share_log

SEC proposes new rule requiring short-sellers to disclose their positions monthly

Dow Jones Newswires ·  Feb 25, 2022 17:42

By Thornton McEnery

New rule by Gensler seeks to bring more market data out of dark corners and into the light

Gary Gensler has been circling short-sellers for months, and now the Securities and Exchange Commission chief is looking to make a big move.

Under a new rule proposed by the SEC Friday morning, some investors would be required to report their short sale-related activity to the SEC on a monthly basis, allowing the commission to make detailed short-selling data available to the public for the first time.

"Today, the Commission unanimously voted to propose rules and amendments to broaden the scope of short sale-related data available to the investing public and to regulators," Gensler said in a statement. "If adopted, it would strengthen transparency of an important area of our markets that would benefit from greater visibility and oversight."

Since taking the reins at SEC, Gensler has made market transparency a key goal, and short-selling has been a major area of discussion, including after the wild short squeeze that took hold in January 2021 on meme stocks like $GameStop(GME.US)$ and $AMC Entertainment(AMC.US)$.

The fallout from the short squeeze resulted in a Congressional hearing and an SEC investigation. While the probe did not find any actual malfeasance, Gensler has been hinting that he still was monitoring short-sellers. In February, Bloomberg News reported on a sweeping Department of Justice probe of at least 30 short-selling firms and allies.

Retail investors have complained that more shares are being shorted than are available to trade, while keeping alive online discussions claiming market manipulation, potential fraud by short-sellers and the lack of data publicly available around short-seller trading activity.

Under current rules, firms are required to report short interest data to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority twice a month. Critics have said the quality and frequency of that data isn't highly useful.

The SEC's proposed new rule will look to bridge that gap.

While the changes to previously proposed SEC rules have been common, as written Rule 13f-2, would only apply to institutional investment managers that hold "a short position of at least $10 million or the equivalent of 2.5 percent or more of the total shares outstanding" in an individual security, meaning that the SEC would be able to see and share the biggest short sales of individual stocks and aggregate them, providing investors with granular data on those shorts.

Firms also would have two weeks into every month to disclose, giving essentially a detailed 6-week lookback at big short moves and give a much clearer, if month-old, picture of short interest on stocks.

The rule, as designed, would increase disclosure of what is known as "buy-to-cover," essentially when a trader initiates a buy trade to close their short position on borrowed shares, something that short-selling critics likely will welcome as it would aim to further curb so-called "naked shorting," a practice the SEC mostly outlawed in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis for traders using non-existent shares to short stock of public companies.

Overall, the new transparency rule is yet another push by Gensler to bring more market data out of the dark corners and into the light.

As he told MarketWatch in an exclusive interview last week, "Finance is ultimately about trust, and the official sector has a role to help instill that trust through a set of rules on disclosure, anti-fraud and anti-manipulation."

-Thornton McEnery

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
17
Comment Comment 11 · Views 13.3k

Comment(11)

  • user-avatar

    What do you mean by “some”? It’s FKING ALL HEDGE FUNDS which includes Shittydel that must report. Here comes another problem. Reports can be FAKE.

    Feb 26, 2022 09:23
  • user-avatar

    Actually hilarious how people like time Thornton write this….and yet Gary Gensler himself said a whIle back it was never a short squeeze which triggered amc and Gme. Keep showing the public you know nothing but propaganda Thornton good job

    评论图片
    Feb 28, 2022 11:34
  • user-avatar

    LONG AMC

    Feb 28, 2022 11:36
  • user-avatar

    2/25/2022. Old News

    Feb 28, 2022 14:27
  • user-avatar

    Lol 😂

    Feb 28, 2022 14:32
  • user-avatar

    ---^ this shit says the short squeeze happened already.


    which is fake news xD January's runs were ALL Fomo.(fear of missing out buying) NOT shorts covering.

    no shorts covering=/=short squeeze.

    the squeeze is still going lol

    Feb 28, 2022 16:22
  • user-avatar

    The SEC found no malfeasance by the shortsellers....
    Close the darkpools and look what happens Kenny, I want to see every transaction on the lit!

    Mar 1, 2022 05:34
  • user-avatar

    how about zero share lending how about that and how about making options up to those holding the stock how about making all options covered calls and puts how about that why should anyone get a damn discount for buying a hundred shares! get it out the mud before you start working options plain and simple

    Mar 1, 2022 13:25
  • user-avatar

    Eh, don’t sleep on the 70%+ DP volume either GG

    评论图片
    Mar 2, 2022 00:11
  • user-avatar

    SEC has been letting hedge funds naked short forever, why would they stop corruption now??? When people are arrested snd brought yo trial, i’ll believe the hype. Until then, this is nothing more than fluff to buy more time. Give retail traders false hope that the market is fair and equally balanced under the law when its CLEARLY not.

    Mar 2, 2022 00:59
  • user-avatar

    Hey SEC! HOW ABOUT SUSPEND A HEDGE FUND’s ability to trade stocks for 30-90 days for repeated back to back monthly FTDs (fails to deliver) regardless of clearing them off the books! What incentive do institutions even have to buy back at a loss after a bad bet when they can just fail to deliver??? Never heard of such get out of jail free nonsense in my life.

    Mar 2, 2022 01:03

Recommended

Write a comment
11