰略性質，許多團體有責任交付該戰略的內容，如表所示。董事會和執行關係董事會可持續發展審計和風險人力資源 &提名和治理委員會薪酬委員會首席執行官業務小組氣候相關角色和責任業務小組戰略和氣候發展戰略供董事會批准， 包括推薦目標。設計公司範圍內的流程，以協助業務交付，在需要時提供主題專業知識，例如集成的排放核算和預測、公司範圍內的脱碳優先順序。監測 並向董事會通報目標的進展情況以及其他與氣候有關的內部和外部事態發展。準備與氣候有關的披露，以供董事會批准。政府參與和政策倡導。金融設定了資本配置框架 。與債務和股權投資者聯絡，就氣候相關問題進行溝通和接受反饋。探索、開發和識別？設計？在項目設計中提供機會並實施選定的計劃。項目準備一個過渡案例(見第50-51頁)，供執行委員會和董事會在投資階段大門決策中考慮。澳大利亞和國際準備資產脱碳計劃。運營實現了技術上可行的脱碳機會 成本低於80美元/噸CO-E。實施選定的商機，成本超過80美元/噸的CO-E(受管理層監督)。新能源進展CCS、氫氣等新能源機遇。建立一個經過 誠信盡職調查的碳信用組合。技術服務通過初步評估提高技術機會，以便運營部門考慮進行選擇。1總股本排放量在碳信用報廢前計算為補償 ，將組織重點放在避免和減少排放上2新能源項目進展(包括新能源產品和低碳服務)取決於商業安排、商業可行性、監管 和合資企業批准，以及第三方活動(可能進行也可能不進行)。個人投資決策受制於伍德賽德？S的投資目標。而不是指導。可能包括有機和無機投資。伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司12

脱碳策略氣體用於各種高温工業流程，如玻璃生產。

氣候戰略伍德賽德？S氣候戰略被整合到我們的公司戰略中：我們渴望以低成本、低碳、盈利、彈性和多樣化的投資組合在能源轉型中蓬勃發展1我們的氣候戰略包含兩個關鍵要素：減少我們的淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放；以及投資於能源轉型的產品和服務。減少我們的淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放得到三個槓桿的支持：在設計中避免排放，在運營中減少 排放，以及通過碳信用來抵消其餘部分。對產品和服務的投資也得到了三個槓桿的支持：評估投資對能源轉型的適應能力；使我們的產品和服務多樣化；以及支持我們的客户和供應商減少排放。這些槓桿得到了我們促進全球衡量和報告的工作的支持？包括我們自己發佈的透明披露。我們的氣候轉型行動計劃(CTAP)(本報告)中的詳細內容支持了我們 戰略的每一個要素。該計劃的細節預計將隨着時間的推移而繼續演變，並將在未來的披露中更新。在能源轉型中茁壯成長 有利可圖的N B O R ES A I L R C I E E NT W L O D T優化I S V O價值和E C R S W股東F O回報E I L D伍德賽德？S氣候戰略整合在我們整個公司的戰略脱碳計劃1對於伍德賽德，較低的碳 投資組合是指淨股權範圍1和2的温室氣體排放，包括使用抵消，正在朝着目標減少，並計劃引入新的能源產品和低碳服務，作為對現有和新的石油和天然氣投資的補充。我們的氣候政策制定了我們相信將幫助我們實現這一目標的原則。2第15頁的圖表代表了我們在2024年2月27日發表時具有代表性的氣候計劃、進展和 機會中精選的關鍵例子。本文旨在對伍德賽德？S的計劃和機會進行總結，但不是完整的表述，僅供參考，而不是指導。計劃是動態的， 應預期會發生變化，包括但不限於確定其他機會、現有機會的進展或完成、和/或延遲或刪除不能保證繼續進行的當前機會。 計劃和機會受以下因素的影響：技術評估、商業評估、客户承購、政策和監管框架的發展或更改，以及監管機構和合資夥伴的批准。本文檔提供了更多 信息。3參見Woodside將15.1%的Scarborough權益出售給jera？(2024年2月23日)的公告。温室氣體排放數據，包括本氣候過渡行動計劃中對未來減排計劃的圖表和估計，尚未更新，以反映由於向JERA出售15.1%權益而導致伍德賽德？S在斯卡伯勒合資企業中的股權份額的變化。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司14

請參閲上一頁中與此圖表相關的腳註2和3。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司15

2023 emissions net equity performance Scope 1 and 2 Woodside is targeting a reduction of net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions of 15% by 2025 and 30% by 2030, with an aspiration of net zero by 2050 or sooner. The net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets are relative to a starting base of 6.32 million tonnes of CO -e, which is representative of the gross annual average equity 2 Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions over 2016-2020. This starting base may be adjusted (up or down) for potential equity changes in producing or sanctioned assets with a ?nal investment decision prior to 2021. The targets mean that net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the 12-month period ending 31 December 2025 are targeted to be 15% lower than the starting base, and that net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the 12-month period ending 31 December 2030 are targeted to be 30% lower than the starting base. OUR PROGRESS TO DATE Woodside has a long standing focus on energy efficiency. Our ?rst formal climate-related target was a 5% energy efficiency target over the period 2016-20. We exceeded it, achieving 8%. Quantification of avoided emissions is inherently uncertain. However, it is possible to provide an estimate by comparison to benchmarks of a comparable portfolio of LNG, conventional shelf and deepwater assets producing 187.2 MMboe (Woodside equity production 2023) with a similar product mix to Woodside. There are a number of potential benchmarks providing estimates of the 2023 global average emissions intensity of oil and gas operations. Two examples are Wood Mackenzie?s Emissions Benchmarking Tool, and the industry average emissions reported in Table 3.1 of IEA?s ?The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions? (November 2023). Comparing Woodside?s Scope 1 and 2 emissions to their average intensity data indicates avoided emissions of 391 kt CO -e and 1,705 kt CO -e respectively. Woodside does not 2 2 independently verify the data behind these estimates.1 Contributions to this were made by the intrinsic characteristics of our oil and gas resources, the design of our facilities, the 2016-2020 energy efficiency target, and the implementation of asset decarbonisation plans from 2021 onwards. OUR 2023 PERFORMANCE 2023 was a strong emissions performance year for our facilities. Despite higher production due to a full year of our merger with BHP?s petroleum business, we advanced our net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction to 12.5% (compared to 11% in 2022), relative to an adjusted post merger base.2 We also utilised 13% fewer carbon credits than last year, offsetting 96 kt CO -e fewer emissions because of the emissions avoidance 2 and reduction we have achieved. A further indication of the underlying emissions performance at our facilities is that our Scope 1 and 2 gross emissions intensity (a measure of emissions, per unit of production) improved by 3% year on year, and is better than a comparable benchmark.3 We do not expect improvement of gross emissions like this every year: for example, from 2024 the start-up of the Sangomar facility in Senegal (including one-off commissioning emissions) is expected to increase gross emissions for a period. This is why our utilisation of carbon credits as offsets is an important stabiliser, so we are able to reduce our net emissions consistently, notwithstanding operational ?uctuations and while our asset decarbonisation plans build momentum. For more information on the use of carbon credits please see section 3.4. All footnotes related to this page are displayed on the next page. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 16

淨股本範圍1和2減排目標在2025年實現12.5%減排目標：2025年達到15%到2030年達到淨零30%2050年或更早淨股本範圍1和2排放量(Mt CO-e)8 6估計避免排放量1 4抵消排放量伍德賽德淨股本排放量 必和必拓2資產排放(合併前)合併實體0起點基數2 20232 2022年範圍1和2總排放強度3 35產量30 boe/e二氧化碳排放25公斤20全球平均伍德賽德2023年甲烷排放量估計值0.2石油2023年甲烷排放強度4和氣體氣候倡議(%)(OGCI)目標遠低於0.2%氣體0.15上市0.1 SM3/SM3 0.05 0 OGCI行業伍德賽德2023年2022 2023伍德賽德？S淨權益範圍1和2 2023年温室氣體排放量總計5,532 kt CO？-e，比起始基數低12.5%。2總權益範圍1和2排放量為6,190 kt CO-e。為了實現這一淨結果，658kt CO？-2E的碳信用額度已經報廢。2023年，伍德賽德？S總權益範圍1温室氣體排放的70%來自於燃料燃燒為我們的資產提供動力，22%來自於排氣，其中大部分與水庫CO？作為液化天然氣過程的一部分，8%來自燃燒。在上圖中，為實現與2023年的全年可比性，增加了必和必拓石油投資組合在合併前5個月的排放額度。我們2023年的總權益範圍1和2的排放量低於可比基準。通過與伍德賽德可比產品組合和產量的基準進行比較，可以 提供避免排放量的估計。有關估算的信息，請參見第16頁。1總範圍1和2排放強度是在應用補償之前對我們生產效率的衡量。這是證明伍德賽德在我們的設施中適當優先考慮避免和減少排放的一種方式。伍德賽德的總排放強度低於(高於)液化天然氣、常規大陸架和深水資產可比資產組合的全球平均水平，這表明了為避免和減少我們運營的排放而採取的行動的影響，以及我們石油和天然氣資源的內在特徵。1由於強大的可靠性表現，包括冥王星的減少等因素，2023年我們的總範圍1和2的排放強度有所改善。伍德賽德的甲烷排放強度低於(高於)行業(OGCI)目標，並制定了進一步改善和爭取接近零的甲烷排放的行動計劃。5伍德賽德？S甲烷排放業績和減少計劃見第23頁。甲烷排放對伍德賽德？S範圍1的排放有貢獻，但受到特別關注 ，因為它們對實現全球氣候目標具有近期重要性。我們的甲烷強度在2023年有所改善，原因包括減少冥王星的排放和減少生產、儲存和卸載(FPSO)設施的排放。1避免排放的量化本質上是不確定的。然而，可以通過與液化天然氣、常規大陸架和深水資產組合的基準進行比較來提供估計，這些資產的產量為187.2 Mboe(伍德賽德股權生產2023年)，產品組合與伍德賽德類似。有許多潛在的基準提供了對2023年全球石油和天然氣作業平均排放強度的估計。基於Wood Mackenzie？S排放基準工具， 估計避免排放量約為391kt CO-e，而根據國際能源署？S？石油和天然氣行業淨零過渡？表3.1中報告的行業平均排放量？(2023年11月)，估計避免的排放量約為1,705千噸CO-e。此圖中顯示的估算避免排放量代表兩個估計值之間的範圍。2伍德賽德沒有獨立核實這些估計背後的數據。2目標和期望是淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放量相對於6.32公噸CO-e的起始基數，這代表2016-2020年權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放的年平均總量，可根據生產或批准資產的潛在權益變化進行調整(上調或下調) 在2021年之前作出最終投資決定。淨股本排放量包括利用碳信用作為補償。3伍德賽德分析，基於2022年和2023年伍德賽德範圍1和2相對於液化天然氣、常規大陸架和深水資產可比投資組合的排放數據，根據Wood Mackenzie？S排放基準工具中報告的這些主要資源主題的2023年排放強度計算得出。4伍德賽德分析，基於2022年和2023年伍德賽德甲烷排放數據，相對於OGCI平均值和目標。Https://www.ogci.com/action-and-engagement/reducing-methane-emissions/#methane-target.5 OGMP，2023年。？實施計劃指南？，第2頁https://ogmpartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OGMP-2.0-Implementation-Plan-Guidance_2.pdf.OGMP提供了OGCI上游作業的集體平均目標，作為接近零的例子。排放強度。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司17

Net equity Scope 1 and 2: net zero action plan In 2023, we completed the development of decarbonisation plans across our merged portfolio of operated assets including identifying potential large scale opportunities to reduce emissions beyond 2030. DECARBONISATION PLANNING We have three ways to achieve our net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions reduction targets: avoiding emissions in the way we design facilities; reducing emissions in the way we operate; and both buying and originating carbon credits to utilise as offsets for the remainder. Our priority is to avoid and reduce emissions. All Woodside operated assets and projects must draw up decarbonisation plans to identify the technical opportunities to reduce emissions at the facility, so that the opportunities can be further assessed for engineering and commercial viability. Opportunities that are estimated to cost less than our internal long-term cost of carbon of $80/t CO -e (real terms 2022) are 2 incorporated into asset or project level business plans.1 These opportunities are at varying levels of maturity. To date: Opportunities that we estimate could avoid approximately 16 million tonnes CO -e (cumulatively to 2050) have been incorporated into the 2 design of the Scarborough, Pluto Train 2 and Trion projects;2,3 Around a further 70 opportunities, which we estimate could avoid approximately 12 million tonnes CO -e (cumulatively to 2050) are targeted for completion at our 2 existing facilities by 2030.2,3 We estimate that the opportunities still to be implemented at our existing operating facilities could have a combined capital cost of around $200 million.2,3 This does not include the cost of potential projects which we estimate to cost more than $80/t CO -e. Some of these may also be pursued following review by the Executive 2 Leadership Team ? such as the proposed Woodside Solar project. Other opportunities are pursued in an enterprise large scale abatement plan in order to reduce costs and/or improve maturity, so that they too can be considered for inclusion in asset level business plans. This large scale abatement plan is explained on the next pages. Asset decarbonisation: our progress and plans 2023 ? DELIVERED Completed the development of asset decarbonisation plans across full portfolio of operated assets. Opportunities costing $80/t CO -e: 2 Attention is focused on the assets with the longest remaining lifespan ? primarily the Pluto and Scarborough facilities. The 2024 scope of work at these facilities is to conclude engineering assessment of the technology options in order to select the preferred technology for application. 2025+ ? PLAN Following the selection of large scale abatement options we will undertake further design out engineering to reduce costs and emissions, seeking to advance towards ?FID-ready? status. Subject to FID, a scheduled maintenance shutdown at Pluto in 2030 presents the earliest potential window for implementation. Some projects will be accelerated ahead of this timeline ? e.g. the proposed Woodside Solar project. Woodside continues to progress commercial agreements, including for power transmission, to support the proposed project. 1 Woodside?s assumptions on carbon cost pricing include a long-term carbon price of US$80/tonne of emissions (real terms 2022). Woodside continues to monitor the uncertainty around climate change risks and will revise carbon pricing assumptions accordingly. 2 Indicative only, not guidance. Potential impact of opportunities identified in asset decarbonisation plans assuming all opportunities identified progress to execution, which is not certain and remains subject to further maturity of cost and engineering definition. Greenhouse gas quantities are estimated using engineering judgement by Woodside engineers. Please refer to section 7.6 ?Disclaimer, risks, emissions data and other important information? for important cautionary information relating to forward looking statements. 3 See announcement titled ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. Greenhouse gas emissions data including charts and estimates of future abatement plans in this Climate Transition Action Plan have not been updated to reflect changes in Woodside?s equity share of the Scarborough Joint Venture as a consequence of the sale of 15.1% interest to JERA. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 18

Potential pathway to net zero (equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions annual average Mtpa CO -e) at portfolio 1,2 2 of producing assets and sanctioned projects 8 6 4 2 0 2023 2024-2030 2031-2040 2041-2050 Opportunities in progress: emissions reduction Large scale abatement: Further engineering required Offsets3 Net emissions 2016-2020 starting base4 opportunities estimated to cost $80/t CO -e 2 NON OPERATED ASSETS Woodside?s Scope 1 and 2 targets are set on an equity basis. This means they apply to our share of the emissions from all projects that we participate in, irrespective of whether we operate the project, and in proportion to our economic interest. We share examples of emissions reduction initiatives being implemented on our assets with the Operator of non-operated assets at governance forums and joint venture technical committee meetings. Examples have included sharing knowledge about methane measurement (such as drone observation surveys) and reduction opportunities such as thermal oxidisers at the Wheatstone asset. We also discuss our approach to workforce engagement on decarbonisation and identification of opportunities. A list of our non-operated JVs is provided in the table (below) along with their Operator and a link to their website for further information about their approach.5 Non-operated Asset Woodside Operator Interest (for further information) Gippsland Basin Joint Venture6 50% ExxonMobil Kipper Unit Joint Venture7 32.5% (ExxonMobil.com) Mad Dog8 23.9% BP Atlantis9 44% (BP.com) 10 Chevron Wheatstone Project 13% (Chevron.com) 1 Indicative only, not guidance. Potential impact of opportunities identified in asset decarbonisation plans assuming all opportunities identified progress to execution, which is not certain and remains subject to further maturity of cost and engineering definition. Greenhouse gas quantities are estimated using engineering judgement by Woodside engineers. Please refer to section 7.6 ?Disclaimer, risks, emissions data and other important information? for important cautionary information relating to forward looking statements. See page 20 for further information about potential project opportunities that have not yet been sanctioned. 2 See announcement titled ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. Greenhouse gas emissions data including charts and estimates of future abatement plans in this Climate Transition Action Plan have not been updated to reflect changes in Woodside?s equity share of the Scarborough Joint Venture as a consequence of the sale of 15.1% interest to JERA. 3 Woodside?s approach to utilising carbon credits as offsets in the context of our pathway to net zero is discussed in Section 3.4. 4 The starting base has been calculated as 6.32 Mt CO?-e which is representative of the gross average annual equity emissions over the period 2016-2020 for both heritage Woodside and heritage BHP?s assets, and which may be adjusted (up or down) for potential equity changes in producing or sanctioned assets with a final investment decision prior to 2021. 5 During 2023, Woodside completed a transaction whereby Calgary-based Paramount Resources Ltd (Paramount) took a 50% equity interest in, and operatorship of, 28 leases of the Liard ?eld in Canada. Woodside retains a 50% equity interest in the leases. 6 Gippsland Basin Joint Venture ?elds lie in permits Vic/ L1-L11 and Vic/L13-20. 7 The Kipper ?eld lies in Australian offshore permits Vic/L9 and Vic/L25 8 The Mad Dog ?eld lies in the US Gulf of Mexico, within lease blocks GC738, GC781, GC782, GC824, GC825, GC826, GC868, GC869, and GC870. 9 The Atlantis ?eld lies in the US Gulf of Mexico, within lease blocks GC699, GC742, GC743, and GC744 10 Woodside?s 13% non-operated interest in the Wheatstone Project, which is offshore north western Australia, includes the offshore platform, the pipeline to shore and the onshore plant, but excludes the Wheatstone and Iago fields and associated subsea infrastructure. Woodside is Operator of the Julimar & Brunello fields which is a subsea development tie-back to the Wheatstone offshore platform and has a 65% interest in these fields. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 19

LARGE SCALE ABATEMENT Emissions reduction opportunities that are estimated to cost more than $80/t CO -e are reviewed by our Executive Leadership 2 Team.1 They are subject to more engineering, cost reduction or technology maturation in a company-wide large scale abatement plan, as depicted in the chart below. If they can be matured to an appropriate level, they will be reassessed by the Executive Leadership Team and progressed where appropriate. The proposed Woodside Solar project is an example of a project likely costing more than $80/t CO -e that is progressing. 2 Multiple opportunities have been identi?ed that could reduce the Scope 1 and 2 emissions from our current portfolio. LNG facilities are the source of the majority of our emissions. They arise from reservoir CO , power generation, mechanical turbines and our ?aring system 2 . Electri?cation (using renewable or lower carbon power), CCS and hydrogen fuelling of turbines are all options that could reduce these emissions, creating choices in the optimal mix. We estimate these large scale opportunities could potentially deliver approximately 35 million tonnes of additional cumulative Scope 1 and 2 emissions reductions through to 2050.2,3 These large scale abatement opportunities utilise existing technology but require substantial engineering to retro?t onto existing facilities. Because of this, they are currently estimated to cost signi?cantly more than our internal long-term cost of carbon of $80/t CO -e (real terms 2022).1 This means that we target where they can 2 have the highest impact, in particular at our Pluto and Scarborough facilities, which have the longest future life and therefore emissions pro?le in our current portfolio. The next stage of our planning process is to determine which of the multiple abatement options should be selected. These technologies are not certain to mature to a level of cost at which they could be implemented on the full scale depicted in the chart on page 19. Because of this and in order to pursue a cost effective approach to decarbonisation, they will also be compared with alternatives, such as new emerging technologies, or the use of carbon credits as offsets. If all current abatement efforts and future abatement pipeline opportunities are realised, residual emissions from our current portfolio could be approximately 0.3 Mtpa CO?-e in 2050, an approximately 95% reduction from our 2016-2020 starting base.2,3 ~90% of gross equity Scope 1 and 2 Abatement option for typical emission in 2050 are from LNG3,4 LNG emissions sources2 100 Mechanical drives Post combustion capture + carbon sequestration Electri?cation ~50% 75 Hydrogen fuelling + carbon sequestration Power generation Renewable power 50 Post combustion capture + carbon sequestration ~25% Oxyfuel combustion + carbon sequestration Reservoir CO 2 Carbon sequestration 25 ~15% Carbon to products ~10% Flaring Reduction or recovery 0 2023 2030 2040 2050 Non LNG % LNG Emissions % Marginal abatement cost curve2 Carbon price (US$/t) Large scale abatement | Multiple technology options >$80/t Priority is to reduce cost and mature engineering in order to make available for selection at facilities with the longest future operating life and greatest emissions reduction potential. Post Carbon Oxyfuel combustion capture and Renewable H2 Carbon combustion carbon utilisation power fuelling sequestration capture (CCU) US$80t/CO?-e long term cost of carbon Opportunities costing

DECARBONISATION AT FUTURE PROJECTS The same technologies and methods that are used in our asset decarbonisation plans and large scale abatement plan can also be incorporated into the planning for new projects. Because they do not need to be retro?tted onto existing facilities, these technologies are expected to be less expensive to deploy at new projects. The approach to decarbonisation is incorporated through the development planning cycle. For example, the proposed Browse development has CCS included in its reference case, and measures to reduce ?aring have been incorporated in the design of Trion. Emissions data is not incorporated into our reporting until the project is sufficiently mature for its ?nancial information and production forecasting to be included in our business plan. RISKS TO ACHIEVING THE TARGETS Whilst we have identi?ed a technical pathway to residual levels of emissions and have started implementation via our asset decarbonisation plans, there are risks to delivery. These include: Securing approvals, for example from regulators or joint venture partners. Ability to reduce costs. Proof of technology in the speci?c application at our facilities. Integration of new designs into existing brown?eld facilities. These risks are mitigated by the ability to meet our targets through the additional use of carbon credits. Our use of carbon credits, including the steps we take to manage associated risks, is further described in section 3.4. FOCUS ON ACTION The following pages provide case studies about aspects of how we avoid and reduce emissions at our facilities: Pages Asset decarbonisation in practice 22 Methane emissions management 23 Large scale abatement: vision for Pluto 24-25 Decarbonisation technology development 6-27 Pluto LNG?s long future life means the potential for emissions savings make it a priority for the development of large scale abatement. 1 Woodside?s assumptions on carbon cost pricing include a long-term carbon price of US$80/ tonne of emissions (real terms 2022). Woodside continues to monitor the uncertainty around climate change risks and will revise carbon pricing assumptions accordingly. 2 Indicative only, not guidance. Graphic outlines future decarbonisation options currently being considered. Opportunities may or may not eventuate. Please refer to section 7.6 ?Disclaimer, risks, emissions data and other important information? for important cautionary information relating to forward looking statements. 3 Indicative only. Scope 1 and 2 estimates are based on equity share of current portfolio of operating and sanctioned projects. 4 See announcement titled ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. Greenhouse gas emissions data including charts and estimates of future abatement plans in this Climate Transition Action Plan have not been updated to reflect changes in Woodside?s equity share of the Scarborough Joint Venture as a consequence of the sale of 15.1% interest to JERA. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 21

Asset decarbonisation in practice1 DESIGN OUT / AVOID Lower Carbon Power: Pluto2 We modi?ed the Pluto LNG plant to receive power from the proposed Woodside Solar project. The modi?cations are substantially complete, ready for grid connection from 2024. We expect to import 50 MW of solar power from 2026, subject to FID. Estimated emissions reduction: 150 ktpa CO?-e Flaring minimisation: Trion We installed gas recovery systems associated with tanks and ?are to minimise ?aring. Estimated emissions reduction:3 52.4 ktpa CO?-e Energy efficiency: Trion We modi?ed the redundancy for power generation to keep back up generators on standby. Estimated emissions reduction:3 31.6 ktpa CO?-e OPERATE OUT / REDUCE Operating Practices Plant Modi?cations Reliability improvement: Pluto Energy Efficiency: Karratha Gas Plant We addressed extreme ambient temperature We increased the utilisation of the highest impacts on equipment reliability, for example efficiency generators on site by modifying installing shading and evaporative misting power cable operating envelopes. sprays. These and other actions contributed Estimated emissions reduction: to us avoiding signi?cant extreme heat related 43 ktpa CO?-e reliability events in 2023. Estimated emissions reduction:4 129 ktpa CO?-e Flaring minimisation: Angostura Flaring minimisation: Shenzi We updated and implemented 12 standing We installed a low emission ?are tip to reduce operational procedures to minimise gas ?aring low and high pressure ?are purge rates. during facility startup. Estimated emissions reduction: Estimated emissions reduction: 2.4 ktpa CO?-e 26.5 ktpa CO?-e Methane: Pluto Flaring minimisation: Ngujima-Yin We tested the regenerative thermal oxidizer We installed a parallel strainer and are now able (RTO) at various temperatures to investigate to clean blockages online and eliminate the methane destruction efficiency. Work is now associated ?aring. Suction strainer blockages ongoing to amend the operating parameters previously required 10 hours of ?aring while the to achieve the optimal temperature and deliver strainers were cleaned. the emissions reduction potential. Estimated emissions reduction: Estimated emissions reduction: 49 ktpa CO?-e 6.0 ktpa CO?-e 1 The Scope 1 and 2 emissions reductions are estimated using engineering judgment by appropriately skilled and experienced Woodside engineers. All examples are for gross emission reductions, not equity share. 2 Implementation is subject to commercial arrangements, regulatory & JV approvals and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). 3 Trion?s emissions reduction has been estimated as an average over a 27-year design life. Carbon intensity of the field will not be uniform across each year of expected field life. 4 Emissions reduction re?ects comparison to ambient temperature reliability events in 2022 before implementation of extreme heat readiness protocols and may not be realised every year. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 22

Methane emissions management In January 2024, Woodside joined the UN Environment Programme?s (UNEP) flagship reporting and mitigation program, the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP 2.0). Methane management plan: 2023 progress Methane emissions management is an important part of global efforts to limit climate change because it has a higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide, especially in the near term, and is estimated to have made the second largest contribution to human-induced climate change after carbon dioxide. Woodside?s reported methane emissions are around 0.1% of production by volume. This calculation is supported by our improving ability to directly monitor and measure methane at our facilities. It is lower than the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) 2025 target of below 0.2%.1 It re?ects our long standing focus on reducing methane leaks, which if they occur at sufficient volume would be a loss to our production and a potential safety hazard. We continue to strive for further reductions through our methane plan (2023 progress against four pillars of the plan is shown on the right). When we assess emissions reduction opportunities, we multiply our internal long-term cost of carbon of $80/t CO -e (real terms 2022) by 84 (an effective price for 2 methane of $6,720/t) to align with the higher global warming potential of methane in the near term. MEASURE We are improving our ability to measure methane emissions. In 2023 we: Built and maintained a database of methane emissions sources, con?rmed with selected site measurements across all operated assets. Trialled a spectrometric aerial methane measurement technique at onshore facilities. Conducted methane point source detection and quanti?cation trials from two satellite vendors to test capability. Completed strategic drone surveys trialling the use of CO /CH ratios for combustion assessment 2 4 . Piloted several fugitive detection tools including quanti?ed optical gas imaging. Partnered with the University of Western Australia to prototype novel methane sensors. REDUCE We are taking action to reduce methane emissions to near-zero at our operated assets by prioritising the mitigation of our most material sources.2 In 2023 we took action to reduce methane emissions by 2.0 ktpa including:3 Performance optimisation of wet gas seals on two boil off gas (BOG) compressors, estimated saving of 1.5 ktpa of methane. Recti?cation of a trunkline fugitive leak at the Karratha Gas Plant onshore terminal, estimated saving of 0.3 ktpa of methane. Automation of a manual venting procedure on three acid gas removal units, estimated saving of 0.2 ktpa of methane. REPORT We aim to report our methane emissions data accurately and transparently. In 2023 we: Conducted surveys which support our calculation that our methane emissions are around 0.1% (of production by volume), consistent with historical aerial (top down) and point source (bottom up) site measurements. Engaged with Australia?s Climate Change Authority to support improvement of methane reporting regulations In 2024, we joined the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) 2.0 to support transparent methane emissions reporting. LEAD We support the adoption of methane best practice across industry through leadership, advocacy and collaboration. In 2023 we: Led the Methane Guiding Principles ?Global Midstream Initiative?. Joined the ASEAN Methane Leadership Program to share methane reduction learnings. Sponsored the ?rst technical workshop of the Australian Energy Producers methane taskforce. Collaborated with researchers conducting science studies as part of UNEP?s International Methane Emissions Observatory?s efforts to fill knowledge gaps in methane emissions. Shared knowledge on methane management through a presentation and journal article publication at the 2023 Australian Energy Producers conference. Presented and participated in panels at the Global Methane Summit and International Gas Union conference. 1 OGCI, 2024. https://www.ogci.com/action-and-engagement/reducing-methane-emissions/#methane-target. 2 OGMP, 2023. ?Implementation Plan Guidance?, p. 2 https://ogmpartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OGMP-2.0-Implementation-Plan-Guidance_2.pdf. OGMP provides the OGCI collective average target for upstream operations as an example of ?near zero? emissions intensity. 3 The methane emissions reductions are estimated using engineering judgment by appropriately skilled and experienced Woodside engineers. All examples are for gross emission reductions, not equity share. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 23

大規模減排：冥王星淨零1冥王星液化天然氣的願景？其長期的未來壽命意味着減排的潛力使其成為發展大規模減排的優先事項。減少機會：提供的能源效率：？高效空氣？安裝在燃氣輪機上的？ 優化？發電運營策略？冥王星列車1號運行壓力增加？冥王星水處理降低了最低夜牀率？改進的空氣冷卻器？n風扇葉片擴口：？專注於高可靠性操作以減少？aring ？運行雙蒸發氣體壓縮機以減少？？與裝載甲烷有關的船舶：？壓縮機密封排氣口路由至？系統？多模式現場調查和對散逸性甲烷減排的補救機會：正在 進展中的能源效率：用於22列渦輪壓縮機驅動器的航空衍生渦輪機驅動優化級聯工藝，具有入口空氣冷卻和低NOx？第2列的技術為第2列的小型壓縮機選擇電驅動器與現有的第1列系統集成的第2列電源供應燃氣渦輪機廢熱回收流動塗層幹線減少粗糙度電池儲能系統燃燒：火炬尖端更換和燃燒系統升級氮氣？ 清除甲烷：安裝了熱氧化器以去除廢物流中的甲烷未來潛力從長遠來看，？更低碳發電和CCUS可以支持大規模減排。3機械驅動（燃氣輪機）和發電 佔冥王星排放的大部分。包括氫燃料和/或燃燒後碳捕集在內的技術的整合可以大大減少這些排放。在2023年的轉折期間安裝連接也使 冥王星？CCU準備好了嗎？通過將一氧化碳轉化為可銷售產品，創造附加價值的潛力。2這些選擇在技術上或經濟上都不一定會進行。在注重成本效益的情況下，它們還將與替代品進行比較， 例如新興技術，或使用碳信用額作為抵消。1冥王星淨零排放願景是目前正在考慮的一系列未來潛在脱碳減排方案，以潛在地減少陸上 冥王星液化天然氣設施的淨排放。備選方案只是概念性的，可能會有所改變。圖像不按比例繪製，實施取決於技術成熟度、技術和商業可行性、商業安排、監管和合資企業批准以及 第三方活動（可能會進行也可能不會進行）。2有關康菲石油優化級聯工藝的更多信息，請訪問www.example.com。3請參見術語表 以瞭解de？伍德賽德如何使用低碳一詞。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 24

Pluto未來願景：減少機遇 實現能源效率的提高和？在現有基礎設施中減少甲烷和甲烷。我們將繼續致力於進一步改善這些領域。正在進行中，為Scarborough 和Pluto Train 2設施的卓越調試和啟動做好準備，包括提供設計出的減排機會。未來潛力1可再生能源輸入電網連接，在發電廠以上需求時，可輸入可再生能源或輸出低碳電力。 低碳發電含氧燃料熱發電，連接CCS集輸系統。儲能系統可再生能源？rming。電動機輔助LNG壓縮機輔助電機，最大限度地利用低碳能源。氫氣 混合到渦輪機燃料中使用CCS進行氣體重整。碳捕集和利用（CCU）將一氧化碳轉化為可銷售的產品，如乙醇2或蛋白質。燃燒後碳捕集從燃氣輪機排氣中捕集和處理CO，以輸出至CCS 集氣系統2. 1冥王星淨零願景是目前正在考慮的一系列未來潛在脱碳減排方案，以潛在地減少陸上冥王星液化天然氣設施的淨排放。選項僅為概念性的， 可能會發生變化。圖像不按比例繪製，實施取決於技術成熟度、技術和商業可行性、商業安排、監管和合資企業批准以及第三方活動（可能會進行也可能不會進行）。 伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 25

脱碳技術開發Woodside看到了一條潛在的途徑，通過利用已在其他地方成功部署的現有成熟技術，到2050年或更早實現我們的淨零排放目標。但是復古的價格貴嗎？我們的工程 重點是降低成本。新技術也在不斷湧現，它們有可能在不同的時間框架內取代我們當前計劃中的機會。Woodside正在努力使技術成熟，並推動其成本的逐步變化， 使其成為可行的選項，可以在不同的時間範圍內進行部署。與Heliogen合作開發可再生能源技術，以推進更長時間的可再生能源。其中包括加州的商業規模示範工廠 Capella項目。混合燃料H2燃燒我們正在與貝克休斯合作，旨在鑑定一種在燃氣輪機中使用氫氣的技術和途徑，而無需昂貴的基礎設施更換。 氧燃燒技術我們正在努力？有幾家公司要審查開發發電技術，通過燃燒天然氣和2個接近純氧，實現高濃度CO 捕集，可實現90%以上的CO捕集效率。2監測甲烷監測我們正在與供應商合作，測試一系列技術，以準確測量各種來源的甲烷排放量，如？排放，排放和逃逸排放。我們的目標是使用自上而下和自下而上的方法來檢測和減少這些排放，包括無人機、機器人，？固定的設備，手持設備，衞星圖像。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 26

Carbon Capture, Utilisation and storage (CCUS) Carbon Capture We are evaluating options to retro?t carbon capture technologies to LNG plants, so we can select high-efficiency, low-operational cost, and small-footprint options. Post Combustion Capture We are investigating technologies from companies that use novel solvent chemistries and other process intensi?cation methods to enable the point source capture of CO from the combustion of natural2 gas and other fuels. These novel solvents aim to improve the efficiency of CO capture from ?ue gases with2 low CO concentrations, and reduce both 2 the equipment size and energy input, making it potentially feasible to retro?t existing plants with carbon capture. Decarbonisation Accelerator We are creating a new Decarbonisation Accelerator in partnership with Rice University to increase the utilisation pathways of CO? using plasma chemistry. Carbon Capture and Utilisation Our collaboration with companies, such as Lanzatech, NovoNutrients, and StringBio, aims to accelerate the development or carbon capture and utilisation technologies, ahead of potential deployment on a larger scale. Carbon Sequestration Monitoring and Modelling We are working with the SEG Advanced Modeling Corporation?s CO Sequestration Project to model 2 injection risk, plume migration, and induced seismicity of CO injection into a reservoir. 2 By comparing this modelling to real-time monitoring using ?bre optic and in wellbore seismic measurement, we hope to ultimately reduce the long-term operational cost and improve safety aspects of CCS projects. Direct Air Capture We are the largest industrial partner in the Australian Research Council (ARC) Research Hub for carbon utilisation and recycling. Systems integration and commercialisation Trailblazer We are developing a research commercialisation hub with Curtin University, the University of Queensland and James Cook University, and 30 company partners. The Trailblazer program is focused on turning academic research into breakthrough services, products and businesses, particularly in critical minerals and hydrogen. Climatetech Incubator We are a Founding Partner for the Houston expansion of Greentown Labs, the largest climatech startup incubator in North America. We are participating with the intent of adopting emerging startup technologies into our operations. Energy Partnership We have renewed our strategic partnership with Monash University. It has three pillars: affordable bulk clean energy; carbon abatement; and thought leadership. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 27

Carbon credits Investing in carbon credits contributes to preserving the world?s carbon budget, by accelerating emissions reduction, avoidance and removal activities that would not otherwise have taken place. ? Tree planting as part of the Woodside Native Reforestation Project. ROLE OF CARBON CREDITS IN OUR DECARBONISATION PLANS Woodside utilises certified carbon credits to offset equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions that are above our targets in a given year after design out and operate out measures have been taken. The availability of carbon credits to offset emissions is important because: gross emissions can fluctuate, for example, due to portfolio change or for operational reasons, asset decarbonisation plans can take time to implement, especially where they are large scale or complex engineering projects, and some decarbonisation technologies may prove too expensive to implement efficiently. The ability to utilise carbon credits means that we can maintain our target trajectory and continue to reduce our net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions, despite these variable factors. Like our asset decarbonisation plans, our portfolio of carbon credits enables our base business to manage the price risk associated with regulations and our corporate net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions targets. Carbon credits are available now and can be used in the short and medium term for emissions that are otherwise not technically or economically viable to avoid or reduce.1 OUR PORTFOLIO APPROACH We established a Carbon Business in 2018 in order to develop a portfolio of carbon credits and our skills and expertise in managing carbon credit integrity. Since then we have invested more than $150 million, with approximately one third of that spend focused on the origination of our own projects, and the remainder on purchase of credits.2,3,4,5 Today, Woodside manages a portfolio of more than 20 million carbon credits, which it has acquired with an average cost of supply of less than $20/t.3,5 Over time we are increasing our focus on project origination as this enables us to better manage the cost and integrity of our carbon credits. In 2023, Woodside planted approximately 2.7 million mixed biodiverse seedlings in Western Australia as part of our Native Reforestation Project across approximately 4,700 ha of land at Woodside owned properties.6 In Senegal, Woodside is funding the restoration of up to 7,000 hectares of mangroves in the Sine Saloum and Casamance regions. Woodside is expected to receive up to 1.4 million carbon credits from this project over 30 years. A wide range of activities can generate carbon credits. These activities can be categorised into avoidance/reduction (e.g. land?ll gas capture or renewable energy) or removal (e.g. reforestation) activities. *All footnotes related to this page are displayed on the next page. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 28

雖然在近期至中期內，避免和減少信貸仍將佔投資組合的很大份額，但我們計劃隨着時間的推移增加清除信貸的比例，以支持我們的淨零目標。我們目前擁有並將目標維持一個由50%基於自然的 清除信用（例如生物封存）組成的投資組合。我們也認識到，長期存儲將變得越來越重要。我們認識到，使用碳信用額作為抵消受到了一些團體的批評，如果這些批評得不到迴應， 可能會對其持續的可接受性構成風險。我們相信，這些風險可以通過我們計劃評估誠信和管理多樣化信貸組合的方式來減輕。Woodside訂閲新興的獨立碳信用評級 平臺，評估碳信用的完整性。我們亦會在制定方法時監察獨立機構制定的誠信評估框架及標準的演變。我們的方法受到當前和新興的 外部框架的影響，如自願碳市場誠信委員會（ICVCM）？氣候變化投資者組織的核心碳原則？s（IGCC）？7，8，9在我們的設施中優先避免和減少排放我們的首要任務是避免和減少排放。例如，我們尋求機會，在設計和運營我們的資產時，當使用內部長期碳成本（目前為80美元/噸二氧化碳當量（2022年實際價值）進行評估時，這些資產在經濟上是可行的。這超過了目前碳信用額的市場價格2。在清潔能源監管機構於二零二三年十二月公佈的季度市場報告中，澳大利亞碳信用單位（ACCU）的通用現貨價格約為31. 25澳元（約21美元）。 雖然我們優先考慮避免和減少設施的排放，但碳排放額度仍然是實現我們公司目標和監管需求的重要選擇，直至2030年（如果需要）。到目前為止，我們已經獲得了到2030年預期ACCU需求的90%以上，並制定了一個規劃。否則在技術上或經濟上都不可行，以避免或減少？我們指的是使用 碳信用額來處理在之後仍然高於我們的目標的排放量？designout？然後呢？手術了嗎我們的內部碳價格為80美元/噸CO—E（2022年實際價格）。 22投資金額為於二零二三年十二月三十一日之前就市場購買碳信用額及Woodside開發的碳來源項目產生的税前開支。分配至範圍1和範圍2排放的碳信用額投資不會有助於實現我們的範圍3投資目標。本報告中引用的1.5億美元碳信用額度投資未歸因於本報告中3.35億美元的範圍3投資目標更新。3投資組合數量不包括碳信用額（持有並預期收到）來自Woodside Pluto碳抵消 由Woodside Burght Pty Ltd.持有的項目階段1—4。4起源指Woodside或第三方項目開發商開發的碳抵消項目，其特徵在於（i）Woodside提供前期投資或資金；（ii） Woodside是項目的多數參與者或項目的碳信用額接受者（或兩者兼有）；及（iii）Woodside接受與碳信用額交付有關的風險。5碳投資組合是動態的。方法、 和地理位置可能會發生變化。投資組合數量包括持有的澳大利亞碳信用單位和自願碳市場信用，並預計將根據或與以下各項相關交付或產生至2050年：（i）2023年12月31日之前訂立的第三方合同；或（ii）2023年12月31日之前購買土地的伍德賽德起源項目。該公司在沒有風險的基礎上報告了。無風險量不包括對此類量的調整，以重新？排除 任何無法交付的風險。投資組合數量不包括已退休的單位。Woodside不就投資組合中碳信用額度的緩解影響提出任何索賠，除非且直到某個信用額度被收回或放棄（從 循環中取出，並且不能再出售）。6該項目有可能在25年內封存約2,000千噸CO？-E。？核心碳原則？，https://icvcm.org/the-core-carbon-principles/.8 IGCC，2022年。？企業環境轉型計劃：投資者預期指南？， https://igcc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/IGCC-corporate-transition-plan-investor-expectations.pdf.牛津大學，2020年。？《牛津淨零對齊碳補償原則》， https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-01/Oxford-Offsetting-Principles-2020.pdf.2023年，10 CER。？十二月？碳市場季度報告？2023年9月季度？， https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Infohub/Markets/quarterly-carbon-market-reports.11捲包括Woodside Burrup Pty Ltd.持有的Woodside Pluto碳抵消項目階段1-4的碳信用(持有並預計將收到)的伍德賽德股權。12參見伍德賽德將向jera出售15.1%斯卡伯勒權益？(2024年2月23日)的公告。本氣候過渡行動計劃中的温室氣體排放數據(包括圖表和未來減排計劃的估計)尚未更新，以反映由於向JERA出售15.1%的權益而導致伍德賽德？S在斯卡伯勒合資企業中的股權份額的變化。

One carbon credit is intended to represent a tonne of emissions avoided, reduced or removed outside of our facilities.1 Because of the importance of carbon credit integrity, Woodside applies our own additional assessment to our carbon credits portfolio. This is summarised in the table below. Tree planting as part of Woodside?s Native Reforestation Project 2020—2023 Integrity assessment for carbon credits2 Abatement is demonstrably We examine whether the credit represents emissions reductions or removals additional that would not have occurred in the absence of a carbon market, for example, by scrutinising the ?additionality approach? applied by the project. High likelihood of permanence We assess the permanence of abatement that a credit represents including consideration of permanence periods, risk of reversal and adequacy of buffer pools. Accurate quanti?cation We form an independent view of the risk of over-crediting by evaluating factors such of abatement as baseline conservatism, monitoring requirements and calculation values. Recognised standards body1 We source credits issued by established standards bodies that independently verify and issue credits. Our current portfolio is sourced from the Australian Carbon Credit Scheme, Verra and Gold Standard. Mitigation against leakage We evaluate whether the carbon project could result in increased emissions outside of the project boundary, for example, by analysing common land usage within the broader geographic region. Vintage We aim to retire credits with a vintage with a maximum of ?ve years between the abatement activity and emissions. Environmental and social Woodside assesses the overall environmental and social performance of a carbon performance project and prioritises projects that have bene?ts such as land restoration and employment opportunities for local communities. Location and methodology We take a portfolio approach to managing regulatory risk and carbon credit acceptability, aiming for carbon credit methodology and geographical diversi?cation. 1 The measurement, veri?cation and reporting of the abatement is prescribed and administered by independently managed Standards (such as Verra or Gold Standard), or by Regulators through legislation (such as the Australian Clean Energy Regulator through the Carbon Farming Initiative Act). 2 Informed by standards such as the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) Core Carbon Principles. https://icvcm.org/the-core-carbon-principles/. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 30

伍德賽德？碳信用投資組合1，2未退休碳信用投資組合 伍德賽德投資組合？s投資組合按註冊表～20MT

3.5範圍3排放範圍3排放對 Woodside很重要，因為它們是我們客户和供應商的範圍1和2排放。範圍3的排放發生在我們的價值鏈內，但在我們的運營之外。例如，供應商的排放量？在向我們提供商品和 服務時，或從客户那裏進行的活動？當他們使用我們的產品時。隨着我們的客户脱碳，他們可能無法再以同樣的方式或 同樣的成本使用我們的產品（供應商可能無法向我們交付產品）。因此，範圍3排放是一個指南，如何我們的客户？S和供應商？我們的脱碳可能會影響我們的業務。衡量範圍3排放風險的一個指標是我們產品組合的生命週期強度（範圍1、2和3排放，我們生產和銷售的每單位（兆焦耳）能源）。伍德賽德？由於我們的投資組合對天然氣的權重，其強度低於石油和天然氣行業的平均水平。Woodside計劃通過以下方式管理其對範圍3排放的敞口 ：評估我們的投資對能源轉型的彈性。我們的方法將在第42頁開始的資本分配一節中作更全面的介紹。通過投資於新能源產品和低碳 服務，使我們的產品組合多樣化，以避免或減少客户排放。支持我們的客户和供應商減少排放，並達到範圍1或2的目標。促進一致的全球排放量計量和報告。氣體用於各種 高温工業過程，如鐵和鋁生產。範圍1、2、3生命週期強度1 Woodside？由於與必和必拓合併整整一年的影響，2023年的強度有所增加？美國的石油業務， 石油相對較多，但仍低於（好於）行業平均水平。伍德賽德？氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告1伍德賽德分析，基於伍德賽德範圍1、2和3的2023年排放數據，相對於過渡 路徑倡議石油和天然氣部門平均評估日期2023年6月30日。https：//www. transitionpathwayinitiation.org.伍德賽德能源集團有限公司32

上游範圍3排放 供應商向我們提供貨物和服務時產生的排放木材作業下游範圍3排放將我們的產品運送給客户以及客户使用時產生的排放。員工通勤商務差旅運營產生的廢物採購 貨物和服務（貿易碳氫化合物除外）（貿易碳氫化合物）選定的其他上游（運輸和分銷）1，728 ktCO_e銷售產品的使用（Woodside生產） 64，612 ktCO_—e銷售產品的使用（第三方生產）5，041 ktCO_—e此圖顯示Woodside？2023年範圍3排放，按類別分列。超過95%的伍德賽德？s範圍3的排放被分類為？銷售產品的使用？這些 排放不包括伍德賽德的排放？分類為範圍1排放的直接操作，或分類為範圍2排放的與使用進口電力有關的排放。2023年：總權益範圍1排放量為 6，172 ktCO—e。總權益範圍2排放量為18噸二氧化碳當量。所有數據均以權益份額為基礎。上圖顯示了Woodside範圍1、2和3的排放。更多信息見第72—73頁的數據表。伍德賽德？氣候變遷 行動計劃與2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司33

3.6 Scope 3 targets In 2023, we continued to review our approach to Scope 3 targets in response to investor feedback and have decided to supplement our existing investment target with a new complementary emissions abatement target. Our Scope 3 approach includes the introduction of new products and services into our portfolio, like hydrogen and CCUS. These products and services can help our customers avoid or reduce their Scope 1 or 2 emissions and therefore reduce the life cycle (Scopes 1, 2 and 3) emissions intensity of our portfolio. For example, products like hydrogen have the potential to increase our sales of energy, without materially adding to the Scope 3 emissions from their use. Customers of CCUS have the potential to reduce their Scope 1 emissions, adding negative emissions to our value chain. The investment target tracks our work to develop these projects and bring them to market. The emissions abatement target will track the potential impact of these projects on customer emissions. SCOPE 3 INVESTMENT TARGET1 In 2021, Woodside set a Scope 3 investment target ? aiming to invest $5 billion in new energy products and lower carbon services by 2030.2 At the end of 2023, we have cumulatively spent more than $335 million towards this target. 2023 expenditure increased over 135% compared to 2022. We expect expenditure to continue to ramp up towards the back end of the target period, subject to markets developing, because most project expenditure occurs in the construction phase. SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS ABATEMENT TARGET1 Woodside has now also set a related Scope 3 emissions abatement target, to indicate the potential abatement impact of these products and services upon customer Scope 1 or 2 emissions. This target is to take ?nal investment decisions on new energy products and lower carbon services by 2030, with total abatement capacity of 5 Mtpa CO -e. 2 The customers for these products and services may be the same as the customers of our oil and gas business, directly substituting their energy for new products or directly abating the associated emissions. They may also be customers of the new products and services, without also being customers of oil and gas. Our methodology for reporting emissions in these different circumstances is described on page 75-76. SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS Investment target1 Emissions abatement target1 Investment in new energy Take FID on new energy products products and lower carbon and lower carbon services by 2030, services by 2030 with total abatement capacity of $ 5BILLION2 5MTPA CO?-e3 1 Scope 3 targets are subject to commercial arrangements, commercial feasibility, regulatory and Joint Venture approvals, and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). Individual investment decisions are subject to Woodside?s investment targets. Not guidance. Potentially includes both organic and inorganic investment. 2 Includes pre-RFSU spend on new energy products and lower carbon services that can help our customers decarbonise by using these products and services. It is not used to fund reductions of Woodside?s net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions which are managed separately through asset decarbonisation plans. 3 Includes binding and non-binding opportunities in the portfolio, subject to commercial arrangements, commercial feasibility, regulatory and Joint Venture approvals, and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). Individual investment decisions are subject to Woodside?s investment targets. Not guidance. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 34

天然氣是生產氨的原料，氨在農業中用於 化肥。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 35

New energy products Woodside is developing new energy products that can supply energy to customers with lower carbon emissions at the point of use than oil and gas products. HYDROGEN New energy products such as hydrogen (and hydrogen derivatives such as ammonia) can help customers to avoid emissions at the point of use by switching from unabated fossil-fuels. The expected uses of hydrogen include: Heavy duty road transportation: diesel substitution where hydrogen can offer operational bene?ts compared to battery electric trucks; Power: decarbonising coal-?red power (e.g. ammonia blends) and ?rming renewables in the grid; Shipping and aviation fuels: substitution for marine diesel and aviation fuel; Industrials and chemicals: producing heat for high temperature processes and as a chemical feedstock. We estimate that a tonne of hydrogen when used instead of diesel in trucking would avoid 11.2 tCO -e. Ammonia is heavier than liquid hydrogen and is less energy 2 dense on a mass basis. A tonne of ammonia used instead of marine fuel oil would avoid 1.5 tCO -e, and a tonne of ammonia displacing coal in 2 power generation would avoid 2.0 tCO -e.1 2 Progress in securing hydrogen offtake has been slower than originally anticipated. However, our con?dence in the growth of its role in the energy transition remains. Woodside is evaluating the recent hydrogen Production Tax Credit guidance provided by the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS).2 As currently drafted, the proposed rules will make it more challenging for companies to develop electrolysis-based hydrogen projects. Woodside intends to propose revisions to the proposed rules. Engineering progress is being made on a number of proposed opportunities as shown in the table on the next page. Woodside will not proceed beyond ?FID-ready? until we have sufficient confidence (e.g. in offtake) that an opportunity is compatible with our capital allocation framework.3 Woodside?s capital allocation framework is described on page 49. RENEWABLES Woodside is working to mature a range of renewable opportunities. These include the proposed Woodside Solar project which in Phase 1 is targeting the reduction of Woodside Scope 1 emissions from the Pluto LNG facility, and could expand to include third party sales. Woodside has a technology development collaboration with Heliogen to advance longer duration renewable power. The collaboration includes delivery of a commercial scale demonstration plant in California known as Project Capella. Woodside is also evaluating early-stage onshore wind opportunities in Western Australia and Queensland to support our new energy plans. Projected low carbon hydrogen demand growth (Mtpa)4 1 Hydrogen can be produced from fossil fuels (e.g. natural gas reforming) with emissions potentially abated (e.g. through CCUS) or by electrolysis including but not necessarily with renewable electricity. Emissions from the production of hydrogen that are not abated would be Scope 1 or 2 emissions for the hydrogen producer. In Woodside?s case they would therefore be subject to Woodside?s net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions targets. Scope 3 emissions displacement reductions are estimated using engineering judgment by appropriately skilled and experienced Woodside engineers. 2 IRS, 2023. ?Section 45V Credit for Production of Clean Hydrogen; Section 48(a)(15) Election To Treat Clean Hydrogen Production Facilities as Energy Property?, https://www.federalregister.gov/ documents/2023/12/26/2023-28359/section-45v-credit-for-production-of-clean-hydrogen-section-48a15-election-to-treat-clean-hydrogen. 3 A project is considered FID-ready if it has completed all the necessary studies, permits and designs so that a ?nal investment decision can be made. This decision is made based on a range of ?nancial, technical and strategic factors, and is a requirement for construction and implementation of a project to commence. 4 Source: Wood Mackenzie Lens Hydrogen, October 2023. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 36

機會更新：新能源氫氣和氨 可再生能源美國墨西哥灣沿岸氫氣加油商Southern Green提議的機會1 H2 OK機會H2 Perth@H2 Perth H2 TAS氫Capella描述商業規模。商業規模。商業規模。自含式氫氣商業規模。 商業規模。工業規模可再生氫(來自制氫制氨、儲存可再生氫可再生氫示範項目電解)2.氣體重整(帶CCS)從天然氣生產和加氣站。和氨(來自)和氨(來自氦。人工智能啟用和/或電解。重整(使用CCS)和/或可再生氫(來自電解).2.電解).2.集中太陽能或電解.3.電解).目標市場國內重型出口國內市場重型國內市場國內市場示範項目關税運輸和出口關税運輸以及出口和出口地點阿德莫爾，俄克拉何馬州，美國墨西哥灣，美國珀斯，西澳大利亞州珀斯，西澳大利亞州貝爾灣區南區，加利福尼亞州，美國塔斯馬尼亞州新西蘭土地？？(購買)正在進行？？(選擇租賃)正在進行？？(選擇租賃)正在進行？？(選擇購買)水電？4正在進行中？前端工程？正在進行的概念定義？概念定義？設計(進料前)2022年6月開始2021年12月開始2022年11月前端工程？7？設計(FEED)監管審批5正在進行技術準備？？7正在進行以支持FID6正在進行的商業準備FID 2023年5月不適用演示以支持FID6項目的潛在規模8至60噸/日的氫氣。日產量高達4,000噸，初期日產量高達2,700噸，氨日產量高達550噸。高達1,400噸/日的5兆瓦聚光太陽能230噸/年的CO？-E示蹤器氨。2,020 ktpa氨(第一階段)。每天0.2tpd的氫氣，270ktpa的CO？-e示波器3氨(100%份額).9火力。3避免排放。CO？-E範圍3排放1,360 ktpa CO？-E範圍3擴大到避免排放的可能性。700 ktpa CO？-E範圍3避讓。避免排放 。1 tpd。1 ktpa CO？-E範圍排放避免(100%3排放避免此表提供了有關我們目前投資組合中的擬議新能源機會的信息。它們處於不同的成熟階段，可能不會全部進入投資決策階段。我們還在努力開發這裏沒有顯示的更多機會。此表的目的是展示我們正在尋求多個機會作為我們管理風險的方法的一部分 以實現我們的範圍3目標。1建議的機會取決於商業安排、商業可行性、監管和合資企業的批准，以及第三方活動(可能進行也可能不進行)。個人投資 以伍德賽德？S的投資目標為準。而不是指導。機遇號建議使用來自可再生能源的電網電力，並採購可再生能源證書，以減少剩餘的排放。3對於H2 Perth的電解組件，H2 Perth建議在第一階段使用80%的可再生電力，到2040年整個設施的可再生電力逐步達到100%。4伍德賽德同意了權力的初步條款，但 根據最近的愛爾蘭共和軍指導草案進行了進一步審查。5監管審批正在進行中嗎？申請文件正在編制或已提交監管機構審批，但尚未做出最終決定的 。6如果一個項目已經完成和/或獲得了必要的研究、許可和設計，以便作出投資決定，則該項目被視為FID準備就緒。這一決定是基於一系列財務、技術和戰略因素作出的，是項目開始建設和實施的要求。7項工作進展充分，足以支持2023年5月進行的FID，然而，技術工作正在進行設計優化。8項目 容量有待進一步設計。範圍3排放避免的潛在規模是由具有適當技能和經驗的工程師利用工程判斷來估計的。伍德賽德假設通過為國內重型運輸市場置換柴油和通過為所有其他市場置換船用燃料油(低硫燃料油)來估計每個項目的避免排放量。實際置換排放可能會根據實際使用案例而有所不同。 9伍德賽德？S在南方綠色氫氣的股權有待最終敲定商業協議。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司37

低碳服務伍德賽德正在開發可減少客户排放的低碳服務。碳捕獲和儲存CCS是一項成熟的技術，代表了一種經過驗證的減少大規模工業排放的解決方案。像CCS這樣的服務可以幫助客户減少他們在使用Woodside產品(或來自其他來源的類似產品)時會產生的排放。由於CCS也是減少我們資產中伍德賽德？S範圍1排放的解決方案，因此我們有潛力在客户需求發展的同時支持我們自己使用的CCS項目的開發。我們相信CCS將在能源轉型中發揮越來越大的作用，伍德賽德也擁有競爭優勢，包括其在地球科學、地下工程和散裝天然氣處理方面的知識。碳信用組合我們的碳信用組合主要是為了解決伍德賽德？S範圍1和2的排放問題而開發的(見第28-31頁)也可以出售，以抵消客户的排放。我們目前正在探索向與我們的碳氫化合物產品捆綁在一起的客户提供碳信用的機會，例如來自斯卡伯勒的液化天然氣貨物。在過去，我們為相關的範圍1和2的排放提供貨物的碳信用。碳捕獲和利用從長遠來看，碳捕獲和利用(CCU，也稱為碳轉化產品)有可能大規模利用第三方來源的CO。2 2023年，伍德賽德與CCU技術開發商LanzaTech、NovoNutrients、StringBio和幾家工程公司一起完成了多項工程研究 。這些研究有助於瞭解如何整合和優化他們的技術，以將温室氣體轉化為各種有用的產品。 Woodside是莫納什大學RECARB ARC Hub的創始合作伙伴，該中心正在探索直接空氣捕獲CO用於產品。2 CCS在科學途徑中的作用？CO捕獲和地下注入是一項成熟的天然氣處理和提高石油採收率的技術2。與石油和天然氣部門相比，CCS在電力部門以及水泥和化學品生產方面不那麼成熟，在這些領域，CCS是一個關鍵的緩解選擇。技術地質CO存儲容量估計約為1,000~20億噸CO，高於將全球變暖控制在1.5攝氏度以內的CO存儲需求2到2100，儘管區域地質存儲的可用性可能是一個限制因素 。如果適當地選擇和管理地質儲存地點，估計可以將CO與大氣永久隔離2。CCS的實施目前面臨技術、經濟、體制、生態環境和社會文化障礙。目前，全球部署CCS的速度遠遠低於將全球變暖限制在1.5攝氏度或2攝氏度以內的模擬路徑。政策手段、更大的公共支持和技術創新等有利條件可以減少這些障礙。氣專委第六次評估報告1氣專委2022年。《2022年氣候變化：減緩氣候變化》。第三工作組對政府間氣候變化專門委員會第六次評估報告的貢獻？供決策者參考的摘要，第C.4.6段。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司38

Opportunity updates: CCS Angel CCS Bonaparte CCS South East Australia (SEA) CCS Proposed opportunity(1) OPERATED NON-OPERATED NON-OPERATED Description Proposed large-scale multi-user CCS hub with the Proposed multi-user CCS hub with the potential to help Proposed multi-phased CCS project with the potential potential to help Australian and international customers Australian and international customers decarbonise. to help Australian and international customers decarbonise. decarbonise. Location Offshore, North West Australia Offshore, Northern Australia Offshore, South East Australia Greenhouse Gas permits secured(2) 9 9 In progress (submitted Nov 2023, outcome pending) Facilities land access(3) In progress In progress In progress (Phase 1) Pre-front end engineering design (Pre-FEED) Concept definition commenced Nov 2023 Concept select commenced Aug 2023 9 (Phase 1) Front end engineering design (FEED) Phase 1 FEED commenced April 2023 Regulatory approvals(4) In progress In progress In progress Technical readiness to support FID(5) Commercial readiness to support FID(5) Potential scale(6) Foundation project: up to 5 Mtpa CO -e emissions Foundation project: up to 5 Mtpa CO -e emissions Foundation project: Phase 1 ~0.5 Mtpa CO -e emissions reduction. Potential to address Scope 1 and 3 emissions. reduction. Potential to address Scope 3 emissions. reduction (Scope 1 only). Phase 2 expansion, up to 1.5 Woodside equity 20%. Woodside equity Scope 3 Woodside equity 21%. Woodside equity Scope 3 Mtpa CO -e emissions (potential Scope 3). estimate is 0.6 Mtpa CO -e emissions reduction. estimate is 1.05 Mtpa CO -e emissions reduction. Woodside equity 50%. Woodside equity Scope 3 estimate is 0.75 Mtpa CO -e emissions reduction (Phase 2 only). This table provides information about proposed CCS opportunities currently in our portfolio. They are at different stages of maturity and may not all proceed to ?nal investment decisions. We are also working to develop additional opportunities not shown here. The purpose of this table is to demonstrate that we are pursuing multiple opportunities as part of our approach to managing the risks to achieving our Scope 3 targets. 1 Proposed opportunities are subject to commercial arrangements, commercial feasibility, regulatory and Joint Venture approvals, and third party activities (which may or may not proceed). Individual investment decisions are subject to Woodside?s investment targets. Not guidance. 2 Angel CCS GHG permit: G-10-AP. Bonaparte CCS permit: G-7-AP. SEA CCS permit application: GHG23-10. 3 Land access is the right to install surface infrastructure including transportation infrastructure. 4 Regulatory approvals are ?in progress? if the application documentation is being developed or has been submitted to the regulator for approval, but a final decision has not yet been made. 5 A project is considered FID-ready if it has completed and/or obtained the necessary studies, permits and designs so that a ?nal investment decision can be made. This decision is made based on a range of ?nancial, technical and strategic factors, and is a requirement for construction and implementation of a project to commence. 6 Project capacity subject to further engineering. Potential scale of Scope 1 and Scope 3 emissions is based on best technical estimate using engineering judgement by appropriately skilled and experienced engineers including potential allocation of capacity to meet Woodside Scope 1 emissions requirements. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 39

RISKS TO ACHIEVING THE SCOPE 3 INVESTMENT AND EMISSIONS ABATEMENT TARGETS Whilst demand for new energy products and lower carbon services is expected to grow signi?cantly during the energy transition, the timing and pace of such growth is not certain. Risks to achieving the targets include that technology and markets for these products and services are developing rapidly. Because of this, Woodside actively reviews its strategy and its portfolio of opportunities and they should be expected to evolve as a matter of normal practice. Woodside has targets for the economic viability of its product streams contained in its capital allocation framework. See page 49. Achieving these returns may depend on the development of government policy, such as grants and subsidies. Whilst indicated by the intent of high level government policy, these measures are not currently implemented to the extent required. Because markets for these products and services are relatively immature (compared to oil and gas markets), confidence in offtake may not be secured at the same pace as engineering maturity. This means that some projects might achieve technical ?FID-ready? status and then effectively be paused until such time as acceptable offtake is achieved.1 Woodside is actively seeking to address these risks including by pursuing multiple opportunities to achieve our targets. ADDRESSING THE RISK TO SECURING OFFTAKE Markets for lower carbon services and new energy products are still developing. We recognise that for a customer to switch to buying hydrogen or hydrogen derivatives such as ammonia, they need to make a signi?cant decision to convert their equipment (for example, a trucking ?eet), and for this they need to have con?dence in the price and reliability of supply. The same is true of the investment needed for a customer to commit to a CCS project at their business. To build this con?dence, Woodside has established a dedicated team targeting potential customers in the domestic heavy-duty transport, industrials and chemicals sectors, and the international export and marine fuels sectors. We are also communicating with potential customers with the objective of developing orderbooks in priority international markets of the United States, Europe (Germany and Netherlands) and Asia-Paci?c (Singapore, Korea and Japan). Business development teams in the United States, Europe and APAC coordinate and work alongside country offices and central marketing teams to further develop these relationships. Customer collaborations include:2 studies relating to the capture of CO by industry in the Chubu region of Japan and its transportation 2 and storage in Australia, with Sumitomo Corporation, Toho Gas Co Ltd and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd; studies relating to the capture of CO by industry in the Setouchi and Shikoku regions of Japan 2 and its transportation and storage in Australia, with Sumitomo Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co Ltd and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd; studies relating to the capture of CO by from power generation in the Kansai region of Japan 2 and its transportation and storage in Australia, with Kansai Electric Power Co.; evaluating the potential of the supply of liquid hydrogen to Keppel Data Centres? data centre facilities, including its planned Datapark+, which is envisioned to be an energy-efficient data centre park development in Singapore; opportunities relating to long term hydrogen and ammonia offtake arrangements and participation in production projects, with South Korea?s SK E&S Co Ltd. Woodside has also entered into non-binding agreements to collaborate individually with Sumitomo Corporation and Sojitz Corporation on global opportunities in new energy which could include ammonia, hydrogen, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon management technology. These are part of a strategic relationship with LNG Japan, a 50:50 joint venture between Sumitomo Corporation and Sojtiz Corporation. The strategic relationship also includes equity in the Scarborough Joint Venture and potential LNG offtake. Woodside and JERA have also entered into a non-binding agreement for new energy collaboration including potential opportunities in ammonia, hydrogen, carbon management technology and carbon capture and storage to support common decarbonisation ambitions.3 1 A project is considered FID-ready if it has completed and/or obtained the necessary studies, permits and designs so that a ?nal investment decision can be made. This decision is made based on a range of ?nancial, technical and strategic factors, and is a requirement for construction and implementation of a project to commence. 2 Customer collaborations are non-binding. 3 See announcement titled ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 40

3.7 Supporting our value chain In addition to our plans to invest in new energy products and lower carbon services, Woodside plans to support our customers and suppliers to help them reduce emissions; and promote global measurement and reporting. SUPPORTING CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS Woodside has been implementing climate-related requirements into new tenders and contracts throughout 2023, which includes evaluating tenders based on climate criteria and reporting carbon emissions during contract execution. To support our suppliers, we have been engaging them via existing forums and also encouraging them to bring forward emissions reduction opportunities. We joined the ASEAN Methane Leadership Programme in 2023 and initiated an Australian methane programme through the Australian Climate Leaders Coalition. These programmes allow Woodside to share expertise with other companies in the natural gas value chain to help them reduce emissions of methane to near-zero.1 Any such reductions at facilities using natural gas purchased from Woodside could be a reduction in our Scope 3 emissions. We extended our membership of the Qantas Sustainable Aviation Fuels Coalition (SAF Coalition) which we joined in 2022. The SAF Coalition supports the purchase by Qantas of SAF, reducing Qantas Scope 1 emissions and also business air travel Scope 3 emissions by around 0.9 kt CO -e for each member. 2 We joined The Silk Alliance in 2024. Silk Alliance is a concept of a Green Corridor Cluster where the technological, economic, and regulatory feasibility of zero emissions shipping is observed on a ?cluster? of ships operating within a specific catchment region, extending to the Indian and Pacific Ocean region. In 2023, Woodside, HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering (HD KSOE), and Hyundai Glovis achieved a key milestone with the completion of a detailed study into the design of a large-scale, purpose-built liquid hydrogen carrier. The study focused on re?ning the ?exible ship design to achieve improvements in safety, constructability, and cost-effectiveness.?In 2024, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, one of the world?s largest global shipping companies is welcomed to the collaboration to work on delivering an integrated marine transportation system for liquid hydrogen. PROMOTING GLOBAL MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING The ability to address Scope 3 emissions would be enhanced by consistent global reporting systems that enable common calculation methodologies and the tracking of emissions between companies and across national boundaries. We participated in the Ipieca Scope 3 Emissions Taskforce which provides members the opportunity to convene and disseminate knowledge and good practice in the area of Scope 3 emissions, including categorisation, value chain emission analysis, Scope 3 measurement (incl. technology requirements) and reporting and engagement along the value chain. We reviewed and supported the creation of the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP), Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI) and Ipieca joint report on ?Recommended practices for methane emissions detection and quantification technologies? as a committee member of the Ipieca methane taskforce. 1 OGMP, 2023. ?Implementation Plan Guidance?, p. 2 https://ogmpartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OGMP-2.0-Implementation-Plan-Guidance_2.pdf. OGMP provides the OGCI collective average target for upstream operations as an example of ?near zero? emissions intensity. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 41

4.0資本分配當用於發電 天然氣通常產生煤炭排放量的一半。

4.1資本調整我們的資本調整方法 解釋了我們如何考慮新材料投資的氣候相關風險和機遇，包括分析其與1.5C路徑的一致性。化石燃料用於能源的使用約佔人為 温室氣體排放總量的四分之三。1這意味着實現氣候變化目標的努力必須包括改變世界生產和消費能源的方式。這些變化被稱為？能源轉型？能量轉換的確切形式和速度是不確定的。預計各國將有所不同，因為各國有不同的起點、發展要求、資源和能力。然而，過渡的規模更明確，因為它將需要數十年的投資數十億美元。國際可再生能源機構（IRENA）估計，到2050年，它將需要150萬億美元的累計投資。2雖然能源轉型所需的投資規模為Woodside創造了機會，但其固有的不確定性和潛在的波動性也會帶來風險。我們認為，承認不確定性並建立對不確定性的適應能力，比選擇一個單一的未來情景並採取行動， 是更好的應對措施。這一方針要求我們：仔細分析廣泛的能源市場和氣候相關方案，使我們的投資組合多樣化以滿足不斷變化的客户需求，建立一個嚴格的資本分配框架，將我們的 投資集中在我們認為最具競爭力的地方，與客户通力合作以瞭解並滿足他們的需求，從而最終確保他們購買我們的產品和服務。1國際能源機構，2021年。？到2050年實現淨零： 全球能源部門的路線圖？pp. 13. All rights reserved. 2 IRENA，2023年。？2023年世界能源轉型展望：1.5C路徑？國際可再生能源機構，阿布扎比。第25頁。伍德賽德？氣候變遷行動計劃和2023年進展報告 Woodside Energy Group Ltd 43

4.2全球對石油和天然氣的需求伍德賽德？S 要想在能源轉型中蓬勃發展，首先要認識到未來發展的不確定性，並在我們的投資組合中建立韌性。我們認為，這比選擇一個單一的未來情景並表現得好像它是確定的 更好。全球石油和天然氣使用根據聯合國-S政府間氣候變化專門委員會(政府間氣候變化專門委員會)，有多種可行和有效的選擇來減少温室氣體排放和適應人類造成的氣候變化。1 2023年，政府間氣候變化專門委員會結束了其第六次評估報告。2它發現，有許多途徑可以將變暖限制在《巴黎協定》的目標範圍內。這些路徑包括97條可以在沒有或 有限超調的情況下將變暖限制在1.5攝氏度的路徑(建模的全球排放路徑分類為C1，這是IPCC評估的最雄心勃勃的子集)。3報告還包括在高超調後將變暖返回1.5攝氏度的可能性為50%或更高的路徑(C2)、將變暖限制在2攝氏度或更高的可能性(C3)或更高的路徑，以及最高超過4攝氏度的其他更高温度結果(C8)。在本世紀餘下的時間裏，所有這些途徑對石油和天然氣的需求都將保持，但程度不同。不同的變量對這些途徑的温度結果有影響。例如，天然氣使用量較高的C1路徑通常也有較高的CCU使用量。4每個特定温度結果路徑的石油和天然氣使用量範圍之所以出現，是因為一個部門的選擇可以通過在另一個部門的選擇來補償，同時與全球變暖的相同評估水平保持一致。4全球石油和天然氣使用量是温度結果的一個重要但不是唯一的決定因素。其他不利因素包括煤炭使用量、一次能源總使用量、能源部門以外的排放量以及減排和二氧化碳清除量。此外，預計不同的國家將按照《巴黎協定》所稱的公平和共同但有區別的責任和各自能力的原則，根據不同的國情，尋求不同的選擇。5根據COP28全球氣候首腦會議的科學，世界各國政府同意在能源系統中以公正、有序和公平的方式放棄化石燃料，在這個關鍵的十年加快行動，為了在2050年實現淨零，以符合科學。6在本節中，我們將探討轉型對石油和天然氣需求的影響。關於締約方會議第二十八屆會議議事程序的進一步信息見第65頁。圖表(下一頁)分別列出了氣專委S C1和C1C3類別中天然氣和石油的使用範圍。7圖表還分別顯示了在沒有任何進一步投資的情況下以及在投資僅限於現有和批准的項目的情況下，國際能源署分別提供天然氣和石油供應的情況。圖表顯示，雖然IPCC C1類別中有一些途徑的石油和天然氣使用量與那些不需要額外投資的途徑一致，但還有一些石油和天然氣使用量較高的途徑出現這種温度結果的可能性相同。1政府間氣候變化專門委員會，2023。？緊急氣候行動可以確保所有人都有一個宜居的未來？， https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/press/IPCC_AR6_SYR_4 IPCC2022。《2022年氣候變化：減緩氣候變化》。第三工作組對新聞機構第六次評估報告的貢獻政府間氣候變化專門委員會？供決策者參考的摘要，第C.3.2段。2政府間氣候變化專門委員會，2023。《2023年氣候變化：綜合報告》。第一、第二和第三工作組對2015年第五次《氣候公約》第六次評估報告的貢獻。？《巴黎協定》，Preamble. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.政府間氣候變化專門委員會？，[核心寫作團隊，H.Lee和J.Romero(編輯)]。氣專委，日內瓦，瑞士，DOI：10.59327/6《氣候公約》，2023年。？首次全球評估的結果 ？(未編輯的高級版本)。Https://unfccc.int/documents/636584，第二節，氣專委/AR6-9789291691647，https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVolume.pdf—referred至隨後的小節A，第28條。(D)本頁腳註為氣專委，2023年。？AR6-Syr？政府間氣候變化專門委員會，2022年。？ar6-wg3？第78頁。10.1017/9781009157926.002。有關完整參考，請參閲詞彙表。3超調意味着暫時超過特定的全球變暖水平，如1.5攝氏度。 超調意味着一個峯值，隨後是2023年的第8個IEA。？石油和天然氣行業的淨零過渡？，全球變暖的https://www.iea.org/reports/the-oil-and-gas-industry-in-net-zero-transitions，下降，通過人為清除CO？是否超過剩餘CO？全球排放量。許可：CC至4.0。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司44

Potential global use of gas in pathways that limit warming1,2,3 Potential global use of oil in pathways that limit warming1,2,3 USE OF SCENARIOS There are many different scenarios and methodologies for producing them. Typically they are not forecasts, but they can provide a view of different potential futures ? if used in the right application with an awareness of their underlying approach, assumptions, limitations and inputs. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report In its Sixth Assessment Report, the IPCC assessed a wide range of modelled global emission pathways and scenarios from the literature.4 The IPCC?s approach enables consideration of the potential range for global use of oil and gas in pathways that could limit warming to a number of given temperature outcomes, including 1.5C. The IPCC?s reports are also used to inform the development of global and national policies, for example at the recent COP28 climate summit in the UAE. IEA scenarios Woodside also utilises IEA scenarios, for example in the financial analysis on pages 52-53 of this report. This is because (unlike the IPCC?s reports) they assess the supply of energy as well as the demand for it, and therefore are able to publish price assumptions which are required for financial analysis. The three IEA scenarios from the World Energy Outlook are not forecasts and they are one pathway to each of three distinct temperature assessments. However, they cover a wide range of potential global temperature outcomes, which makes them appropriate for scenario analysis that is intended to test resilience. In addition to the three scenarios in its World Energy Outlook, the IEA also provides cases which show the potential future supply of oil and gas, both with investment in existing and approved projects and without. These cases attempt to show the impact of companies investing in their current sources of supply and the potential need to invest in supplies in order to replenish those that are depleted. These cases have been used alongside IPCC temperature pathways in the charts (left). Woodside considers the IPCC and IEA approaches to be suitable for these purposes because they are independent global sources which publish information about their scenarios so that users can independently assess their assumptions and application. Woodside does not assign likelihood or probability to the eventuation of these scenarios, ranges or part thereof. Woodside planning assumptions By contrast, the assumptions used for Woodside?s internal business planning, such as for investment decisions and asset valuation, require a broader range of inputs. These inputs include consideration of climate-related factors, including both Paris-aligned and non Paris-aligned outcomes. They must also include other factors such as economic growth, inflation, exchange rates, interest rates and geopolitics. They consider the specific role of LNG (as opposed to aggregate gas use) and regional differentiations (as opposed to globalised data). Together these factors can inform a broad based consideration of risks, opportunities, competitiveness and resilience. They contribute to understanding the potential impact of climate-related risks alongside other risks on our strategy, business and financial planning. 1 Charts utilise IPCC ranges for oil and gas usage in scenarios that have a 50% or greater probability of limiting warming to 1.5C with no or limited overshoot (C1), a 50% or greater probability of returning warming to 1.5C after a high overshoot (C2), a 67% or greater probability of limiting warming to 2C (C3) from AR6-WG3. IPCC data representing outlooks for Primary Energy Oil and Primary Energy Gas was sourced from AR6 Scenarios Database, see full citation in Glossary. 2 IEA, 2023. ?The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions?, https://www.iea.org/reports/the-oil-and-gas-industry-in-net-zero-transitions, License: CC BY 4.0. 3 Data points sourced from the IPCC includes 2010, 2020, 2030, 2040 and 2050. Historical data from the IEA is provided on an annualised basis. Forward looking data from the IEA includes 2030, 2040, 2050. Woodside has used interpolation of the IEA and IPCC data points in intervening years. This is a work derived by Woodside Energy Ltd from IEA material and Woodside Energy Ltd is solely liable and responsible for this derived work. The derived work is not endorsed by the IEA in any manner. IEA data was converted to exajoules using conversion factors obtained from the IEA report; The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions, IEA 2023. IEA and IPCC scenarios are not predictions or forecasts and are representative of views of the future. Woodside?s approach to analysing and assessing future energy market conditions is based on qualitative and quantitative factors and may vary from any one scenario presented by the IEA or IPCC. 4 IPCC, 2023. ?Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change? [核心寫作團隊，H。Lee and J. Romero（eds.）]. IPCC，Geneva，Switzerland，doi：10.59327/IPCC/AR6—9789291691647，https：//www.ipcc.ch/ report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVol. pdf在本頁後續腳註中被稱為IPCC，2023。—？AR6—SYR？伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 45

4.3 The evolving role of natural gas Natural gas is a versatile energy source that plays a signi?cant role in various industries. Current uses of gas include power generation, heating, and chemical feedstock. According to a global gas demand analysis in 2022, the power sector accounted for 34% of global demand, while the industrial sector accounted for 27%. Residential use accounted for 15%.1 Electricity generation fuelled with natural gas typically releases about half the lifecycle amount of greenhouse gases compared to electricity generation fuelled with coal.3 Additionally, natural gas-?red electricity generation offers a ?exible means of providing support to batteries and help stabilise the power grid during periods of decreased renewable energy production (e.g. at night, and when the wind is calm). Industrial uses of gas centre around its role as: A feedstock for ammonia and methanol production, which are used for fertilizer and consumer goods manufacturing, among other processes that fuel economic growth and an increasing population. A source of hydrogen production for the re?ning and chemical industries. A source of heat for high-temperature industrial processes, such as producing aluminium, ceramics, cement, glass, and steel. Due to its high energy density and controllable combustion characteristics, gas is particularly suitable for generating high temperature heat which may not be achievable through direct electri?cation.2 Woodside expects that natural gas will continue to have such a transitional role, sustaining demand for the period which is relevant to our current portfolio of producing assets and sanctioned projects as well as for further growth opportunities. The use of gas in power grids that are decarbonising Australia?s National Electricity Market serves as an example of how a gas-renewables mix can generate power at lower emissions intensity than a coal-dominated mix. Power generation in South Australia is mainly from renewables with nearly one third from gas, and has only a third of the emissions intensity of power generation in Victoria, which relies mainly on brown coal. Emissions intensities and fuel mixes in the national electricity market4,5 1 International Gas Union, 2023. ?Global Gas Report 2023?, p. 22. https://www.igu.org/resources/global-gas-report-2023-edition/ 2 International Gas Union, 2023. ?Global Gas Report 2023?, pp. 76-77. https://www.igu.org/resources/global-gas-report-2023-edition/ 3 IEA, 2019. ?The Role of Gas in Today?s Energy Transition?, p. 4. All rights reserved. 4 Australian Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, 2023. ?Australian National Greenhouse Accounts Factors.? Electricity generation emissions intensities have been sourced from the emission factors in Table 1, pp. 7-8. These factors represent the emissions from the consumption of electricity purchased from a grid. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/ files/documents/national-greenhouse-account-factors-2023.pdf 5 Fuel mix percentages accessed online https://www.aemo.com.au/energy-systems/electricity/national-electricity-market-nem/data-nem/data-dashboard-nem using 12 months to 22 Jan 2023. WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 46 WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT

區域重點？液化天然氣在伍德賽德亞洲一號？ 我們的競爭優勢在於我們的液化天然氣業務靠近亞洲。亞洲是一個突出的製造業和貿易地區，已經使用液化天然氣，但也嚴重依賴煤炭發電，為進一步轉向天然氣以支持脱碳創造了機會。圖表（右上）顯示，亞洲地區（包括中國、東北亞和東南亞）已經是全球液化天然氣的主要買家。即使在俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭後天然氣供應中斷導致歐洲液化天然氣使用量增加之後，情況依然如此。圖表（右下角）強調了LNG合同繼續簽署的期限很長？過去三年簽訂的合同中，約有一半的合同期限為20年或以上。這意味着買方和賣方對LNG長期需求的信心？LNG Japan於2023年收購10%股權以及JERA於2024年收購Scarborough合資企業15.1%股權。1 Woodside並不認為這一需求是理所當然的，並認識到，為了將總需求轉化為我們生產的已實現銷售額，我們需要仔細評估投資機會的競爭力，並 與客户密切合作，瞭解並支持他們的需求。我們對這項工作的方法將在下面幾頁中描述。按目的地分列的全球液化天然氣合同2按期限分列的全球液化天然氣合同2 1見標題為？伍德賽德將出售10% 斯卡伯勒股權給液化天然氣日本？（2023年8月8日）和？伍德賽德將15.1%的斯卡伯勒股權出售給JERA？(23 2024年2月）在woodside.com。温室氣體排放數據，包括本氣候變化 過渡行動計劃中未來減排計劃的圖表和估計數，尚未更新以反映伍德賽德的變化？由於出售15.1%權益予JERA，其於士嘉堡合資企業的股權份額。[2] Wood Mackenzie，2023年。？液化天然氣合同的發展趨勢？數據集包括 許多生產商的全球合同，包括Woodside。只包括買賣協議。僅限最終用户合同。世界其他地區是指南美洲、中東和非洲以及北美洲。伍德賽德？氣候變遷行動 2023年進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 47

4.4 Managing uncertainty through diversi?cation Woodside?s strategy is to diversify and adapt, rather than choosing a single course in advance and acting as if the energy transition were more certain than it is. Woodside is working to diversify its portfolio by adding new products and services alongside our existing products, where we believe we have a competitive advantage to supply them successfully through the energy transition. They each bring different qualities to the portfolio. Natural gas Asia has more than half of the world?s people and is growing.1 Across Asia many countries are still heavily reliant on coal which accounts for approximately 50% of total energy supply in the Asia Paci?c.2 Woodside?s LNG is located close to demand centres which enables lower shipping emissions.3 LNG typically offers longer-term cash flows and lower Scope 3 intensity (but higher Scope 1 intensity) than the oil projects in Woodside?s portfolio. Oil Oil demand is expected to decline as its use in light passenger transport is substituted by vehicle electri?cation.4 Demand in petrochemicals and heavy transport is likely to be resilient for longer. The range of oil use in 2050 in the IPCC?s C1 to C3 (1.5C to 2C) range is 15 to more than 230 EJ per year.5 In 2022 oil consumption was 168 EJ.4 Oil projects tend to provide higher cash and higher returns, lower Scope 1 and 2 emissions (though higher Scope 3) and shorter term paybacks than the LNG projects in Woodside?s portfolio. The global oil market is commoditised and as a result changes in demand are likely to be reflected in oil prices. This, in turn, affects investment in supply, which should moderate accordingly. The case for continued exploration Further green?eld exploration for oil and gas resources has the potential to highgrade our portfolio and improve our ability to thrive through the energy transition. New resources that are more competitive ? for example, lower cost, lower carbon, or closer to infrastructure ? than other existing global discovered resources are more likely to attract investment to meet the available demand for oil and gas. This is not new in the oil and gas industry. Within the Woodside portfolio, the Pluto gas ?eld was not discovered until 2006 but has been developed ahead of resources that had already been discovered at that time, in some cases for decades. CCS CCS is a mature technology which represents a proven solution to abate large-scale industrial emissions. Globally, CCS has been successfully used for decades, in particular in support of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) but is now being utilised for permanent emissions storage.6 The skills and capabilities required to store carbon dioxide in geological formations are similar to those needed to ?nd and produce oil and gas. New energy New fuel types such as hydrogen and ammonia have the potential to decarbonise hard to abate sectors which are difficult to electrify (such as in heavy transport, chemical feedstocks, or in steel and alumina). They also have the potential to ?rm renewables as a substitute to natural gas where batteries lack scale and longevity. Transporting and containing these fuels in bulk requires similar expertise to that which Woodside already applies in the LNG industry. 1 United Nations, 2022. ?World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results?, Table 1.1, https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf. 2 IEA, 2020. ?Asia Pacific: Region profile, Total energy supply 2020?, https://www.iea.org/regions/asia-pacific. 3 Shorter journeys are associated with lower shipping related emissions. 4 IEA 2023. ?World Energy Outlook 2023.? All rights reserved. 5 AR6 Scenarios Database hosted by IIASA, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2022. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5886911, https://www.data.ece.iiasa.ac.at/ar6/. 6 IPCC, 2022. ?Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change? Summary for Policymakers paragraph C.4.6. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 48

Capital Allocation Framework We expect all of these products and services to be in strong demand in the decades ahead. However, we can only supply them pro?tably where we have customers who want to buy them and ?nd them affordable. Whilst oil and gas markets are strong today, demand for new energy and CCS is still emerging. Therefore, we need to invest with discipline, testing our opportunities against our capital allocation framework. Woodside?s disciplined capital allocation approach includes robust assessment of opportunities, portfolio outcomes and shareholder returns while maintaining focus on safe, reliable and efficient operations. Our capital allocation framework sets target investment criteria for oil, gas and new energy opportunities. We use this capital allocation framework to create a diversi?ed and ?exible portfolio, which allows us to respond to changes in demand and supply for our products. For example, they are informed by energy market analysis including supply, demand and price outlooks. We test the robustness of potential investments against a range of scenarios to support our investment decisions with the goal of remaining profitable and resilient through various commodity cycles and climate outcomes. The assessment of an investment?s resilience to the energy transition is described on the following two pages. Capital Allocation Framework OIL GAS NEW ENERGY OFFSHORE PIPELINE LNG DIVERSIFIED Generate high returns to fund Leveraging infrastructure to New energy products and lower Focus diversi?ed growth, focusing monetise undeveloped gas, carbon services to reduce customers? on high quality resources including optionality for hydrogen emissions; hydrogen, ammonia, CCUS1 Stable long-term Long-term cash ?ow High cash generation Developing market cash ?ow pro?le Strong forecast Characteristics Shorter payback period Lower capital requirement Quick to market Resilient to commodity demand Lower risk pro?le pricing Upside potential Opportunity IRR > 15% IRR > 12% IRR > 10% targets Payback within 5 years2 Payback within 7 years2 Payback within 10 years2 Emissions Net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions: reduction target 30% reduction by 2030; aspiration for net zero by 2050 or sooner3 When assessing opportunities, we consider a broad range of portfolio evaluation and opportunity evaluation factors relevant to the opportunity. These assessments can apply to acquisitions or divestments, and for evaluating the impact of a new project on the portfolio. Portfolio evaluation considerations4 Opportunity evaluation considerations4 Earnings Free cash Funding Emissions Strategic Payback IRR/NPV Risk Breakeven per share ?ow capacity pro?le ?t period Growth opportunities are screened against portfolio metrics using price, scenario and climate analysis 1 CCUS refers to carbon capture utilisation and storage. 2 Payback refers to RFSU + X years. 3 Targets and aspiration are for net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions relative to a starting base of 6.32 Mt CO -e which is representative of the gross annual average 2 equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions over 2016-2020 and which may be adjusted (up or down) for potential equity changes in producing or sanctioned assets with a ?nal investment decision prior to 2021. Net equity emissions include the utilisation of carbon credits as offsets. 4 Illustrative of the considerations. Not an exhaustive list. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD

4.5評估投資決策的轉型適應性 隨着能源轉型的需求發生變化，Woodside將在做出投資決策之前仔細評估新項目的競爭力。我們開發了一個？過渡案件？方法論，就像商業案例和安全案例，幫助我們通過評估一系列氣候相關因素的投資機會來管理風險。目前，我們的過渡案例方法有六個要素，這些要素首次應用於2023年墨西哥灣墨西哥段Trion開發項目的最終投資決策。我們不希望一個單獨的項目可以根據一個單獨的項目來判斷？通過還是失敗？測試這些屬性。事實上，他們中的一些人可能持反對意見：石油 項目的範圍1排放量可能比天然氣項目低，但範圍3排放量更高，反之亦然。重要的是，在作出投資決定後，伍德賽德投資組合的整體彈性是否仍在我們的風險承受能力之內。此過渡個案方法將繼續發展，並追溯應用於士嘉堡發展項目，供參考之用，詳情載於第51頁表格。石油和天然氣投資的過渡案例。我們認為：1。 投資吸引力利用一系列經濟假設，並根據氣候情景以及地緣政治和宏觀經濟等其他因素進行分析。2.現金？通過比較影響來分析情景影響？有沒有 機會？未來的現金？使用場景，包括1.5C的情況。3.考慮到項目競爭力的潛在需求彈性分析？在氣專委設想方案中，包括1.5C情況下，相對於需求範圍的供應成本。 4.通過比較影響來分析與氣候有關的風險和機遇？有沒有機會我們的投資組合總氣候風險暴露。5.範圍1和2組合排放評估影響？設計出？項目排放量、 和剩餘排放量對組合排放量減少需求和組合排放強度的影響。6.範圍1、2和3的組合排放強度通過比較的影響？有沒有機會在我們的投資組合上。伍德賽德？S氣候 過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司50

Trion石油開發和Scarborough天然氣 開發為了説明過渡案例方法在評估投資決策對能源轉型的適應性方面的應用，本表總結了在其？最終 投資決策我們亦已將該方法追溯應用於Scarborough項目。過渡案例Trion（在FID）Scarborough Project（回顧性）1.投資吸引力預期> 16%的IRR， 13.5%的內部回報率和約6年的投資回收期，超過框架目標1資本分配框架目標7預計全部盈虧平衡 payback>

4.6 Scenario analysis of Woodside?s portfolio Woodside?s current portfolio is financially robust to a range of climate-related scenarios.1 Summary of insights Woodside uses a range of climate scenarios to test the ?nancial resilience of our portfolio of producing assets and sanctioned projects. The analysis described here concludes that: The Woodside portfolio is free cash ?ow (FCF) positive for all relevant periods showing the resilience of the business including in the NZE scenario and the IEA Announced Pledges Scenario (APS) that are aligned with the Paris Agreement temperature goals. FCF from 2024-2027 is lower than 2028-2032 (under all three scenarios) due to high capital expenditure during this period for Scarborough, Pluto Train 2 and the Trion development. FCF peaks under all three scenarios in 2028-2032 as Scarborough and Trion are operating, and then declines consistent with the natural ?eld decline of older assets within our portfolio and because the analysis assumes no new green?eld oil and gas investments by Woodside. Oil and gas prices are the key value drivers and have a greater impact on FCF through to 2040 than carbon pricing. Scenario analysis methodology In the analysis in this section, we use three scenarios from the IEA?s 2023 World Energy Outlook (WEO) because they are publicly available and widely understood.1 They cover a broad range of temperature outcomes, including a 1.5C outcome as well as above 2C outcomes. More information about different types of scenarios and how we use them is provided on page 45. We use annual average FCF generation as the assessed metric because it is a measure of our ability to fund future capital investment and shareholder returns and is unaffected by accounting treatment. Our analysis uses the most recent pricing assumptions from the IEA (in their World Energy Outlook 2023), and has included the Trion oil development in Mexico for the ?rst time, following its ?nal investment decision during the year.2,3 The analysis applies a price on carbon for all emissions that exceed the pro?le created by our regulatory obligations, our net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets of 15% by 2025 and 30% by 2030, and our aspiration for net zero equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner.4 The analysis is relatively insensitive to the carbon price impact upon Woodside?s Scope 1 and 2 emissions. The impact of carbon pricing upon Scope 3 emissions is accounted for in the demand (and therefore commodity price calculated) in each scenario by the IEA World Energy Model.5 This commodity price impact is the cause of 95% of the variation between the scenarios. We will continue to review the best form of scenario analysis to meet the requirements of climate-related disclosure standards. 1 See announcement titled ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. Greenhouse gas emissions data including charts and estimates of future abatement plans in this Climate Action Transition Plan have not been updated to reflect changes in Woodside?s equity share of the Scarborough Joint Venture as a consequence of the sale of 15.1% interest to JERA. 2 IEA, 2023. ?World Energy Outlook 2023.? All rights reserved. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/42b23c45-78bc-4482-b0f9-eb826ae2da3d/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf 3 Modelled based on current equity assumptions within portfolio: Scarborough 90%, Pluto Train 2 51%, Trion 60%. 4 Targets and aspiration are for net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions relative to a starting base of 6.32 Mt CO -e which is representative of the gross annual average equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions over 2016-2020 and which may be adjusted (up or down) for potential 2 equity changes in producing or sanctioned assets with a ?nal investment decision prior to 2021. Net equity emissions include the utilisation of carbon credits as offsets. 5 IEA, 2023. ?World Energy Model Documentation?. All rights reserved. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ff3a195d-762d-4284-8bb5-bd062d260cc5/GlobalEnergyandClimateModelDocumentation2023.pdf WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 52

投資組合彈性：針對氣候進行了測試 SCENARIOS1油價(美元/桶，布倫特)2，北亞液化天然氣價格(美元/MMBtu)2和碳價格(美元/TCO？-e)3 2022年國際能源署NZE 52 8 101 41 5 139 34 5 169 31 5 195國際能源署APS 76 10 100 74 8 133 72 7 153 69 7 169國際能源署第84 11 80 85 9 84 9 80 84 8 80*2019-2023年平均實際2022年布倫特原油價格為74美元/桶。《國際能源署-S經濟展望》探討了三種主要情景。4這些情景不是預測。國際能源署對能源系統的未來並沒有單一的看法。伍德賽德不會為這些情況中的任何一種指定最終發生的可能性或概率。情景總結如下：到2050年淨零排放(NZE)情景描繪了一條狹窄但可實現的道路，全球能源部門通過部署廣泛的清潔能源技術組合，在不抵消土地利用措施的情況下，到2050年實現與能源相關的淨零排放。這與將全球氣温上升限制在1.5攝氏度以內(至少有50%的可能性) 並限制超調是一致的。已宣佈的承諾情景(APS)假定各國政府將按時足額兑現其作出的氣候承諾，包括國家自主貢獻和較長期的淨零排放目標 。在這種情況下，2100年的温度上升是1.7攝氏度(有50%的可能性)。所述政策情景(步驟)旨在根據對當前政策格局的詳細審查，提供對能源系統發展的主流方向的認識。這種情況與2100年氣温上升2.4攝氏度有關(概率為50%)。有關伍德賽德？S為不同目的使用場景的更多信息，請參見第4.2節。1模擬了氣候情景對當前生產和受制裁資產的潛在平均年自由現金流的影響(不是指導)。參見Woodside將15.1%的Scarborough權益出售給jera？(2024年2月23日)的公告。温室氣體排放數據，包括本氣候行動過渡計劃中對未來減排計劃的圖表和估計，尚未更新，以反映由於向JERA出售 15.1%權益而導致的伍德賽德？S在斯卡伯勒合資企業中的股權份額的變化。2基於2023年國際能源署的數據。？《2023年世界能源展望》通過伍德賽德分析進行了修正。伍德賽德使用插值法估計了國際能源署披露價格的年份之間布倫特原油的年度價格點。對於天然氣定價假設，所有非合同液化天然氣產量都以國際能源署S日本進口價格進行評估，作為北亞液化天然氣現貨價格的替代。伍德賽德使用插值法估計了國際能源署披露價格的年份之間的年度天然氣價格點。對於與石油掛鈎的液化天然氣合約，價格是根據布倫特原油的預測和合約條款得出的。3基於2023年國際能源署的數據。？《2023年世界能源展望》通過伍德賽德分析進行了修正。國際能源署只提供從2030年起的碳價格。因此，伍德賽德使用了與內部碳定價一致的80美元/噸CO？-E的起始價。伍德賽德使用2022年的起始價，國際能源署S發佈了每個情景的2030年和2040年的碳價格 插入到2040年的年度價格點。國際能源署，2023年。？《2023年世界能源展望》。版權所有。Https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/42b23c45-78bc-4482-b0f9-eb826ae2da3d/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司53

4.7 Customer relationships The existence of strong demand for our products and the disciplined approach we take to capital allocation and climate-screening are pre-requisites to converting demand into sales. We also foster strong customer relationships based on reliable competitive supply. PROJECT COMPETITIVENESS Woodside?s existing portfolio of assets has key strengths in the competition to supply our traditional markets. These include: Location The proximity of Woodside?s Australian LNG operations to Asia is a competitive advantage for our business. We have four large LNG customer markets on our doorstep. Japan and South Korea are approximately 25% reliant on coal for their energy needs today.1 China and India?s reliance on coal is significantly higher at 61% and 43% respectively.1 Closer to home, in Australia the National Electricity Market fuel mix in 2023 was 63% coal, and just 5% gas.2 This indicates growth potential for gas as the National Electricity Market (NEM) transitions from coal towards an 82% renewables target (from today?s 23%) and expands in size to meet emerging demand from vehicle electrification.2 Scale and ?exibility Woodside has a diverse and ?exible marketing portfolio of supply and delivery points across both the Asia Paci?c and Atlantic basins. We are actively looking for opportunities to grow our global supply portfolio and to build scale through cost competitive equity and third-party LNG. Shipping Our sales strategy is underpinned by ex-ship sales and strong, logistical capability. Woodside is advantaged through our long shipping position, which enables Woodside to create upside value through short-term trading and portfolio optimisation activities. Lower carbon Woodside continues to monitor the market on its appetite to pay a premium for lower carbon production. For example, regulatory frameworks such as the European Union?s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism maybe an indication that policy will increasingly reward lower carbon production in the future. The CLEAN (Coalition for LNG Emission Abatement toward Net Zero) initiative announced by the United States of America, the Republic of Korea, Australia, the European Commission, and Japan at the LNG Producer-Consumer Conference 2023 is another example.3 CONTRACTING STRATEGY We have taken the approach of layering contracts throughout market cycles to enable a balanced approach to revenue certainty with the opportunity for upside pricing, making strategic choices about the proportion of contracts to enter into relative to spot sales, and which benchmarks to link pricing to. Woodside?s revenue is predominantly exposed to the oil price, with the remainder being fixed price or other low-volatility constructs, all linked to gas hub prices such as JKM or TTF. The strategic capability that has been established through decades of experience as a LNG marketer is the same capability that can navigate demand fluctuation in the energy transition. The sale of 10% of the Scarborough Joint Venture to LNG Japan and of 15.1% to JERA was a clear expression of confidence in the importance of that project to Japan?s energy security and decarbonisation goals.4 MARKETING In addition to the intrinsic competitiveness of our products and our approach to contracting, Woodside maintains active representation in key markets in order to maintain relationships with buyers that are rooted in decades of trust, and a deep understanding of their needs. In 2023, Woodside?s climate and sustainability executives conducted a specific climate-related engagement roadshow to discuss the energy transition with sustainability executives in Tokyo and Osaka. 1 IEA, 2020. ?IEA World Energy Balances?, https://www.iea.org/regions/asia-pacific. 2 Fuel mix percentages accessed online https://www.aemo.com.au/energy-systems/electricity/national-electricity-market-nem/data-nem/data-dashboard-nem on using 12 months to 22 Jan 2023. 3 https://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/news/release/news_10_00041.html 4 See announcements titled ?Woodside to sell 10% Scarborough interest to LNG Japan? (8 August 2023) and ?Woodside to sell 15.1% Scarborough interest to JERA? (23 February 2024) at woodside.com. Greenhouse gas emissions data including charts and estimates of future abatement plans in this Climate Transition Action Plan have not been updated to reflect changes in Woodside?s equity share of the Scarborough Joint Venture as a consequence of the sale of 15.1% interest to JERA. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 54

來自市場的證據伍德賽德監測政策、監管和市場發展，為未來對其產品的需求提供路標。20231 10月8日澳日部長級經濟對話聯合部長聲明-部長們認識到，澳大利亞和日本的S特別戰略夥伴關係比以往任何時候都更加強大和重要，其基礎是共同的價值觀、深度的經濟互補性和持久的民間聯繫。澳大利亞承諾從現在到未來繼續成為日本和該地區可靠的資源和能源供應國。這適用於煤炭和液化天然氣(LNG)等傳統能源大宗商品，以及新能源供應氫氣和氨氣，因為各國正在實現經濟脱碳，以實現淨零排放和《巴黎協定》承諾。部長們同意確保穩定的能源供應，並在相互信任的基礎上在過渡期提供投資確定性。部長們認識到遵循各種能源過渡路徑的重要性，同時實現經濟增長，確保能源安全，並解決脱碳問題。他們指出了液化天然氣以及可再生能源和儲能技術在能源轉型中的重要性。部長們認識到了澳大利亞？S和日本？S能源關係對兩國的重要性？經濟、安全和脱碳議程。液化天然氣日本？S收購澳大利亞斯卡伯勒合資企業10%的權益2伍德賽德與液化天然氣日本建立了戰略關係，涉及三個要素：斯卡伯勒合資企業的股權、潛在的液化天然氣承購以及在新能源機遇上的合作。Woodside已與LJ Scarborough Pty Ltd(LNG Japan)簽訂買賣協議，出售Scarborough合資公司10%的非經營性參股權益。LNG日本首席執行官Kyo Onojima先生表示，他很高興能在LNG日本和伍德賽德之間建立戰略合作關係。我們很高興加入斯卡伯勒合資企業，並期待着敲定液化天然氣承購協議，探索新能源領域的商機。他説。日本的國家政策？第六個戰略能源計劃？我們將在需求方面轉向天然氣，並通過甲烷化等方式對天然氣進行脱碳，這對降低熱需求具有重要作用。我們還將努力進一步加強天然氣的彈性。第一個NDC？韓國正在尋求大幅減少燃煤發電，同時增加可再生能源。老化的燃煤電廠將被關閉或將燃料從煤炭轉向液化天然氣(LNG)。太陽能和風能的利用也將擴大。？4？韓國顯著提高了2030年部署電力和氫能汽車等零排放汽車的目標。？5中國？更新：首屆國家發改委中國將嚴格控制燃煤項目，嚴格限制十四期煤炭消費增長，並在十五期間逐步壓低煤炭消費。加快風能和太陽能的規模化發展，因地制宜發展水電，在確保安全的前提下有序推進核電，加快儲能、氣電等調峯發電。中國將推動可再生能源、氫能、智能電網和儲能、CCUS、循環經濟、低碳交通和智慧城市、氣候變化影響和風險評估等各領域的技術突破，支持綠色低碳轉型。？澳日部長級經濟對話聯合部長聲明？， https://www.trademinister.gov.au/minister/don-farrell/statements/australia-japan-ministerial-economic-dialogue-joint-ministerial-statement.伍德賽德2號，2023年。？宣佈伍德賽德將斯卡伯勒10%的權益出售給液化天然氣日本？， https://www.woodside.com/docs/default-source/asx-announcements/2023-asx/woodside-to-sell-10-scarborough-interest-to-lng-japan.pdf?sfvrsn=caa9b47f_3.請注意，將斯卡伯勒合資企業15.1%的股份出售給JERA也是雙方對需求充滿信心的一個例子。參見Woodside將15.1%的Scarborough權益出售給jera？(2024年2月23日)的公告。3日本經濟產業省，2021年。？《戰略能源規劃綱要》，第11頁， https://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/category/others/basic_plan/pdf/6th_outline.pdf.4大韓民國，2021年。？根據《巴黎協定》提交的材料：大韓民國？S加強更新其第一個國家確定的貢獻？，第2頁， https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/211223_The%20Republic%20of%20Korea%27s%20Enhanced%20Update%20 of%20its%20First%20Nationally%20Determined%20Contribution_211227_editorial%20change.pdf.。5大韓民國，2021年。？根據《巴黎協定》提交的材料：大韓民國？S加強更新其第一個國家確定的貢獻？，第3頁，https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/211223_The%20Republic%20of%20Korea%27s%20Enhanced%20Update%20 of%20its%20First%20Nationally%20Determined%20Contribution_211227_editorial%20change.pdf.。6中國，2022年。？中國？S的成就、國家自主貢獻的新目標和新措施？，第34頁， https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/China%E2%80%99s%20Achievements%2C%20New%20Goals%20and%20New%20Measures%20for%20Nationally%20確定%20貢獻。pdf，伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告

5.0風險管理氣體可用於 建築材料的生產，如鋼材和混凝土。

5.1 Risk management framework Woodside is committed to managing all risks including climate-related risks in a proactive and effective manner. We apply a structured and comprehensive approach to the identification, assessment and treatment of current risks and in response to emerging risks. Woodside recognises that risk is inherent in our business and the effective management of risk is vital to deliver our strategic objectives, continued growth and success. Our approach to risk management aims to enable us to take risk in return for reward, protect us against negative impacts and improve our resilience to emerging risks. Our framework is aligned with the overarching principles of the International Standard ISO31000 for risk management, providing line of sight of risk at appropriate levels of the organisation, including the Executive Leadership Team and the Board, based on defined materiality thresholds. Woodside?s risk management process is presented as an iterative sequence that we undertake in a coordinated manner. The process helps us implement risk management to effectively identify, assess, and control risks, thereby enhancing the likelihood of achieving our objectives. The process involves: communication and consultation with key stakeholders define risk scope, context and criteria risk assessment risk treatment monitor and review risk management process; and record and report risks. Woodside?s climate risks are managed in accordance with our risk appetite statement. As part of the iterative risk management process described above, materiality is determined using a range of factors, including the potential impact of the risk (in both ?nancial and non-?nancial terms) and the likelihood of the risk occurring over various time horizons. For more information on consideration of materiality for risk, please refer to section 3.10 of the Annual Report 2023. A key objective of our approach is to provide a single consolidated enterprise-wide view of risk to quantify our exposure, and prioritise management and governance practices. Our assessment of risk considers both ?nancial and non-?nancial exposures, including health and safety; environment; ?nance; reputation and brand; legal and compliance; social and culture. Climate change is one of the seven strategic risks within Woodside?s strategic risk profile, which is described in our Annual Report 2023. The Board and Executive Leadership Team review the strategic risk pro?le twice a year, including management of current risk and resilience to emerging risks. This means that the risk management framework described in this section is speci?cally applied to consideration of climate-related risks and opportunities. This includes the evaluation of climate-related risk, and communication of this evaluation to senior management, Executive Leadership Team and the Board. Refer to Annual Report 2023 section 3.9 for information. The risk management framework helps to provide an integrated and coordinated approach to the management of climate change across the business and that the risks posed by the transition to a lower carbon economy are recognised, including changes in policy, regulation or social expectations in current or future markets. This enables the prioritisation of risk, ensuring that the relative signi?cance of climate-related risks alongside other risks is clear and addressed objectively. The identi?ed potential key climate-related risks and opportunities are described on pages 59-61 and a focus on physical risks is on pages 62-63. Risk management process WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 57

風險偏好伍德賽德？風險偏好表是 一套以原則為基礎的定性表，以呈現董事會的集體一致觀點？他願意冒險追求我們的戰略目標。它為高管和高級管理團隊提供關於可接受風險類型 和數量的指導，旨在鼓勵有意識的參與和知情的決策，與其他公司政策（包括我們的氣候政策）保持一致。我們的風險和容忍行為Woodside認識到， 當面臨挑戰和不確定性時，正是我們各級領導人的行動、行為和反應塑造了我們的文化。2023年，伍德賽德更新了？我們的風險與合規行為？為促進強大風險和合規文化的積極 行為提供指導的框架。這些行為認識到，我們生活和工作的世界在不斷變化，我們需要適應，以作為一個企業蓬勃發展。他們認識到有必要面對和擁抱風險，挑戰我們傳統的工作方式，做出勇敢的決定，同時確保彼此的安全，遵守法律，保持我們的社會經營許可。風險登記冊Woodside通過使用風險登記冊工具優先考慮風險管理行動和 治理。登記冊內的功能提供了透明度，並增強了高級領導人有效管理和治理氣候相關風險的能力，包括檢查識別？解決或管理風險的行動 已關閉。風險和機遇下表（下3頁）描述了潛在的氣候相關風險和機遇影響伍德賽德？的業務、戰略和財務規劃，包括對財務狀況和績效的潛在影響以及潛在的緩解措施。這並不一定意味着風險已在實踐中出現或目前正在採取緩解措施。該表使用TCFD 框架顯示。氣體用於各種高温工業過程，如磚和陶瓷的生產。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Limited 58

5.2 *Timeframe:1 S: now to 2025 (short) Key climate-related risks and opportunities M: 2026-2035 (medium) L: 2036 and beyond (long) Timeframe* Type of potential impact Potential ?nancial impacts Potential mitigations S M L Policy and legal risks Exposure to litigation Increased operating costs Adopt and deliver targets for net equity emissions reduction . Deferred revenue from project startups due to delays to, or failure to Report in alignment with climate-related ?nancial disclosure Delays to, or failure to obtain, regulatory approvals obtain, regulatory approvals requirements in Australia and equivalent requirements in other change Increased pricing or other regulatory control of emissions Asset valuation changes jurisdictions we are active in and have a significant presence market Mandates or controls on hydrocarbon product use or access to Legal costs and fines Build a diverse carbon credits portfolio and growth acreage Increased decommissioning costs Engage regulators and stakeholders climate Increased emissions reporting requirements Shareholder divestment Monitor global policy and legal developments to Diversity of geographical footprint Access to capital technology Selldown in equity share relating Technology legal, Unsuccessful investment in new technologies Loss of research and development expenditure Technology collaboration and partnerships Increased operating costs Opportunity management process Higher than expected costs of transition to new technologies policy, Impact on revenue Maintain internal capability with proven track record requirements Overreliance on policy support to support commerciality Jurisdictional diversity for leveraging legislative incentives extensive Technology disruption Inability to develop at scale due to competition for resources, risks adaptation people or technology entail and Market may Faster than expected substitution of hydrocarbon products Lower demand for hydrocarbon, new energy or lower carbon services Implement strategy to be a low cost, lower carbon company Transition relative to investment case Scope 3 emissions plan Slower than expected adoption of new energy and lower Natural gas crowded out of carbon budget by coal and/or unable to Capital allocation framework mitigation carbon services economy achieve attractive pricing Slower than expected phase-out of coal Customer and market engagement Under or over investment in product portfolio components Scenario analysis carbon address Uncertainty/regional variation in transition pathways Modified and unstable tax and fiscal settings Portfolio and market diversity to lower Demand destruction due to disorderly transition or being an Stranded assets and associated impact on asset valuations Carbon border adjustment mechanisms or related policy unpreferred provider Selldown in equity share a world to Reputation the for Increased stakeholder concern Increased operating costs Adopt and deliver targets for net equity Scope 1 and 2 Increased capital costs emissions reduction Targets fail to meet stakeholder expectations transition order Exacerbated policy and legal risks Scope 3 emissions plan in Stigmatisation of hydrocarbon energy sector Impact on revenue Report in alignment with climate-related ?nancial disclosure global requirements in Australia and equivalent requirements in other Inhibited growth Constrained access to talent jurisdictions we are active in and have a significant presence The Shareholder divestment changes Constrained access to capital Engage regulators and stakeholders Inability to pursue range of climate-related pathways Sustainability planning and engagement Targeted extreme activism 1 Woodside has selected these short, medium and long term timeframes re?ecting the nature of its business. The short term period can impact its current producing assets and sanctioned projects; the medium term timeframe could impact on these current assets and sanctioned projects as well as opportunities under active evaluation but not yet subject to a ?nal investment decision; and the long term timeframe could impact on both these categories of asset and project as well as opportunities beyond current consideration WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 59

時間範圍 * 潛在影響類型潛在 ？財務影響潛在緩解措施S M L急性。極端天氣事件的頻率、嚴重程度和/或持續時間增加，資產損壞/資產壽命縮短，設施設計可承受惡劣操作環境，如熱帶 旋風、颶風、降雨、洪水、風暴潮、生產減少設備宂餘/避免中斷閃電、狂風、防止火災和/或熱浪增加應急響應相關成本維持關鍵安全 設備和控制系統組織供應鏈和物流中斷和/或成本增加供應鏈業務和績效規劃勞動力生產率下降HSE文化和程序植樹表現不佳 應急響應計劃和程序提供供應商關係框架和多樣性？陽年度預防性火災維護和碳抵消來源組合多樣性帶來的地理影響金融影響 股權出售風險具有間接的物理可能性和變化資產長期氣候模式的變化，例如環境變暖生產減少設計設施以承受惡劣的操作環境，應對温度、海平面上升 、海岸侵蝕、水資源減少，勞動力生產率下降植樹區設備宂餘/氣候減少和降雨量減少維護安全所需的運營和資本成本增加 關鍵設備和控制系統維護因植樹表現不佳而損害當前績效HSE文化和程序碳抵消來源組合的地理多樣性風險直接將海水淡化作為獲取技術選項 有關Woodside如何管理物理風險的更多信息，包括在特別脆弱的地點（如位於惡劣環境中的設施），請參閲第62—63頁。伍德賽德？氣候變遷行動計劃 與2023年進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 60

時間範圍 * 潛在影響類型潛在 ？財務影響潛在推動因素S M L資源效率燃料氣節省轉移到銷售氣體增加銷售收入資產脱碳計劃更有效的運輸船隊新收入流優化參考計劃降低運營 成本範圍3排放計劃在？供應商更高效的建築庫存回收廢棄材料生產能源使用可再生能源發電增加產量同時開發新能源業務使用高效 技術降低運營成本設計排放減少碳成本風險資產脱碳計劃變更。能源存儲產品和服務多樣化的產品和服務組合，包括天然氣，減少需求側風險 資本配置框架氣候組織脱碳途徑實現有吸引力的定價能力技術合作和夥伴關係，以開發新業務線更低的運營成本組合 多樣性客户和市場參與機會適應新技術，用於預測實體風險和市場機會利用公共部門激勵措施降低開發成本讓監管機構參與，利益相關者減少與客户、研究機構和氣候相關倡導的合作伙伴關係，擴大行業組織客户和市場參與進入新市場的合作伙伴關係，推動市場開發努力在生產協議和諒解備忘錄中作出規定，包括石油，天然氣和新能源機會多樣化的收入來源資本分配框架獲得可持續融資更好的競爭地位，以反映消費者的不斷變化實現淨權益減排目標降低供應鏈偏好中的氣候風險範圍3排放計劃資本分配戰略？產品流之間的ex Woodside？氣候變遷行動計劃與2023年進展 報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 61

5.3 Managing physical risk Woodside?s assets are designed to withstand extreme weather events, we have specialised teams that support the safe and reliable design and operation of our facilities. Physical risks can arise from both event driven (acute) and longer-term shifts (chronic) in climate patterns. These physical risks may have ?nancial implications for organisations. For example, in the oil and gas industry, this might include harsh weather or ocean conditions that can damage or disrupt the ability to safely operate offshore facilities, shipping and onshore processing plants. Woodside has decades of experience designing and operating facilities located in harsh environments. Woodside?s facilities are subject to oceanic conditions and are located in regions that experience tropical cyclones, hurricanes and high ambient temperatures. Physical risks could also impact emerging new businesses in new energy products and lower carbon services. For example, this could include bush?re or drought risk for nature-based carbon origination projects, or access to water for use in electrolysis for hydrogen. DESIGN OF WOODSIDE?S FACILITIES Each Woodside facility is built in accordance with a basis of design (BOD). This details, amongst other things, the climatic conditions that facilities need to withstand. Each BOD is reviewed against updates to climatic conditions and, where required, actions are taken to update procedures or replace/ refurbish equipment to withstand the revised conditions. For new facilities and refurbishments, the requirements for maximum air temperature and sea level in the BODs are aligned to IPCC Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2-4.5 (the SSP 2-4.5) in which global temperatures rise by 2.7C by the end of the century. Design sensitivities are also performed against SSP 5-8.5 pathway in which global temperatures rise by 4.4C. (Note that the BOD is intended to describe harsh environmental conditions that a facility may need to withstand, hence the alignment with and sensitivities for higher temperature outcomes by 2100 rather than 2C or 1.5C global temperature rise outcomes).1 Woodside designs its assets to withstand extreme weather events that occur in the range of 1 in 1,000 years to 1 in 10,000 years. This is also speci?ed in each BOD.2 These time periods and the approach of using IPCC SSPs has historically been used at heritage Woodside assets and will be incorporated across the merged portfolio for new assets. WOODSIDE?S CAPABILITY Some relevant teams within the Woodside organisation include: Meteorology Metocean specialists quantify the potential and impact and effect of meteorological and Oceanography oceanographic conditions on Woodside?s (Metocean) facilities. This includes waves, climate variability, tropical cyclones, hurricanes, air temperature and rainfall. This analysis is used to de?ne technical requirements for existing and new facilities. Health, Health, safety and environment specialists Safety and support the business by providing guidelines Environment on safe operating conditions. Examples include the wellbeing of people working in high ambient temperature environments and maintenance of safety critical systems and equipment. Asset Asset management teams are responsible for Management managing asset speci?c risks, such as structural integrity risks from weather related events and risks to production forecasts from weather related outages. Regular risk governance meetings are held to review the management of these risks. Emergency Emergency management specialists support Management the business in the development of emergency response plans and capabilities and with response to any emergency events. This includes preparation for and response to tropical cyclones and hurricanes. 1 This is based on outputs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). CMIP coordinates climate model simulations worldwide under the World Climate Research Program (WCRP). CMIP supports the IPCC Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. These Shared Socioeconomic Pathways explore the implications of future socioeconomic development on climate change mitigation, adaptation and land use. 2 Acquired assets are not designed by Woodside and the historic asset owner may have speci?ed different extreme weather events in the BOD. Ruby and Angostura were both designed to withstand extreme weather events that occur in the range of 1 in 100 years. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 62

實際風險管理實例氣候變化 預計將導致更頻繁和/或更嚴重的氣旋或颶風。這些問題有可能損壞設備、導致更多的生產中斷和/或縮短資產壽命。伍德賽德擁有幾十年來一直在受颶風或颶風影響的地區運營的資產。這些在岸和離岸資產的設計和維護是為了在極端條件下安全運營。已制定了氣旋前/颶風季節準備、緊接熱帶氣旋前的準備以及切斷連接和遣散以在氣旋期間保護人員和資產安全的程序。在2020年2月澳大利亞西北部的強熱帶氣旋“達米恩”期間和2021年8月墨西哥灣的“艾達”颶風期間，對資產的設計和維護以及應急程序進行了測試。這些事件沒有造成重大損害，恢復了正常的生產水平。生產計劃和預測包括 對氣旋/颶風和嚴重湧浪的假設。這些假設是由前幾個季節的數據以及對即將到來的厄爾尼諾和拉尼娜週期的預測得出的。氣候變化預計將導致降雨量和降雨量強度的變化。這可能會導致洪水或乾旱，這可能會影響伍德賽德？S的設施和/或碳源項目。伍德賽德？S工廠的排水系統設計符合相關的國際和澳大利亞標準。在受氣旋影響的地區，排水和圍堵系統也會在氣旋季節之前進行檢查，因為這個季節可能會有強降雨或洪水。在我們的碳源項目中，面臨乾旱風險和污染的風險是通過持有不同地理分佈的項目來管理的。氣候變化預計將導致更熱和/或更乾燥的氣候導致叢林退化的頻率和/或嚴重性增加。在伍德賽德運營位於叢林易發地區的石油和天然氣生產資產的地方，它將叢林準備作為應急計劃的標準部分。此外，我們許多石油和天然氣生產資產的地理位置天生就具有較低的叢林風險敞口，例如，因為它們被灌木/巖石包圍或位於海上。伍德賽德？S的碳源投資組合包括植樹。植樹地點的多樣性減少了森林火災風險對投資組合的潛在影響。氣候 變化正在提高環境温度。這可能會造成更熱的工作條件，影響我們人民的福祉和一些設備的可操作性。我們人民的健康和福祉是我們的文化和運營實踐中固有的 。例如，防曬和補水經常作為主題包括在現場交流和安全簡介中。澳大利亞西北部的設施經歷了高温環境。大型維護活動的現場人員數量明顯增加，目標是在較涼爽的月份執行，以最大限度地減少暴露在熱應激下。生產計劃和預測包括對環境温度的假設，認識到較高的環境温度會降低工廠的績效。氣候變化正在導致海平面上升，有可能影響近海和沿海設施。伍德賽德？S工廠根據BOD進行設計，其中包括與工廠相關的海平面假設。在極端總水位(海平面、潮汐高度、風暴潮和波峯高度的組合)的計算中包括海平面上升的容許量。BOD文件中對海平面的假設 基於氣專委共享的社會經濟路徑。澳大利亞西北部卡拉塔地區的1，2次風暴潮也包括在氣旋準備計劃中。1氣專委的共同社會經濟途徑 探討未來社會經濟發展對氣候變化緩解、適應和土地利用的影響。2本段中使用IPCC SSP的方法歷來在伍德賽德遺產資產中使用，隨着時間的推移將被併入合併後的投資組合中。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司63

6.0參與度

6.1政策參與Woodside將其宣傳 調整為支持《巴黎協定》的目標。我們還審查了行業協會的會員資格，並鼓勵它們將其立場和宣傳活動與《巴黎協定》的目標保持一致。協商性對話和不同的觀點 伍德賽德透明地披露了其倡導，包括它向政府提交的意見。我們還定期發佈行業協會會員資格及其活動的回顧。我們承認並不是每個人都同意我們的觀點，例如，關於天然氣在能源轉型中的作用，就像有些人會辯論核能、風力發電場或碳捕獲的可取性一樣。我們尊重一些人會有政策偏好，但我們不接受主張天然氣與氣候目標不一致的説法？相反，我們會透過與投資者的接觸和公開報告，清楚解釋我們的觀點的基礎。這是我們對 氣候相關倡導的分析與InfluenceMap等團體的分析的一個關鍵區別，後者將我們對石油和天然氣在能源結構中作用的支持描述為？與政府間氣候變化專門委員會（IPCC）和國際能源署（IEA）的研究結果不一致？#21431；？uenceMap並解釋説，基於本報告所述的理由，我們拒絕接受這一意見。伍德賽德？氣候轉變行動計劃及2023年進展報告我們的披露旨在幫助 投資者透明地評估我們的表現，並確定我們的方法是否符合他們的風險偏好。對我們的方法的分歧可能有助於進行建設性的辯論，我們歡迎反饋，以保持我們的過渡計劃響應 股東的期望。在公眾討論中，有不同的意見1。一些團體可能會選擇將他們不同意的方法貼上“洗綠”的標籤。綠色清洗是一種真實的現象，應該受到監管和公開批評，但濫用它作為標籤也不利於公眾的理解，可能會抑制知識和思想的自由交流，從而促進能源轉型 。行業協會伍德賽德作為一個單獨的組織和通過一系列行業協會成員參與政策宣傳。我們的目標是使我們自己的政策參與和我們協會的政策參與(在可能的情況下)保持一致，以支持《巴黎協定》的温度目標。我們的詳細行業協會評估於2023年更新，可在Wood side.com上查閲。2.2023年12月在阿拉伯聯合酋長國舉行的COP28全球氣候峯會重申了這一目標，強調了1.5攝氏度目標的重要性，並決心實現這一目標。3我們鼓勵讀者在www.unfcc.int上查看整個COP28決定文本，因為我們在這裏只能提供一個節略版本，以引起人們對與我們業務最關鍵的聯繫的關注。表中提供了這些鏈接，對吧。締約方會議第二十八屆會議的決定文本--第一次全球評估的結果？3本報告中伍德賽德締約方會議作為《巴黎協定》締約方會議的鏈接：呼籲締約方考慮到《巴黎協定》及其不同的國情，以國家自主的方式為下列全球努力作出貢獻(第28節)，見第43-55頁，説明伍德賽德如何將對不同國家情況、途徑和辦法的分析納入其業務規劃。 影響地圖，2023年。？伍德賽德？氣候政策參與：公司的現實衡量標準？氣候戰略？https://influencemap.org/report/Woodside-s-Real-Climate- Strategy-22060.《氣候公約》，2015年。？巴黎協定？第2條. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_ ？第一次全球盤點的結果？（未經編輯的預發稿）。https://unfccc.int/documents/636584

2023年與氣候有關的倡導以下是包含與氣候有關的內容或立場的演講和意見書的列表。欲瞭解更多信息，請訪問伍德賽德網站。關於政府政策的意見書澳大利亞保障機制諮詢文件關於制定、跟蹤和實現澳大利亞？S減排目標的諮詢天然氣戰略的未來氣候相關？財務披露：第二輪諮詢碳泄漏審查對倫敦議定書的調查ACCU審查執行計劃新加坡的審查 澳大利亞綠色能源協議(GEA)指導天然氣市場行為的強制性行為守則參議院對天然氣市場行為守則的調查在編制環境計劃的過程中對行為守則的諮詢調查西澳國內天然氣 政策國家電力修正案(針對傳輸網絡服務提供商的優惠融資)規則美國能源部清潔能源示範辦公室？建立需求方支持機制的意向通知 能源部(DOE)清潔氫氣樞紐(持續)在削減法案第45v條清潔氫氣生產税收抵免議會聽證會澳大利亞眾議院調查倫敦議定書 (與跨境運輸CO？對於CCS)澳大利亞參議院對保障機制的調查澳大利亞2023年澳大利亞石油和天然氣(AOG)能源會議：最大化價值和能源增長 澳大利亞美國商會(AmCham)：與Meg O？Neill澳大利亞國內天然氣展望(ADGO)2023年會議：主旨演講澳大利亞能源生產商(AEP)2023年會議和展覽：開幕詞 澳大利亞經濟發展早餐委員會(CEDA)西澳能源過渡峯會：澳大利亞經濟發展的綠色過渡基礎設施委員會(CEDA)澳大利亞天然氣的未來Wa 活動：主旨演講國家記者俱樂部：通過石油工程師協會的能源轉型實現能源安全西澳大利亞州季節開幕：在複雜和困難的時期需要哪些領導技能Wa Korea經濟論壇： 主旨演講世界能源城市夥伴關係AGM活動國際2023年能源情報論壇：領導力對話CERAWeek 2023：石油和天然氣？2023年CERAWeek：駕馭動盪的能源市場CERAWeek 2023：勞動力的多樣性：創造價值Gastech全球商業領袖首席執行官小組討論：通過協作的商業模式和建設性的合作伙伴關係轉變全球能源LNG2023全體會議2：動盪的能源轉型的挑戰離岸技術會議2023年：東帝汶崛起，其更大的朝陽油田石油工程師學會年度技術會議和展覽：擴大機會，可持續地為世界特立尼達和多巴哥能源提供燃料 2023年會議：導航複雜的能源未來Wood Mackenzie？S全球能源峯會：主旨案例研究：保障機制倡導保障機制是澳大利亞S對工業設施減排的主要規定 。伍德賽德倡導建立一個公平、穩健和透明的機制來減少澳大利亞的排放量，包括鼓勵企業根據澳大利亞S的減排目標進行投資、創新和採用更智能的做法和技術。1我們對改革的倡導繼續包括：鼓勵改變重要的減排機會，如可再生電力進口和CCS。加快《巴黎協定》第六條規定的國際碳信用的雙邊安排。量身定做對能源密集型貿易的支持？工業。關於基線量化的技術諮詢，包括新設施的技術諮詢。重點關注我們與國際石油和天然氣協會的合作國際石油和天然氣協會是全球石油和天然氣協會，旨在推動能源轉型中的環境和社會績效，是應聯合國環境規劃署的要求於1974年成立的。2伍德賽德是積極的參與者：伍德賽德？S代表是國際能源政策與政策研究所？S的全球執行成員，並被指定為他們的？氣候冠軍？；伍德賽德？S代表主持了編寫和出版了關於石油和天然氣在能源轉型中的作用的情況説明書的工作隊；伍德賽德專家參加了工作組，就範圍3的排放核算、碳補償產品的作用和剛剛過渡的方法制定了指導方針；伍德塞德的一位專家出席了政府間氣候變化專門委員會？S會議，代表國際政策研究所完成了第六次評估(第六次評估)綜合報告(政策制定者摘要)。伍德賽德，2023年。？保障機制諮詢文件？， https://www.woodside.com/docs/default-source/sustainability-documents/transparency-documents/2023-government-submissions-reports/submission-to-safeguard-mechanism-consultation-paper-woodside.pdf?sfvrsn=2a208822_3.IPIECA。？關於我們？， https://www.ipieca.org/about.伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司66

6.2行業倡議伍德賽德加入了一系列行業倡議，以提供領導和倡導，向同行學習，並檢查我們的方法是否符合適當的全球實踐。1 COP28阿聯酋，2023年。？《石油和天然氣脱碳憲章》，https:// www.cop28.com/en/news/2023/12/Oil-Gas-Decarbonization-Charter-launched-to—accelerate-climate-action.2 TCFD，2017。？與氣候有關的財務披露工作隊的建議？，https://assets.bbhub.io/company/ sites/60/2021/10/FINAL-2017-TCFD-Report.pdf 3 https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/energy/what-we-do/methane/oil-gas-methane-partnership-20-ogmp-20 4 OGCI，2021年。？旨在實現甲烷零排放倡議？Https:// aimingforzero.ogci.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Aiming-for-Zero-text.pdf 5 OGMP，2023年。《實施計劃指南》，第2頁，http：//ogmpartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OGMP-2.0-Implementation-Plan-Guidance_2.pdf.OGMP提供了OGCI 上游作業的集體平均目標，作為接近零的例子。排放強度。6 MGP，2017。甲烷指導原則？Methaneguidingprinciples.org/about/the-methane-guiding-principles/7世界銀行，2015年。減少天然氣燃燒的全球倡議：到2030年實現零常規燃燒？2023年，https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/a903b5e6456991faf3b5e079bba0391a-0400072021/related/ZRF-Initiative-text-list-map-104.pdf成為第一家簽署《石油和天然氣脱碳憲章》的澳大利亞公司。在締約方會議第二十八屆會議期間，第二十八屆締約方會議主席和沙特阿拉伯王國宣佈，已有50家石油和天然氣公司加入了《石油和天然氣脱碳憲章》，這是一份致力於大規模影響和加快行業內氣候行動的全球行業憲章。氣候相關財務披露特別工作組(TCFD)2伍德賽德於2021年成為TCFD的官方支持者。 TCFD發佈了與氣候相關的財務披露建議，旨在幫助公司提供更好的信息，以支持知情的資本配置。披露建議圍繞四個主題領域構建，這四個主題領域代表了公司運營方式的核心要素：治理、戰略、風險管理以及指標和目標。在完成《2023年狀況報告》後，TCFD組織已解散，其工作將由國際財務報告準則(IFRS)基金會推進。國際財務報告準則基金會正在主持國際可持續發展標準委員會(ISSB)的工作，該委員會的報告標準建立在TCFD工作的基礎上。伍德賽德繼續使用TCFD的建議，同時等待澳大利亞實施與氣候有關的財務披露要求，以及我們積極參與並具有顯著影響力的其他司法管轄區的同等要求。石油和天然氣甲烷 合作伙伴2.0(OGMP)3伍德賽德於2024年加入OGMP 2.0。OGMP 2.0是聯合國環境規劃署-S的旗艦油氣報告和緩解方案。OGMP 2.0是石油和天然氣行業唯一一個全面的、基於測量的報告框架，可提高甲烷排放報告的準確性和透明度。這是確定該部門甲烷緩解行動優先順序的關鍵。甲烷指導原則(MGP)6伍德賽德於2018年加入MGP。MGP 重點關注減少整個天然氣供應鏈甲烷排放的優先行動領域。它們是由行業和民間社會組織聯盟於2017年合作開發的。5個優先領域是：1.持續減少甲烷排放2.推動整個天然氣供應鏈的強勁表現3.提高甲烷排放數據的準確性4.倡導健全的甲烷排放政策和法規5.提高透明度以實現甲烷零排放 倡議4.伍德賽德能源公司成為簽署目標為零倡議的第一家澳大利亞公司。該倡議由石油和天然氣氣候倡議(OGCI)發起，旨在鼓勵石油和天然氣行業將甲烷排放削減到接近零的水平。5它呼籲採取全員參與的方法，像石油和天然氣行業已經對待安全的那樣認真對待甲烷排放：目標是零，並努力實現這一目標所需的一切。目標為零是對MGP、OGMP 2.0和全球甲烷承諾等關鍵舉措的補充。2030年前零常規燃燒(ZRF)倡議7伍德賽德於2017年加入ZRF。該倡議由世界銀行發起，由全球燃燒和減少甲烷夥伴關係(GFMR)管理。它要求各國政府和企業不遲於2030年結束常規做法。該倡議旨在促進所有利益攸關方之間的合作，以便確定並實施結束常規天然氣開採的解決方案。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司67

6.3剛剛過渡伍德賽德認識到公正過渡對我們的客户、我們的員工和我們運營所在的社區以及從我們的運營中受益的人的重要性。《巴黎協定》強調氣候變化行動、應對措施和影響與公平獲得可持續發展和消除貧困之間的內在關係？1它還考慮到勞動力的公正轉型以及創造體面工作和高質量就業的必要性？1伍德賽德承認，能源轉型將改變我們開展業務的方式。為了實現公正的過渡，這一變化的規模將需要政府、行業、投資者和社區之間的承諾和合作。在締約方會議第二十八屆會議上，締約方通過了一項關於公正過渡途徑的工作方案。該計劃將涵蓋的主題包括公正和公平的過渡，其中包括能源、社會經濟、勞動力和其他方面的途徑，所有這些方面都必須基於國家定義的發展優先事項，幷包括社會保護，以減輕與過渡相關的潛在影響。？2協作伍德賽德參與各種國際論壇，鼓勵跨行業信息共享和協作。伍德賽德認識到，當企業、政府、工人、社區和其他利益相關者共同努力時，公正的過渡最有可能是有效的。我們的做法是由我們在IPIECA-S剛剛過渡特別工作組的成員 提供的。該工作組的目標是在企業制定脱碳計劃時支持合作和分享有效的做法。伍德賽德也是氣候領袖聯盟(CLC)的成員。CLC是由跨行業的澳大利亞企業首席執行官組成的組織，支持《巴黎協定》的承諾並設定公共脱碳目標。2023年，《中圖法》發表了《向淨零的可信過渡》。入門的實際見解？，其中 包含了考慮剛剛過渡的指導。3《聯合國氣候變化框架公約》，2015。？《巴黎協定》，序言。《聯合國氣候變化框架公約》，2023年。？阿拉伯聯合酋長國剛剛過渡工作方案？ (未經編輯的預覽版)。Https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma5_auv_5_JTWP.pdf氣候領袖聯盟，2023年。？向淨零的可信過渡：開始的實踐見解？， https://www.climateleaders.org.au/publications/credibletransition/伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司68

伍德賽德？S接近獲得能源我們認為我們在提供能源方面的作用是我們對公正能源過渡的貢獻的核心。聯合國可持續發展目標7是“確保所有人都能獲得負擔得起、可靠、可持續和現代化的能源”。石油和天然氣資產在其生產壽命結束時退役是石油和天然氣行業生命週期的固有部分。2023年，伍德賽德在我們的投資組合中花費了約5.3億美元執行退役工作。退役規劃早在資產使用壽命結束之前就開始了，包括利益相關者的參與，以解決我們所在社區的環境、法規和社會後果。利益相關者參與伍德賽德致力於與我們的員工、我們運營的社區、受影響的利益相關者和與我們有關係的企業進行社會對話。社會影響管理我們建立關係，以便在我們活動的所有階段持續參與。 瞭解我們活動的環境和社會影響，包括人權，嵌入到我們的項目管理框架中。我們對西澳大利亞卡拉塔附近陸上天然氣業務的最新社會影響評估包括與當地社區就一系列情景進行接觸，包括增長和下降。我們的社會績效框架指導我們分享有關我們活動的及時信息，並瞭解我們活躍並具有重要影響力的社區的期望。我們與供應商合作，將這種方法嵌入到我們的價值鏈中，並將在過渡期間繼續這樣做。我們目前在新能源和低碳服務團隊中僱傭了大約240名員工，其中大多數人已經從我們的基礎業務中重新部署。在可能的情況下，我們將繼續尋求對現有員工進行再培訓和重新培訓，以便他們能夠過渡到這些機會。 有關我們方法的更多信息，請訪問我們的網站。剛剛過渡的關鍵利益相關者伍德賽德認識到，我們的員工、供應商、東道國社區和客户是與剛剛過渡相關的關鍵利益相關者。我們可以通過承諾定期讓利益相關者參與、在我們的項目中包含本地內容，以及通過社會投資和員工發展來建設能力和能力，來幫助準備和管理過渡，所有這些都在整個組織內得到了很好的確立。關於利益相關者參與的更多信息可以在我們的網站上找到。員工隊伍我們支持包容性的工作場所，使我們能夠利用擁有不同知識、經驗、方法和思維方式的團隊 提供的多元化思維。供應商我們與與我們的願景一致的供應商合作，並分享我們的承諾，為我們的業務、客户和社區提供更好的結果。東道主社區 伍德賽德通過幫助提高當地的能力和能力為東道主社區提供支持。有關我們的社會貢獻的最新信息，請訪問Woodside.com。[圖形顯示在此處]客户我們與客户就創新的低碳 能源解決方案開展合作。例如，CCS等服務可以幫助客户減少使用Woodside產品（或其他產品的類似產品）時產生的排放。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 69

6.4內部氣候參與伍德賽德有一個 領導的氣候變化內部小組。2023年底，該公司在COP28期間組織了為期兩週的論壇，鼓勵所有員工瞭解、談論公司的情況並採取行動。的氣候戰略。超過1000名Woodside員工，包括行政領導團隊成員，參加了論壇。展示的主題包括深入研究當前的氣候問題，探索伍德賽德？在能源轉型中的作用，以及資產脱碳的實際討論。在論壇期間，國際能源署（IEA）介紹了他們最近出版物的見解，包括？2023年世界能源展望？那呢？石油和天然氣行業在淨零轉型？report.1，2本次 演講讓Woodsiders有機會直接聽取IEA關於他們的氣候情景、支撐這些情景的假設以及能源生產商在轉型中的關鍵作用。本次會議還強調了 與能源行業的主要利益相關者進行公開對話的重要性。美國石油學會（API）介紹了他們對美國的見解？政策格局及其對石油和天然氣行業在能源轉型中的作用的看法。 API與與會者分享了他們對COP28和不斷演變的全球氣候政策格局的見解。珀斯外部基調：國際能源署（IEA）2023年世界能源展望休斯頓外部基調：COP28從美國石油研究所（API）的視角IEA，2023年。？2023年世界能源展望All rights reserved. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/42b23c45-78bc-4482-b0f9-eb826ae2da3d/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf ？石油和天然氣行業在淨零轉型。All rights reserved. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/41800202-d427-44fa-8544-12e3d6e023b4/TheOilandGasIndustryinNetZeroTransitions.pdf S氣候變遷行動計劃和2023年進展報告Woodside Energy Group LTD 70

7.0附錄天然氣和lique？液化石油氣（LPG）都被用作烹飪的燃料，例如户外燒烤。

7.1氣候相關數據1，2與 必和必拓合併的影響？石油業務：本表中的數據受到與必和必拓合併的影響？於二零二二年六月一日生效。2021年的數據反映了伍德賽德？合併前的投資組合。2022年有5個月的合併前數據和7個 個月的合併後數據。2023 re？合併後的實體全年。度量 * 計量單位2023 2022 2021碳氫化合物產量3合計？股本kt 22，215 18，752 10，522合計？經營kt 30，679 30，361 25，807銷售（包括貿易 碳氫化合物）？股票4 kt 23，918 20，261 12，977收入？全球範圍1和2温室氣體排放6範圍1和2排放？股本（淨額）7kt CO？—e 5，532 4，615 3，235範圍1排放量？股本（毛額） kt CO？—e 6，172 5，357 3，541範圍2排放量？股本（毛額）kt CO？—e 18 13 6關於年度排放量kt CO？e 658 754 312範圍1和2排放？操作（總）2kt CO？—e 9，175 9，573 8，908範圍1排放量？ 操作（總）kt CO？—e 9，165 9，565 8，901範圍2排放量？操作（總）kt CO？—e 10 8 8權益百分比排放限制法規涵蓋的範圍1和2排放量8% 92 95 99.5權益來源範圍1温室氣體 排放燃料燃燒kt CO？—e 4，297 3，612 2，412 Flare kt CO？—e 522 688 461排氣口CO？—e 1，352 1，057 667其他kt CO？—e 0 0 0 **按國家分列的權益範圍1温室氣體排放澳大利亞kt CO？NPR NPR特立尼達和多巴哥kt CO？—e 185 NPR NPR美利堅合眾國kt CO？—e 283 NPR NPR甲烷甲烷排放量（温室當量）—e 219 193 133範圍1和範圍2中甲烷排放量的百分比% 4 4 3. 7甲烷密度？股權t CH？/kt總產量0.35 0.42 0.45甲烷濃度？公平值（Sm3/Sm3銷售天然氣）9% 0.062 0.072 0.064甲烷排放量（温室當量）？經營kt CO？—245 273 326甲烷強度？做了T CH？/kt總產量0.29 0.32 0.45甲烷濃度？操作（Sm3/Sm3市售氣體）9% 0.046 0.054 0.064 * 與此表相關的所有腳註見下一頁。伍德賽德？2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 72

公制*計量單位2023 2022 2021燃料氣10總量？燃料量t 132,862 232,299 154,546總量？燃料量t 195,855 297 135 250,562燃料量t權益t/kt 6.0 12.4 14.7燃料量t/kt 6.4 9.8 9.7全球範圍3温室氣體排放量 估計範圍3排放量？公平，總kt CO？-e 72,825 60,699 37,186範圍3排放？購買了與碳氫化合物交易有關的商品和服務？股權kt CO？-e 1,225 1,011 1,375範圍3排放？選擇了其他上游的？等值11 kt CO？-e 219 256 200範圍3排放？下游運輸和配送？當量12，13 kt CO？-e 1,728 1,477 819範圍3排放？銷售產品的使用情況，與伍德賽德的生產有關？股權kt CO？-e 64,612 53,188 27,906範圍3排放 ？銷售產品的使用，與交易的碳氫化合物有關？等值14 kt CO？-e 5,041 4,768 6,886温室氣體排放強度範圍1排放強度？權益生產(總量)kt CO？-e/kt 0.28 0.29 0.34範圍1排放 強度調整運營產量(總量)kt CO？-e/kt 0.30 0.32 0.34範圍1排放強度權益收入(總量)kt CO？-e/收入美元$m 0.44 0.32 0.51範圍1上游設施排放強度？權益產量(毛重)千克CO？-e/boe 10.3 8.1 4.1範圍1液化天然氣設施排放強度？權益生產量(總量)千克CO？-e/boe 40.2 40.3 38.4範圍1和2排放強度(淨額)kt CO？-e/kt 0.25 0.25 0.31範圍1和2排放強度運行 生產量(總量)kt CO？-e/kt 0.30 0.32 0.34範圍1、2和3排放強度(淨額)15克CO？-e/kt 65 63 58*本報告中的數額已四捨五入為最接近的計量單位。微小差異是由於 舍入造成的。**範圍1温室氣體排放的其他來源類別四捨五入為最接近的千噸。2021年的數據之前報告為0.2kt CO-e。2 1温室氣體排放量、燃料和產值的權益部分包括來自伍德賽德擁有權益部分的非經營企業的數據。在第三方提供數據的情況下，該數據已被使用。在沒有2023年數據的情況下，根據歷史數據的外推或根據歷史數據也沒有歷史數據的模擬設施的性能使用估計2運行的温室氣體排放，燃料和生產值僅針對伍德賽德運行的生產資產。3碳氫化合物生產僅包括可出口的碳氫化合物，包括液化天然氣、管道天然氣、原油、凝析油和天然氣液體(NGL)。交易的碳氫化合物不包括在內。4.交易碳氫化合物是指購買和/或出售液化天然氣貨物、原油或管道天然氣的現貨和/或帶狀貨物。5有關總營業收入的更多信息，請參閲2023年年度報告。6温室氣體排放量、能源值和全球變暖潛力是根據排放發生的司法管轄區的相關報告規定(例如，澳大利亞國家温室氣體報告和能源報告(NGER)、美國環保局温室氣體報告計劃(GHGRP))估計的。澳大利亞監管報告原則已被用於尚不存在監管規定的司法管轄區的排放。7股權排放基於《温室氣體議定書》企業標準和IPIECA石油行業報告温室氣體排放指南，2011年5月第二版。不包括生產非碳氫化合物的子公司(如航運公司)的權益排放量。8剩餘8%是由於國際資產和澳大利亞資產的排放量低於保障機制立法門檻。9甲烷強度的計算方法是將甲烷排放量除以市場上銷售的天然氣體積，包括液化天然氣、管道氣體和天然氣液體。10.2020年更新了10個火炬排放計算方法，以與nger保持一致，並將全球變暖潛力為零的惰性化合物包括在內。11.《温室氣體議定書》第1類(購買的商品和服務，不包括購買的液化天然氣的生產)、5類(運營中產生的廢物)、6類(商務旅行)和7類(員工通勤)中選定的上游排放。僅包括與伍德賽德員工和伍德賽德運營設施相關的權益排放。12包括與碳氫化合物銷售的下游運輸(温室氣體議定書第9類)有關的排放量。林德賽德從哪裏獲得信息？S股權份額報告，沒有此信息的地方100%保守報告交通排放。銷售產品在運輸過程中的燃燒沒有進行調整(例如，LNG船舶燃燒的LNG，傳輸壓縮機站使用的管道天然氣)，因此可以重複計算。132021年報告的價值僅包括伍德賽德股權液化天然氣的下游運輸。之後報告的數字包括所有伍德賽德股權生產的下游運輸。142021年報告的價值僅包括交易的液化天然氣。之後報告的數字包括所有伍德賽德交易的碳氫化合物的銷售產品的使用。15排放強度是根據淨權益範圍1和2温室氣體排放量以及權益範圍3(銷售產品的使用)和伍德賽德？S權益產量計算的。指標不包括與交易碳氫化合物相關的排放量和產量。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告 伍德賽德能源集團有限公司73

7.2關於碳2023信用額度的來源 範圍1退役和2排放項目名稱項目ID項目開發商/項目倡導者項目類型方法國家古董量達令河保護倡議ACCU計劃Terra Carbon Pty Limited人工誘導碳信用額度(Carbon 農業倡議)澳大利亞2023 64站點#7 ERF131162再生(永久偶數原生林的人為再生：1.1)方法確定2013 Colac Beltram Munberry Haredian ACCU計劃Lanin Holdings Pty Ltd，[br}Ninal Ventures Pty Ltd人工誘導碳信用(碳農業倡議)澳大利亞2021 810(CBMH)再生項目ERF101800再生(永久偶年齡段原生森林的人工再生)方法論 確定2013 Molendina土地？LL天然氣項目ACCU計劃LMS Energy Pty Ltd土地？LL氣體碳信用(碳農業倡議澳大利亞2021,214 EOP100501/陸地？LL天然氣)方法確定2015年一個東帝汶社區 金牌標準XPand基金會植樹造林/重新造林温室氣體排放-東帝汶4,050林業項目GS 4210重新造林與封存方法學安泰集團廢氣回收金標南方 極碳資產管理有限公司能效ACM0012：廢能回收中國2018年27,157發電項目(300303)GS 605？河北固原縣東新營實業VCS903河北建投新能源有限公司可再生能源ACM0002：中國2018年-2019年118,319 199.5兆瓦風電項目綜合方法論？風電併網發電，可再生能源，卡丁根泥炭地恢復，VCS 1477 PT。Rimba Makmur Utama(PT. RMU)農林VM0007：RED方法模塊印度尼西亞2018年431,956和保護項目和其他土地使用併網太陽能項目Verra VCS1890中電印度私人有限公司可再生風能ACM0002：印度2018-2019年74,161可再生能源併網發電的綜合方法體積是報廢的信用額度，每個信用額度代表一噸CO-e。2伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展 報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司74

7.3範圍3的方法、方法和做法 繼續發展，以衡量和核算範圍3的排放。伍德賽德？S的方法是在可用情況下與《温室氣體議定書》保持一致，使用股權份額方法計算排放量，並在沒有明確指導方針的領域披露其方法。1伍德賽德？S範圍3計劃的一部分是促進全球測量和報告，因此我們在力所能及的地方積極參與解決方法空白的問題。我們還監控更新，隨着標準的制定，我們將審查是否需要修改我們的方法。邊界伍德賽德目前報告了以下温室氣體協議類別的温室氣體排放量：1類別1：採購的商品和服務，與從其他上游供應商購買液化天然氣以供應我們的客户有關。對上游較小排放類別的捆綁估計，包括第1類(購買的商品和服務，交易液化天然氣除外)、第5類(運營中產生的廢物)、第6類(商務旅行)和第7類(員工通勤)。第9類： 下游運輸和分配，與向客户運輸液化天然氣有關。第11類？銷售產品的使用？與我們的石油和天然氣產品的燃燒有關。我們目前假設所有產品都被燒燬了(這是一個保守的假設，因為跟蹤準確的最終用途存在挑戰)。如果跟蹤方法有所改進，或者我們確信我們的銷售中有一部分沒有燃燒(例如，用作合成氨生產的原料)，我們可能會在未來將其納入其中。我們的總權益範圍3排放量可能會因產量變化或通過合併和收購活動而增加或減少。範圍3投資目標伍德賽德的目標是到2030年在新能源產品和低碳服務上投資50億美元(範圍3投資目標？)2這可能包括有機和無機支出。這筆資金不用於為減少伍德賽德？S淨股本範圍1和2的排放提供資金，這兩個範圍通過資產脱碳計劃單獨管理。如果一個項目既減少了伍德賽德範圍1的排放，也減少了第三方的排放，支出將相應地分攤並歸入目標。範圍3減排目標伍德賽德的目標是到2030年在新能源產品和低碳服務上採用FID，總減排能力為5 Mtpa CO-e(範圍3排放削減目標？)。相關客户2為新能源或低碳服務項目的客户，不一定也是伍德賽德？S油氣業務的客户。對於CCUS項目，伍德賽德將根據我們在CCUS項目中的股權份額將客户排放量按比例減少到目標。客户減少的排放總量將是存儲或轉換為可銷售產品的排放量。對於氫氣(包括氨氣)項目，伍德賽德將根據我們在氫氣(包括氨氣)項目中的股權份額，將避免的估計客户排放量歸因於目標。避免排放量的估計量將根據工程判斷和實踐進行計算，包括但不限於：1世界資源研究所和世界可持續發展商業理事會，2014年。17.2範圍3的目標取決於商業安排、商業可行性、監管和合資企業的批准，以及第三方活動(可能進行也可能不進行)。而不是指導。可能既包括有機投資，也包括無機投資。

天然氣被用作家庭的直接供暖來源，或通過電力間接使用。基於能源密度的當量柴油消耗量，在假設柴油燃燒的情況下，轉換為t CO-e，在銷售給重型公路運輸部門的情況下；基於能量密度的當量船用燃料消耗量，在假設船用燃料燃燒的情況下，轉換為t CO-e；在銷售給2發電部門的情況下，根據能源密度計算的當量煤炭消耗量，並轉換為假設煤炭燃燒的當量煤炭消耗量。對於可再生能源項目，伍德賽德將根據我們在可再生能源項目中的股權份額，將避免排放量的估計數量歸因於目標。預計的避免排放量將根據工程判斷和實踐進行計算，包括但不限於與相關地點電網的平均排放強度進行比較。報告範圍3排放總量和淨排放量在報告範圍3排放時，Woodside將單獨報告其範圍3排放(包括因石油和天然氣產品銷售而產生的排放量)，這是由於實施支持目標的項目而避免或減少了客户排放。合併和收購董事會可自行決定更改範圍3的任一目標，以應對因合併和收購而發生的變化。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司76

7.4術語表 * 與此表相關的所有腳註 都顯示在術語表的末尾。減少/避免、減少或去除一定量的二氧化碳或等同物。第4.2節中AR6場景數據庫的完整引用是：數據庫Edward Byers，Volker Krey，Elmar Kriegler，Keywan Riahi，Roberto Schaeffer，Jarmo Kikstra，Robin Lamboll，Zebedee Nicholls，Marit Sanstad，Chris Smith，Kaj—Ivar van der Wijst，Alaa Al Khourdajie，Franck Lecocq，Joana Portugal—Pereira，Yamina Saheb，Anders Str？曼，哈拉爾·温克勒，科妮莉亞·奧爾，埃琳娜·布魯津，馬修·吉登，菲利普·哈克斯托克，馬蒂吉斯·哈姆森，丹尼爾·胡普曼，彼得·科爾普，克萊爾·勒波特，賈裏德·劉易斯，賈科莫·馬朗戈尼，愛德華多·M？ller—Casseres，Ragnhild Skeie，Michaela Werning，Katherine Calvin，Piers Forster，Celine Guivarch，Tomoko Hasegawa，Malte Meinshausen，Glen Peters，Joeri Rogelj，Bjorn Samset，Julia Steinberger，Massimo Tavoni，Detlef van Vuuren. AR6場景數據庫由IIASA國際應用系統分析研究所託管 ，2022.doi：10.5281/zenodo.5886911| AR6—SYR IPCC，2023：氣候變化2023：綜合報告。第一、二和三工作組對政府間氣候變化專門委員會第六次評估報告的貢獻 [核心寫作團隊，H。Lee and J. Romero（eds.）]。氣專委，瑞士日內瓦，第184頁，DOI：10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647。Ar6-wg3政府間氣候變化專門委員會(2022年)。《2022年氣候變化：減緩氣候變化》。第三工作組對政府間氣候變化專門委員會第六次評估報告的貢獻？抱負伍德賽德使用這一術語來描述尋求實現結果的抱負，但實現結果受到重大不確定性和意外情況的影響，因此伍德賽德認為目前還沒有實現該結果的適當計劃或途徑。生物多樣性是指所有來源的生物體之間的變異性，除其他外，包括陸地、海洋和其他水生生態系統及其所屬的生態複合體；這包括物種內、物種間和生態系統的多樣性。1生物排序生物序列是指捕獲和儲存生物體內的碳，包括植物和樹木，以減少温室氣體排放。伍德賽德能源集團有限公司董事會碳信用由碳信用計劃發行的可交易金融工具。碳信用是指温室氣體減少到大氣或從大氣中清除的温室氣體，相當於1 TCO？-e，計算方法是基線情景與項目情景的排放量之差。碳信用是通過行政機構運營的電子登記系統(如碳信用計劃)以獨特的方式進行序列化、發放、跟蹤和報廢或行政取消的。碳信用伍德賽德評估温室氣體完整性(消除可測量、可核實且誠信不準確、非額外或非永久性的低風險)以及環境、社會和治理完整性(以對人和環境的積極(或無負面)影響為指導；以及適當的 治理措施，以防止不利後果和影響)。碳滙碳滙是森林和其他生態系統吸收碳，從而將其從大氣中移除並抵消CO？排放。(定義取自歐洲 委員會？氣候變化：常用術語和縮略語詞彙表？，https://www.eea.Europa.eu/help/glossary/eea-glossary/carbon-sink)碳捕獲和封存CCU碳捕獲和利用，也稱為碳到產品CCU 碳捕獲和封存CH？甲烷一氧化碳？二氧化碳CO？-E CO？等價物。表示七種温室氣體中每種氣體的全球變暖潛勢的通用單位，以一單位二氧化碳的全球變暖潛勢表示。它被用來評估在共同的基礎上釋放(或避免釋放)任何温室氣體。2凝析碳氫化合物在儲藏層中是氣態的，但當它們上升到地表時會凝結成液體。COP28《聯合國氣候變化框架公約》第28次締約方大會，2023年11月至12月在阿聯酋迪拜舉行。脱碳伍德賽德使用這個術語來描述具有向低碳狀態轉變的效果的活動或途徑，如本詞彙表中所述。排放是指温室氣體的排放，除非另有説明。Equity Woodside在股權温室氣體基礎上設定了範圍1和範圍2温室氣體減排目標 。這確保了其減排目標的範圍與其投資中的氣體排放經濟利益保持一致。股權排放反映的是運營產生的温室氣體排放。 根據伍德賽德？S在運營中的股權份額。它在運營中的股權份額反映了它在運營中的經濟利益，這是它對運營中流動的風險和回報的權利的程度。3 Feed前端 工程設計FID最終投資決策如果項目已經完成和/或獲得了必要的研究和設計，以便做出最終投資決策，則被視為FID準備就緒。這一決定是基於一系列財務、技術和戰略因素作出的，是項目開始建設和實施的要求。原住民是一個國家的土著人民，或已知的最早的居民。原住民原住民是土著體面的人，被認為是原住民，並被他們各自的社區所接受。注：我們承認我們所在地區原住民社區的多樣性。在與廣泛的聽眾交流時，伍德賽德交替使用土著和第一民族這兩個詞。在地方層面上，伍德賽德將接受社區的指導，以確定適當的職權範圍。Fcf自由現金？哦。來自經營活動的現金和來自投資活動的現金。伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司77

* 與此表相關的所有腳註都顯示在詞彙表的末尾 。燃燒在油氣藏中發現的氣體的控制燃燒。《京都議定書》所列的七種温室氣體是：二氧化碳；温室氣體甲烷（CH？）；一氧化二氮（N？0）； Hydro？氫氟碳化合物（HFCs）；氮三？氟化物（NF？）；per？氟化碳（PFCs）；和硫六？氟化物（SF？）。2 Goal Woodside使用這個詞廣泛涵蓋其目標和願望。温室氣體也被稱為？絕對？排放量， 總排放量是在任何合格氣體排放單位和證書之前的排放量？4 HSE健康、安全與環境IFRS國際財務報告準則基礎。欲瞭解更多信息，請參見www.example.com IRR 內部回報率合資企業LNG液化天然氣？伍德賽德使用該術語來描述與歷史和/或當前公約 或類似物相比，相關潛在温室氣體排放水平較低的特徵，例如與其他類似的資源、工藝、生產設施、產品或服務或活動有關。當應用於Woodside？關於低碳投資組合的定義，請參見低碳投資組合的定義。低碳低碳 經濟是指與今天相比，温室氣體排放量更低的經濟？的經濟。低碳對於Woodside而言，低碳投資組合是指淨權益範圍1和2投資組合温室氣體排放（包括使用抵消）正逐步減少至目標，並計劃引入新能源產品和低碳服務，以補充現有和新的石油和天然氣投資。我們的氣候政策 制定了我們認為將有助於我們實現這一目標的原則。 低碳伍德賽德使用這個術語來描述技術，如CCUS或抵消，這些技術可能是客户用於減少其淨温室氣體排放的服務。諒解備忘錄。 這是一項不具約束力的協議，概述了雙方或多方為實現共同目標或目標而共同努力的意圖。國家自主貢獻（NDC）是一個國家向《聯合國氣候變化框架公約》（UNFCCC）提交的自願氣候行動計劃，概述了他們為減少温室氣體排放和支持適應氣候變化而提出的行動和目標。這是《巴黎協定》的一個關鍵要素， 預計每個國家都將定期更新和加強其國家數據中心。 伍德賽德的淨資產其在温室氣體淨排放中的權益份額，包括使用温室氣體碳信用額作為抵銷。淨温室氣體排放量Woodside已根據淨氣體排放量設定了 範圍1和2温室氣體減排目標，既考慮到其運營的直接減排量，也考慮到利用碳信用額作為抵消量實現的減排量 （包括與避免、減少和/或清除活動有關的信用額）。温室氣體淨排放量等於一個實體？s温室氣體總排放量減去報廢碳信用額的數量。4淨零當向大氣層的温室氣體人為排放量與特定碳排放量之間的人為清除量相平衡時， 實現淨零排放量。ed時期。在涉及多種温室氣體的情況下，量化？淨零排放量的陽離子取決於選擇比較不同氣體排放量的氣候指標 （如全球變暖潛勢、全球温度變化潛勢和其他，以及選定的時間範圍）。5新能源伍德賽德使用這個術語來描述能源技術，如氫或氨，這些能源正在出現規模，但由於在使用點的温室氣體排放量低於傳統化石燃料，預計將在能源轉型期間增長。可能包括 用化石燃料製造的新能源產品。NGL天然氣液體補償實體的賠償？通過在該實體的邊界或價值鏈之外實現等量的減排量或清除量，從而減少其範圍內的温室氣體排放量 。承購承購是指買賣雙方就購買和交付產品（通常是商品或能源）達成的協議。OGCI油氣氣候倡議。ogci.com. 運營商，油氣合資企業參與者通常會指定一家公司作為運營商，運營商將擁有代表非運營合資企業參與者管理合資企業活動的合同權力。 如果Woodside是一家合資企業的經營者，且其持有股權，則本報告將該合資企業稱為正在經營中。如果另一家公司是伍德賽德持有股權的合資企業的運營商，本 報告將該合資企業稱為非運營。巴黎與將全球升温限制在工業化前水平以上2攝氏度以下以及努力將升温限制在1. 5攝氏度的設想相一致。2殘留水平殘留排放水平表示儘可能減少排放量的目標，排放量考慮到技術能力和商業可行性，使其達到接近但不達到零的水平。報廢，將碳信用轉賬至登記賬户，永久將碳報廢信用從流通中移除。退役一詞適用於一個實體為履行自願承諾或履約義務而使用碳信用額度。RFSU已準備好 啟動。範圍1温室氣體直接温室氣體排放。這些排放來自排放公司擁有或控制的來源，例如，在擁有或控制的鍋爐、熔爐、車輛等中燃燒產生的排放；在擁有或控制的工藝設備中進行化學生產所產生的排放。伍德賽德估計温室氣體排放量、能值和全球變暖潛力是根據發生排放的司法管轄區的相關報告法規進行估計的(例如，澳大利亞國家温室氣體報告和能源報告(NGER)、美國環保局温室氣體報告計劃(GHGRP))。澳大利亞監管報告原則已被用於尚不存在法規的司法管轄區的排放。3伍德賽德？S氣候過渡行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司78

Scope 2 GHG Electricity indirect GHG emissions. Scope 2 accounts for GHG emissions from the generation emissions of purchased electricity consumed by the company. Purchased electricity is de?ned as electricity that is purchased or otherwise brought into the organisational boundary of the company. Scope 2 emissions physically occur at the facility where electricity is generated. Woodside estimates greenhouse gas emissions, energy values and global warming potentials are estimated in accordance with the relevant reporting regulations in the jurisdiction where the emissions occur (e.g. Australian National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER), US EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP)). Australian regulatory reporting principles have been used for emissions in jurisdictions where regulations do not yet exist.3 Scope 3 GHG Other indirect GHG emissions. Scope 3 is a reporting category that allows for the treatment emissions of all other indirect emissions. Scope 3 emissions are a consequence of the activities of the company, but occur from sources not owned or controlled by the company. Some examples of Scope 3 activities are extraction and production of purchased materials; transportation of purchased fuels; and use of sold products and services. Please refer to the data table on page 73 for further information on the Scope 3 emissions categories reported by Woodside.3 Short-, medium- This report refers to ranges of time as follows: short-term means from now until 2025; and long-term medium-term means 2026-2035; long-term means 2036 and beyond. Woodside also refers to ?near-term? and ?medium-term? in the specific context of its net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. In this context, near-term refers to the 2025 as a point in time, and medium term refers to 2030 as a point in time, being the years to which the targets relate. Starting base For its net equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions targets, Woodside uses a starting base of 6.32 Mt CO -e which is representative of the gross annual average equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse 2 gas emissions over 2016-2020 and which may be adjusted (up or down) for potential equity changes in producing or sanctioned assets with a ?nal investment decision prior to 2021. Net equity emissions include the utilisation of carbon credits as offsets. Stranded assets Stranded assets can be broadly defined as assets which ?suffer from unanticipated or premature write-offs, downward revaluations or conversion to liabilities?. Sustainability References to sustainability (including sustainable and sustainably) are used with reference (including to Woodside?s Sustainability Committee and sustainability related Board policies, as well sustainable and as in the context of Woodside?s aim to ensure its business is sustainable from a long-term sustainably) perspective, considering a range of factors including economic (including being able to sustain our business in the long term by being low cost and profitable), environmental (including considering our environmental impact and striving for a lower carbon portfolio), social (including supporting our license to operate), and regulatory (including ongoing compliance with relevant legal obligations). Use of the terms ?sustainability?, ?sustainable? and ?sustainably? is not intended to imply that Woodside will have no adverse impact on the economy, environment, or society, or that Woodside will achieve any particular economic, environmental, or social outcomes. Target Woodside uses this term to describe an intention to seek the achievement of an outcome, where Woodside considers that it has developed a suitably de?ned plan or pathway to achieve that outcome. TCFD Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. For more information see www.fsb-tcfd.org/about. Transition case Woodside uses this term to refer to the methodology Woodside applies to helps us manage risk by assessing investment opportunities across a range of climate-related factors. UNITS OF MEASURE A$ Australian dollars MJ Megajoule bbl barrel MMBtu Million british thermal units bcm billion cubic metres Mt Million tonnes boe barrels of oil equivalent Mtpa Million tonnes per annum EJ Exajoule MW Megawatt g / kg Grams / Kilogram MWh Megawatt hour GJ Gigajoule Sm3 Standard cubic metre GW Gigawatt Tonnes (t and kt) In this report, ?t? means tonne and ?kt? means kilotonne, being one thousand tonnes. GWh Gigawatt hour tpd Tonnes per day ktpa thousand tonnes per annum US$ US dollars kW Kilowatt 1 UNEP, 1992. ?Convention on Biological Diversity?. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf 2 IFRS Foundation, 2021. ?Climate Related Disclosures Prototype?, Appendix A. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/groups/trwg/trwg-climate-related-disclosures-prototype.pdf The IFRS published a further consultation document subsequent to the 2021 prototype. As it did not contain a updated definition of Paris-Aligned scenarios Woodside has retained use of the previous edition. Definition as per the Australian Clean Energy Regulator https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Infohub/Markets/cert-report/cert-report-2023/cert-2023-glossary. 3 World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2004. ?GHG Protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard? https://www.wbcsd.org/Programs/Climate-and-Energy/Climate/Resources/A-corporate-reporting-and-accounting-standard-revised-edition 4 Australian Clean Energy Regulator, 2023. ?Corporate Emissions Reduction Transparency report 2023? https://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/Infohub/Markets/cert-report/cert-report-2023/cert-2023-glossary 5 IPCC, 2018: Annex I: Glossary [馬修斯，J.B.R.（編輯）].全球變暖1.5C。IPCC關於全球變暖 高於工業化前水平 1.5C的影響和相關全球温室氣體排放路徑的特別報告，在加強全球應對氣候變化威脅、可持續發展和努力消除貧困的背景下 [梅森—德莫特， V.，翟平，H.—O. P？rtner，D. Roberts，J. Skea，P.R. Shukla，A. Pirani，W. Moufouma—Okia角P？an，R. Pidcock，S.康納斯，J.B.R. Matthews，Y. Chen，X.周先生，M.I. Gomis，E. Lonnoy，T.梅考克M. Tigor和T.水？Ed（eds.）].劍橋 大學出版社，英國劍橋和紐約，美國紐約，pp. 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.008 2023年全球氣候變遷行動計劃與進展報告Woodside Energy Group Ltd 79

7.5 Index TASK FORCE ON CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES (TCFD) AND SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (SASB) Index to TCFD recommendations and supported recommended disclosures1 Pages Governance: Disclose the organization?s governance around climate-related risks and opportunities. Describe the board?s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. 11-12 Describe management?s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. 12 Strategy: Disclose the actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization?s businesses, strategy, and financial planning where such information is material. Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified over the short, medium, and long term. 57-63 Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization?s businesses, strategy, and financial planning. 14-41, 43, 49-53, 57-63 Describe the resilience of the organization?s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2C or lower scenario. 49-53 Risk Management: Disclose how the organization identi?es, assesses, and manages climate-related risks. Describe the organization?s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. 57-61 Describe the organization?s processes for managing climate-related risks. 57-58 Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organization?s overall risk management. 11-12, 57-58 Metrics and Targets: Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material Disclose the metrics used by the organization to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process. 12, 14-21, 23, 34, 75-76 Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks. 21, 30, 40, 57-63, 72-73 Describe the targets used by the organization to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. 6-7, 12, 14-19, 23, 34, 75-76 Index to selected relevant SASB metrics2 EM-EP-110a.1 Gross global Scope 1 emissions, percentage methane, percentage covered under emissions-limiting regulations 72-73 EM-EP-110a.2 Amount of gross global Scope 1 emissions from: (1) ?ared hydrocarbons, (2) other combustion, (3) process emissions, (4) other vented emissions, and (5) fugitive emissions 72-73 EM-EP-110a.3 Discussion of long-term and short-term strategy or plan to manage Scope 1 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance against those targets 14-31 1 Financial Stability Board 2017. ?Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Final Report.? Figure 4, pp. 14. 2 Sustainability Accounting Standards Board 2018. ?Oil & Gas ? Exploration and Production. Sustainability Accounting Standard. Version 2018-10.? Table 1, pp. 6. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 80

7.6 Disclaimer, and other important risks, emissions information data 1. This report has been prepared to provide our investors and potential investors with information on our plan to help us achieve our strategic aim to thrive through the energy transition and how we are progressing against that strategic aim. 2. This report has been structured to address the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations framework. It aims to provide a balance of disclosures that meet the recommendations of the TCFD, while avoiding overwhelming readers with information. Woodside considers that it addresses TCFD?s four recommendations and eleven recommended disclosures, having had regard to the Guidance for All Sectors and Supplemental Guidance for Non-Financial Groups. Our approach to the disclosures included in this report differs from our approach to the disclosures we include in our mandatory regulatory reports, including our filings with the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE). This report is intended to provide information from a different perspective and in more detail than that required to be included in other regulatory reports, including our filings with the ASX and the SEC. 3. This report has not been prepared as ?nancial or investment advice or to provide any guidance in relation to our future performance. It should be read in conjunction with our periodic reporting and other announcements made to the ASX, SEC and LSE. 4. This report is not intended to, and does not constitute, form part of, or contain an offer or invitation to sell to Woodside (or any other person) or a solicitation of an offer from Woodside (or any other person) in any jurisdiction. 5. Given the focus of this report, it is necessarily oriented towards future events and contains forward looking information regarding the plans, strategies, objectives, targets, aspirations and the like of Woodside in relation to climate change. 6. This report is designed to provide a level of insight into how we currently intend to direct the management of our assets and to deploy our capital, to help us achieve our strategic aim. The matters disclosed in this report are a ?point in time? disclosure and reflect management?s expectations, judgments, assessments, assumptions, estimates and other information available at the date of this report and/ or the date of our planning processes. We operate in a dynamic and uncertain market and external environment. Plans and strategies can and must adapt in response to dynamic market conditions, joint venture decisions, new opportunities that might arise or other changing circumstances. Investors should not assume that any plan (including any pathway we have articulated to achieve a strategic aim) is locked in and will not evolve and be updated as time passes. Additionally, a number of aspects of our plans involve developments or strategies that are complex and may be delayed, more costly than anticipated or unsuccessful for many reasons, including reasons that are outside of Woodside?s control. 7. Actual performance against Woodside?s targets (including items that are described as a target) and aspirations or goals may be affected by various risks associated with the Woodside business, the uncertainty as to how the global energy transition to a lower carbon economy will evolve, 8. and physical risks associated with climate change, many of which are beyond Woodside?s control. Further detail on certain of these risks can be found in the Risk Management section of this report and the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report 2023. These risks include, but are not limited to: The risk that a transition to a lower carbon economy may impact demand (and pricing) for oil, gas, new energy products and lower carbon services and their substitutes, the policy and legal environment for their production, our reputation and our operating environment. Further, the imposition of further regulation and the availability and cost of emission allowances or carbon offsets could adversely impact costs of operations; The potential for higher than expected costs of transition to new technologies, and poor efficacy of new technologies that could adversely impact the costs of operations and reduce demand for hydrocarbon products, new energy or lower carbon services; and The decarbonisation plans of other countries. Readers, including investors and prospective investors, should review and have regard to these risks and the other risks identi?ed in this report when considering the information contained in this report. Readers should also note that the high degree of uncertainty around the nature, timing and magnitude of climate-related risks, and the uncertainty as to how the energy transition will evolve, makes it difficult to determine and disclose the risks and their potential impacts with precision. WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 81

9.情景分析有其固有的侷限性，包括本報告第44-45頁所列的侷限性，如果有的話，很難預測其中哪一種情景最終會出現。情景分析依賴於可能正確或可能不正確的假設，以及可能最終或可能不正確的假設，情景還可能受到所披露假設的其他因素的影響。作為情景分析的一部分，伍德賽德使用了國際能源署-S 2023年世界能源展望中發佈的氣候情景(本報告第52-53頁描述了與使用國際能源署情景相關的限制和不確定性)。1 10.本報告中包含的前瞻性陳述不是對未來事件或業績的指導、預測、保證或預測。對於本報告中包含的任何前瞻性信息的準確性、完整性或正確性、實現的可能性或合理基礎，不作任何明示或暗示的陳述或保證。告誡讀者不要過度依賴本報告中包含的任何前瞻性陳述，特別是考慮到本報告討論的長期前景以及未來可能出現的政策、市場和技術發展的內在不確定性。11.本報告所載前瞻性信息可能會受到各種變量和基本假設變化的影響，這些變量和基本假設的變化可能導致實際結果與本報告所載陳述中所表達的結果大不相同。除上述風險外，這些風險還包括價格波動、實際需求、貨幣波動、鑽井和生產結果、儲量估計、市場損失、行業競爭、環境風險、過渡風險、實物風險、立法、政策、規模和監管發展、會計標準的變化、不同國家和地區的經濟和金融市場狀況、政治風險、可通過工程或運營變化實現的減排、項目延遲或推進、審批和成本估算。有些事項還需經合資企業參與方批准。如果伍德賽德改變其在本報告中提出的戰略目標，本報告中描述的目標、抱負和機會也可能發生重大變化。有關更多信息，請參閲我們的2023年年度報告中的前瞻性陳述部分。12.伍德賽德不承諾持續向市場提供有關前瞻性信息的最新信息，包括其實現其戰略目標或指標的計劃，或關於其相對於其計劃或指標的業績的最新情況，除非它有法律義務這樣做。不能將過去的業績作為未來業績的 指南。13.在法律規定的任何不能排除的條款的約束下，伍德賽德對您因本報告中信息的任何錯誤、遺漏或失實陳述而招致的任何損失、損害、成本或費用(無論是直接或間接的)不承擔任何責任。14.本報告不包括伍德賽德購買或銷售金融產品的任何明示或默示價格。15.本報告可能包含行業、市場和競爭地位數據， 基於行業出版物和第三方進行的研究，以及伍德賽德？S的內部估計和研究。雖然伍德賽德相信這些出版物和第三方研究都是可靠的，並且是由信譽良好的來源準備的，但伍德賽德沒有獨立核實從這些第三方來源獲得的市場和行業數據，也不能保證這些數據的完整性或準確性。不應過度依賴本報告中包含的任何 行業、市場或競爭地位數據。16.本報告所載的某些其他信息可能以第三方編寫的信息為基礎。伍德賽德不做任何陳述，也不保證這些第三方材料準確、完整或最新。17.本報告中的所有温室氣體排放數據均為估計數據，因為在測量或量化温室氣體排放方面存在固有的不確定性和侷限性，包括本報告第83頁《全球温室氣體排放保證聲明》中所列的不確定性。18.關於伍德賽德？S温室氣體排放量計算的進一步資料載於本報告第73頁提供的與氣候有關的數據支持表。19.與伍德賽德相比，第三方計算或報告温室氣體排放的方式可能有所不同，這意味着第三方數據可能無法與伍德賽德？S的數據進行比較。1與氣候有關的財務披露工作隊(2020年)。？非金融公司情景分析指南？伍德賽德？S氣候轉型行動計劃和2023年進展報告伍德賽德能源集團有限公司82

7.7 GHD assurance statement Level Perth, 10, WA 999 6000 Hay Street Australia www.ghd. com Independent Limited Assurance Statement to the Directors and Management of Woodside Energy Group Limited ? Climate-related data What we found: Our Limited Assurance Conclusion GHD Pty Ltd (GHD or we) has undertaken a limited assurance engagement in respect of the following selected Climate-related data for the calendar year ending 31 December 2023, presented in the Woodside Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report, Section 7.1 and on Woodside?s website for the calendar year 2023: Metrics Hydrocarbon Production ? Total ? equity (kt) and operated (kt) ? Sales (including Traded Hydrocarbon) ? equity (kt) Global Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions ? Scope 1 and 2 emissions ? equity (net) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 and 2 emissions—operated (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 emissions ? equity (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 emissions ? operated (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 2 emissions—equity (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 2 emissions ? operated (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Equity offsets retired in respect of annual emissions (kt ? Percentage of equity Scope 1 and 2 emissions covered CO?-e) under emissions limiting regulations (%) Sources of equity Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions ? Fuel combustion (kt CO?-e) ? Venting (kt CO?-e) ? Flaring (kt CO?-e) ? Other (kt CO?-e) Equity Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions by country ? Australia (kt CO?-e) ? United States of America (kt CO?-e) ? Trinidad and Tobago (kt CO?-e) Methane ? Methane emissions (greenhouse equivalent) ? equity (kt ? Methane emissions (greenhouse equivalent)—operated (kt CO?-e) CO?-e) ? Percentage of equity gross Scope 1 and 2 emissions that ? Methane intensity ? operated (t CH4/kt total production) are methane (%) ? Methane intensity ? operated (Sm3/Sm3 marketed gas) (%) ? Methane intensity ? equity (t CH4/kt total production) ? Methane intensity ? equity (Sm3/Sm3 marketed gas) (%) Flared gas ? Total flaring ? equity (t) and operated (t) ? Flaring intensity ? equity (t/kt) and operated (t/kt) Global Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions estimates ? Total—Scope 3 emissions ? equity (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 3 emissions—downstream transportation and ? Scope 3 emissions—purchased goods and services, related distribution ? equity (kt CO?-e) to Traded Hydrocarbons—equity (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 3 emissions—use of sold product, related to ? Scope 3 emissions—selected other upstream—equity (kt Woodside production ? equity (kt CO?-e) CO?-e) ? Scope 3 emissions—use of sold product, related to Traded Hydrocarbons ? equity (kt CO?-e) Greenhouse gas emissions intensity ? Scope 1 emissions intensity ? equity (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity—equity (net) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 emissions intensity ? operated (gross) (kt CO?-e) ? Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity—operated (gross) (kt ? Scope 1 upstream facility emissions intensity ? equity CO?-e) (gross) (kg CO2-e/boe) ? Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions intensity ? equity (net) (g CO2- ? Scope 1 LNG facility emissions intensity ? equity (gross) e/MJ) (kg CO2-e/boe) believe that the selected matters are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Reporting Criteria detailed below for the reporting period 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2023. Note, this engagement only provides assurance over the 2023 Climate-related data provided by Woodside and is not inclusive of climate metrics associated with revenue and other climate related disclosures. Reporting Criteria The Reporting Criteria used by Woodside for preparing the selected matters are set out in the Basis of Preparation documents provided by Woodside and in the Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report. The Power of Commitment GHD Pty Ltd | ABN 39 008 488 373 Woodside?s Responsibility Woodside is responsible for preparing the 2023 Climate-related data to be published within the Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report and Woodside website including the preparation of the selected matters in accordance with the Reporting Criteria. This responsibility includes selection of appropriate Reporting Criteria and the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation of the 2023 Climate-related data that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. GHG quantification is subject to inherent uncertainty because of incomplete scientific knowledge used to determine emissions factors and the values needed to combine emissions of different gases. The basis of our conclusion: standards-based limited assurance We conducted our limited assurance engagement in accordance with the Australian Standard on Assurance Engagements ASAE 3410 Assurance Engagements on Greenhouse Gas Statements (ASAE 3410). We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our responsibility Our responsibility is to express a limited assurance conclusion on the 2023 Climate-related data in the Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report and Woodside website based on the procedures we have performed and the evidence we have obtained. We conducted the limited assurance engagement in accordance with ASAE 3410. This requires that we plan and perform the engagement to obtain limited assurance about whether the subject matter is free from material misstatement. A limited assurance engagement undertaken in accordance with ASAE 3410 involves assessing the suitability of Woodside?s use of the Reporting Criteria as the basis for the preparation of the selected matters, assessing the risks of material misstatement of the selected matters whether due to fraud or error. A limited assurance is substantially less in scope than a reasonable assurance engagement in relation to both the risk assessment procedures, including an understanding of internal control, and the procedures performed in response to the assessed risks. What we did: Our assurance procedures The procedures we performed were based on our professional judgement and included enquiries, observation of processes performed, inspection of documents, analytical procedures, evaluating the appropriateness of quantification methods and reporting policies, and agreeing or reconciling with underlying records. Our procedures included: ? Process owner enquiries and review of system documentation, obtaining an understanding of Woodside?s reporting processes relevant to the selected matters and of Woodside?s determination of its reporting boundaries and performed testing to confirm appears to have been appropriately implemented. ? Testing Woodside?s calculations of 2023 Climate-related data based on the activity data and applying appropriate conversion and emissions factors in accordance with the Reporting Criteria. ? Checking Woodside?s presentation of the selected matters in its Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report, including that they were prepared in accordance with the findings from our limited assurance engagement. Our Independence and Quality Control We have complied with the relevant ethical requirements relating to assurance engagements, which is founded on fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality, and professional behaviour. GHD applies Auditing Standard ASQM 1 Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Reports and Other Financial Information, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements (ASQM1), and accordingly we maintain a comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards, and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Inherent limitations There are inherent limitations in performing assurance; for example, assurance engagements are based on selective testing of the information being examined and because of this, it is possible that fraud, error, or non-compliance may occur and not be detected. assurance engagement is not designed to detect all misstatements, as an assurance engagement is not performed continuously throughout the period that is the subject of the engagement and the procedures are performed on a test basis. Our engagement did not include assurance of other information within the Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report and the Woodside website other than the selected matters, including no assurance provided in respect of previous years? comparative numbers for the selected matters. Restricted use of our limited assurance statement: Only Woodside may rely upon it This limited assurance statement has been prepared for a specific purpose agreed with Woodside. Whilst we accept that Woodside may publish this limited assurance statement in its Climate Transition Action Plan and 2023 Progress Report and website as evidence of the assurance it has obtained, our limited assurance statement is not suitable to rely on for anyone else for any purpose. Accordingly, we expressly disclaim and do not accept any responsibility or liability to any party other than Woodside for any consequences of reliance on this limited assurance statement for any purpose. Michele Villa Registered Greenhouse and Energy Auditor Category 2 (Audit Team Leader), GHD Pty Ltd 27 February 2024 WOODSIDE?S CLIMATE TRANSITION ACTION PLAN AND 2023 PROGRESS REPORT WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD 83

Head Office Woodside Energy Group Ltd Mia Yellagonga 11 Mount Street Perth WA 6000 Postal Address GPO Box D188 Perth WA 6840 Australia T +61 8 9348 4000 F +61 8 9214 2777 E companyinfo@woodside.com Woodside Energy Group Ltd ABN 55 004 898 962 woodside.com